The impact of Scotland‟s economy on the environment: a note on input-output and ecological footprint analysis

Ian Moffatt, Thomas Wiedmann, John Barrett, Brian Ashcroft (Editor)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Several recent papers examining the impact of the Scottish and Jersey economy on the environment have criticised the Ecological Footprint (EF) method and have suggested the use of input-output (IO) analysis instead (McGregor et al., 2004a; McGregor et al., 2004b; Ferguson et al., 2004; Allan et al., 2004). It is argued that “IO can be used to provide a coherent and practical alternative method to the Ecological Footprint of locating the responsibility and source of resource use and waste/pollution” (Allan et al., 2004) and several aspects of the EF methodology are criticised specifically. In this paper we reply to these critiques and discuss the scope and limitations of both the NCLAS as well as the Ecological Footprint. We argue that EF and IO are complementary methods that can be combined in a meaningful way. We suggest a way forward that helps to improve the scientific understanding of key sustainable development issues.
LanguageEnglish
Pages37-44
Number of pages8
JournalQuarterly Economic Commentary
Volume30
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2005

Fingerprint

Sustainable development
Pollution
Ecological footprint analysis
Scotland
Ecological footprint

Keywords

  • Fraser of Allander Institute
  • Scottish economy
  • ecological footprints
  • environment

Cite this

@article{8febd2b3f29842d88f8f27198817d3d9,
title = "The impact of Scotland‟s economy on the environment: a note on input-output and ecological footprint analysis",
abstract = "Several recent papers examining the impact of the Scottish and Jersey economy on the environment have criticised the Ecological Footprint (EF) method and have suggested the use of input-output (IO) analysis instead (McGregor et al., 2004a; McGregor et al., 2004b; Ferguson et al., 2004; Allan et al., 2004). It is argued that “IO can be used to provide a coherent and practical alternative method to the Ecological Footprint of locating the responsibility and source of resource use and waste/pollution” (Allan et al., 2004) and several aspects of the EF methodology are criticised specifically. In this paper we reply to these critiques and discuss the scope and limitations of both the NCLAS as well as the Ecological Footprint. We argue that EF and IO are complementary methods that can be combined in a meaningful way. We suggest a way forward that helps to improve the scientific understanding of key sustainable development issues.",
keywords = "Fraser of Allander Institute, Scottish economy, ecological footprints, environment",
author = "Ian Moffatt and Thomas Wiedmann and John Barrett and Brian Ashcroft",
year = "2005",
month = "10",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "37--44",
journal = "Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary",
issn = "2046-5378",
publisher = "University of Strathclyde",
number = "3",

}

The impact of Scotland‟s economy on the environment : a note on input-output and ecological footprint analysis. / Moffatt, Ian; Wiedmann, Thomas; Barrett, John; Ashcroft, Brian (Editor).

In: Quarterly Economic Commentary, Vol. 30, No. 3, 10.2005, p. 37-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of Scotland‟s economy on the environment

T2 - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

AU - Moffatt, Ian

AU - Wiedmann, Thomas

AU - Barrett, John

A2 - Ashcroft, Brian

PY - 2005/10

Y1 - 2005/10

N2 - Several recent papers examining the impact of the Scottish and Jersey economy on the environment have criticised the Ecological Footprint (EF) method and have suggested the use of input-output (IO) analysis instead (McGregor et al., 2004a; McGregor et al., 2004b; Ferguson et al., 2004; Allan et al., 2004). It is argued that “IO can be used to provide a coherent and practical alternative method to the Ecological Footprint of locating the responsibility and source of resource use and waste/pollution” (Allan et al., 2004) and several aspects of the EF methodology are criticised specifically. In this paper we reply to these critiques and discuss the scope and limitations of both the NCLAS as well as the Ecological Footprint. We argue that EF and IO are complementary methods that can be combined in a meaningful way. We suggest a way forward that helps to improve the scientific understanding of key sustainable development issues.

AB - Several recent papers examining the impact of the Scottish and Jersey economy on the environment have criticised the Ecological Footprint (EF) method and have suggested the use of input-output (IO) analysis instead (McGregor et al., 2004a; McGregor et al., 2004b; Ferguson et al., 2004; Allan et al., 2004). It is argued that “IO can be used to provide a coherent and practical alternative method to the Ecological Footprint of locating the responsibility and source of resource use and waste/pollution” (Allan et al., 2004) and several aspects of the EF methodology are criticised specifically. In this paper we reply to these critiques and discuss the scope and limitations of both the NCLAS as well as the Ecological Footprint. We argue that EF and IO are complementary methods that can be combined in a meaningful way. We suggest a way forward that helps to improve the scientific understanding of key sustainable development issues.

KW - Fraser of Allander Institute

KW - Scottish economy

KW - ecological footprints

KW - environment

UR - http://www.strath.ac.uk/frasercommentary/

UR - http://www.strath.ac.uk/fraser/

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 37

EP - 44

JO - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

JF - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

SN - 2046-5378

IS - 3

ER -