The importance of structural model availability on seismic interpretation

Juan Alcalde, Clare E. Bond, Gareth Johnson, Robert W. H. Butler, Mark A. Cooper, Jennifer F. Ellis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Interpretation of faults in seismic images is central to the creation of geological models of the subsurface. The use of prior knowledge acquired through learning allows interpreters to move from singular observations to reasoned interpretations based on the conceptual models available to them. The amount and variety of fault examples available in textbooks, articles and training exercises is therefore likely to be a determinant factor in the interpreters' ability to interpret realistic fault geometries in seismic data. We analysed the differences in fault type and geometry interpreted in seismic data by students before and after completing a masters module in structural geology, and compared them to the characteristics of faults represented in the module and textbooks. We propose that the observed over-representation of normal-planar faults in early teaching materials influences the interpretation of data, making this fault type and geometry dominant in the pre-module interpretations. However, when the students were exposed to a greater range in fault models in the module, the range of fault type and geometry increased. This work explores the role of model availability in interpretation and advocates for the use of realistic fault models in training materials.
LanguageEnglish
Pages161-171
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Structural Geology
Volume97
Early online date4 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Apr 2017

Fingerprint

textbook
geometry
seismic data
student
fault geometry
structural geology
learning
teaching material

Keywords

  • seismic interpretation
  • gault models
  • availability bias
  • prior knowledge
  • structural geology

Cite this

Alcalde, Juan ; Bond, Clare E. ; Johnson, Gareth ; Butler, Robert W. H. ; Cooper, Mark A. ; Ellis, Jennifer F. / The importance of structural model availability on seismic interpretation. In: Journal of Structural Geology. 2017 ; Vol. 97. pp. 161-171.
@article{bf1a5f441ed9438c9cec16ce7ef173c8,
title = "The importance of structural model availability on seismic interpretation",
abstract = "Interpretation of faults in seismic images is central to the creation of geological models of the subsurface. The use of prior knowledge acquired through learning allows interpreters to move from singular observations to reasoned interpretations based on the conceptual models available to them. The amount and variety of fault examples available in textbooks, articles and training exercises is therefore likely to be a determinant factor in the interpreters' ability to interpret realistic fault geometries in seismic data. We analysed the differences in fault type and geometry interpreted in seismic data by students before and after completing a masters module in structural geology, and compared them to the characteristics of faults represented in the module and textbooks. We propose that the observed over-representation of normal-planar faults in early teaching materials influences the interpretation of data, making this fault type and geometry dominant in the pre-module interpretations. However, when the students were exposed to a greater range in fault models in the module, the range of fault type and geometry increased. This work explores the role of model availability in interpretation and advocates for the use of realistic fault models in training materials.",
keywords = "seismic interpretation, gault models, availability bias, prior knowledge, structural geology",
author = "Juan Alcalde and Bond, {Clare E.} and Gareth Johnson and Butler, {Robert W. H.} and Cooper, {Mark A.} and Ellis, {Jennifer F.}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsg.2017.03.003",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
pages = "161--171",
journal = "Journal of Structural Geology",
issn = "0191-8141",

}

The importance of structural model availability on seismic interpretation. / Alcalde, Juan; Bond, Clare E.; Johnson, Gareth; Butler, Robert W. H.; Cooper, Mark A.; Ellis, Jennifer F.

In: Journal of Structural Geology, Vol. 97, 30.04.2017, p. 161-171.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The importance of structural model availability on seismic interpretation

AU - Alcalde, Juan

AU - Bond, Clare E.

AU - Johnson, Gareth

AU - Butler, Robert W. H.

AU - Cooper, Mark A.

AU - Ellis, Jennifer F.

PY - 2017/4/30

Y1 - 2017/4/30

N2 - Interpretation of faults in seismic images is central to the creation of geological models of the subsurface. The use of prior knowledge acquired through learning allows interpreters to move from singular observations to reasoned interpretations based on the conceptual models available to them. The amount and variety of fault examples available in textbooks, articles and training exercises is therefore likely to be a determinant factor in the interpreters' ability to interpret realistic fault geometries in seismic data. We analysed the differences in fault type and geometry interpreted in seismic data by students before and after completing a masters module in structural geology, and compared them to the characteristics of faults represented in the module and textbooks. We propose that the observed over-representation of normal-planar faults in early teaching materials influences the interpretation of data, making this fault type and geometry dominant in the pre-module interpretations. However, when the students were exposed to a greater range in fault models in the module, the range of fault type and geometry increased. This work explores the role of model availability in interpretation and advocates for the use of realistic fault models in training materials.

AB - Interpretation of faults in seismic images is central to the creation of geological models of the subsurface. The use of prior knowledge acquired through learning allows interpreters to move from singular observations to reasoned interpretations based on the conceptual models available to them. The amount and variety of fault examples available in textbooks, articles and training exercises is therefore likely to be a determinant factor in the interpreters' ability to interpret realistic fault geometries in seismic data. We analysed the differences in fault type and geometry interpreted in seismic data by students before and after completing a masters module in structural geology, and compared them to the characteristics of faults represented in the module and textbooks. We propose that the observed over-representation of normal-planar faults in early teaching materials influences the interpretation of data, making this fault type and geometry dominant in the pre-module interpretations. However, when the students were exposed to a greater range in fault models in the module, the range of fault type and geometry increased. This work explores the role of model availability in interpretation and advocates for the use of realistic fault models in training materials.

KW - seismic interpretation

KW - gault models

KW - availability bias

KW - prior knowledge

KW - structural geology

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsg.2017.03.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jsg.2017.03.003

M3 - Article

VL - 97

SP - 161

EP - 171

JO - Journal of Structural Geology

T2 - Journal of Structural Geology

JF - Journal of Structural Geology

SN - 0191-8141

ER -