The importance of epistemic cognition in student-centred learning

Effie Maclellan, R. Soden

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    23 Citations (Scopus)
    18 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    To infer the sophistication of epistemic thinking in a sample of undergraduate students, 25 participants completed a free-response task in which they were asked to give reasons for their agreement or disagreement with a small number of beliefs about the role of tutorials and of tutors in gaining knowledge. Responses were analysed according to King & Kitchener's (1994) stages of reasoning, revealing that the justifications offered were either at the stages of pre-reflective or quasi-reflective thinking with none exhibiting reflective thinking. The findings have two main pedagogical implications: first that good teaching be understood not as a set of performance skills which may only be opportunistically related to students' extant conceptualisations but as the locus through which students confront their own epistemic beliefs. A second implication is that to extend students' reasoning, teaching practices must focus explicitly on the difficult issue of what counts as evidence
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)253-268
    Number of pages15
    JournalInstructional Science
    Volume32
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2 Nov 2004

    Fingerprint

    Cognition
    cognition
    Learning
    Students
    learning
    Teaching
    student
    teaching practice
    tutor
    performance
    evidence
    Thinking

    Cite this

    @article{21af59a3d6c740caac40d279cfdcbd10,
    title = "The importance of epistemic cognition in student-centred learning",
    abstract = "To infer the sophistication of epistemic thinking in a sample of undergraduate students, 25 participants completed a free-response task in which they were asked to give reasons for their agreement or disagreement with a small number of beliefs about the role of tutorials and of tutors in gaining knowledge. Responses were analysed according to King & Kitchener's (1994) stages of reasoning, revealing that the justifications offered were either at the stages of pre-reflective or quasi-reflective thinking with none exhibiting reflective thinking. The findings have two main pedagogical implications: first that good teaching be understood not as a set of performance skills which may only be opportunistically related to students' extant conceptualisations but as the locus through which students confront their own epistemic beliefs. A second implication is that to extend students' reasoning, teaching practices must focus explicitly on the difficult issue of what counts as evidence",
    author = "Effie Maclellan and R. Soden",
    year = "2004",
    month = "11",
    day = "2",
    doi = "10.1023/B:TRUC.0000024213.03972.ce",
    language = "English",
    volume = "32",
    pages = "253--268",
    journal = "Instructional Science",
    issn = "0020-4277",
    number = "3",

    }

    The importance of epistemic cognition in student-centred learning. / Maclellan, Effie; Soden, R.

    In: Instructional Science, Vol. 32, No. 3, 02.11.2004, p. 253-268.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The importance of epistemic cognition in student-centred learning

    AU - Maclellan, Effie

    AU - Soden, R.

    PY - 2004/11/2

    Y1 - 2004/11/2

    N2 - To infer the sophistication of epistemic thinking in a sample of undergraduate students, 25 participants completed a free-response task in which they were asked to give reasons for their agreement or disagreement with a small number of beliefs about the role of tutorials and of tutors in gaining knowledge. Responses were analysed according to King & Kitchener's (1994) stages of reasoning, revealing that the justifications offered were either at the stages of pre-reflective or quasi-reflective thinking with none exhibiting reflective thinking. The findings have two main pedagogical implications: first that good teaching be understood not as a set of performance skills which may only be opportunistically related to students' extant conceptualisations but as the locus through which students confront their own epistemic beliefs. A second implication is that to extend students' reasoning, teaching practices must focus explicitly on the difficult issue of what counts as evidence

    AB - To infer the sophistication of epistemic thinking in a sample of undergraduate students, 25 participants completed a free-response task in which they were asked to give reasons for their agreement or disagreement with a small number of beliefs about the role of tutorials and of tutors in gaining knowledge. Responses were analysed according to King & Kitchener's (1994) stages of reasoning, revealing that the justifications offered were either at the stages of pre-reflective or quasi-reflective thinking with none exhibiting reflective thinking. The findings have two main pedagogical implications: first that good teaching be understood not as a set of performance skills which may only be opportunistically related to students' extant conceptualisations but as the locus through which students confront their own epistemic beliefs. A second implication is that to extend students' reasoning, teaching practices must focus explicitly on the difficult issue of what counts as evidence

    U2 - 10.1023/B:TRUC.0000024213.03972.ce

    DO - 10.1023/B:TRUC.0000024213.03972.ce

    M3 - Article

    VL - 32

    SP - 253

    EP - 268

    JO - Instructional Science

    JF - Instructional Science

    SN - 0020-4277

    IS - 3

    ER -