The impact of research funding on scientific outputs: evidence from six smaller European countries

Abdullah Gök, John Rigby, Philip Shapira

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

75 Citations (Scopus)
419 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We investigate the relationships between the citation impacts of scientific papers and the sources of funding that are acknowledged as having supported those publications. We examine several relationships potentially associated with funding, including first citation, total citations, and the chances of becoming highly cited. Furthermore, we explore the links between citations and types of funding by organization and also with combined measures of funding. In particular, we examine the relationship between funding intensity and funding variety and citation. Our empirical work focuses on six small advanced European economies, applying a zero inflated negative binomial model to a set of more than 240,000 papers authored by researchers from these countries. We find that funding is not related to the first citation but is significantly related to the number of citations and top percentile citation impact. Additionally, we find that citation impact is positively related to funding variety and negatively related with funding intensity. Finally there is an inverse relationship between the relative frequency of funding and citation impact. The results presented in the paper provide insights for the design of research programs and the structure of research funding and for the behavior and strategies of research and sponsoring organizations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)715-730
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Volume67
Issue number3
Early online date5 May 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2016

Keywords

  • bibliometrics
  • funding

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of research funding on scientific outputs: evidence from six smaller European countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this