The humanistic roots of Islamic administration and leadership for education

philosophical foundations for cross-cultural and transcultural teaching

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

For a number of decades, a humanistic approach has been a minor but persistent one in the Western field of administrative and leadership studies, and only recently has been broadening to include other humanist traditions (Dierksmeier et al., 2011) and has yet to be fully explored in educational administration and its pedagogy and curriculum although some foundational work has been done (e.g., Samier, 2005). The focus in this chapter is on the Islamic humanist tradition as it relates to the teaching of educational administration and leadership in a Muslim context, with implications for cross-cultural and transcultural use. The second purpose of the chapter is to show the correspondences that exist between the Islamic and Western humanist traditions in terms of human values, knowledge and educational ideal, which in this chapter are argued to be close to the Western Idealist tradition and the German Bildung conception of education as well as the strong interpretive and hermeneutic foundations that originated in the Islamic tradition and which influenced the foundations of many relevant European schools of thought, particularly in the Enlightenment.The initial section of the chapter is a comparative examination of the central principles of the Islamic humanist tradition from the classical through to contemporary times with the Western humanist tradition as they relate to conceptions of the good, ethics, the construction of meaning and a set of higher order values predicated upon human dignity, integrity, empathy, well-being, and the public good (Goodman, 2003) covering a number of important scholars like Al Farabi, al Isfanhani, and Edward Said (e.g., Kraemer, 1986). In both, professions are viewed as meaningful work that allow for large measures of decision making, and are grounded in human qualities and needs including autonomy, freedom and emancipation balanced with responsibilities, obligations and duties to society. These are compared with the corresponding principles of knowledge in Western humanism which includes a strong constructivist view of reality (Makdisi, 1990). Secondly, the chapter examines the principles of good or ideal leadership and administration that humanism aims at in its preparation of officials, including those in the educational sector in both the classical Islamic tradition (Hassi, 2012) and Western approaches to humanistic administration and leadership (Czarniawska-Joerges & Guillet de Monthoux, 1994; Gagliardi & Czarniawska, 2006; Leoussi, 2000). The third section focusses on close correspondences that exist between the Islamic (Afsaruddin, 2016; al-Attas, 1980; Yasin & Jani, 2013) and Western (Aloni, 2007; Veugelers, 2011) humanist education traditions in terms of educational ideal as well as the kind of teaching practices that distinguish these traditions (Daiber, 2013; Dossett, 2014) as they apply to educational administration and leadership (Greenfield & Ribbins, 1993). The chapter concludes with a discussion of how the Islamic humanist tradition can contribute to cross-cultural and transcultural graduate teaching in international educational administration (Khan & Amann, 2013).
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTeaching Educational Leadership in Muslim Countries
Subtitle of host publicationTheoretical, Historical and Cultural Foundations
EditorsEugenie A. Samier, Eman S. Elkaleh
Place of PublicationSingapore
Pages23-38
Number of pages16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Jun 2019

Publication series

NameEducational Leadership Theory
PublisherSpringer
ISSN (Print)2510-1781

Fingerprint

leadership
Teaching
education
educational ideal
humanism
conception of education
human dignity
emancipation
hermeneutics
empathy
teaching practice
integrity
Values
obligation
Muslim
autonomy
well-being
profession
moral philosophy
graduate

Keywords

  • Islamic educational administration
  • Islamic educational leadership

Cite this

Samier, E. A. (2019). The humanistic roots of Islamic administration and leadership for education: philosophical foundations for cross-cultural and transcultural teaching. In E. A. Samier, & E. S. Elkaleh (Eds.), Teaching Educational Leadership in Muslim Countries: Theoretical, Historical and Cultural Foundations (pp. 23-38). (Educational Leadership Theory). Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6818-9_2
Samier, Eugenie A. / The humanistic roots of Islamic administration and leadership for education : philosophical foundations for cross-cultural and transcultural teaching. Teaching Educational Leadership in Muslim Countries: Theoretical, Historical and Cultural Foundations . editor / Eugenie A. Samier ; Eman S. Elkaleh. Singapore, 2019. pp. 23-38 (Educational Leadership Theory).
@inbook{036bb6cd58de4cc29952cf3187821420,
title = "The humanistic roots of Islamic administration and leadership for education: philosophical foundations for cross-cultural and transcultural teaching",
abstract = "For a number of decades, a humanistic approach has been a minor but persistent one in the Western field of administrative and leadership studies, and only recently has been broadening to include other humanist traditions (Dierksmeier et al., 2011) and has yet to be fully explored in educational administration and its pedagogy and curriculum although some foundational work has been done (e.g., Samier, 2005). The focus in this chapter is on the Islamic humanist tradition as it relates to the teaching of educational administration and leadership in a Muslim context, with implications for cross-cultural and transcultural use. The second purpose of the chapter is to show the correspondences that exist between the Islamic and Western humanist traditions in terms of human values, knowledge and educational ideal, which in this chapter are argued to be close to the Western Idealist tradition and the German Bildung conception of education as well as the strong interpretive and hermeneutic foundations that originated in the Islamic tradition and which influenced the foundations of many relevant European schools of thought, particularly in the Enlightenment.The initial section of the chapter is a comparative examination of the central principles of the Islamic humanist tradition from the classical through to contemporary times with the Western humanist tradition as they relate to conceptions of the good, ethics, the construction of meaning and a set of higher order values predicated upon human dignity, integrity, empathy, well-being, and the public good (Goodman, 2003) covering a number of important scholars like Al Farabi, al Isfanhani, and Edward Said (e.g., Kraemer, 1986). In both, professions are viewed as meaningful work that allow for large measures of decision making, and are grounded in human qualities and needs including autonomy, freedom and emancipation balanced with responsibilities, obligations and duties to society. These are compared with the corresponding principles of knowledge in Western humanism which includes a strong constructivist view of reality (Makdisi, 1990). Secondly, the chapter examines the principles of good or ideal leadership and administration that humanism aims at in its preparation of officials, including those in the educational sector in both the classical Islamic tradition (Hassi, 2012) and Western approaches to humanistic administration and leadership (Czarniawska-Joerges & Guillet de Monthoux, 1994; Gagliardi & Czarniawska, 2006; Leoussi, 2000). The third section focusses on close correspondences that exist between the Islamic (Afsaruddin, 2016; al-Attas, 1980; Yasin & Jani, 2013) and Western (Aloni, 2007; Veugelers, 2011) humanist education traditions in terms of educational ideal as well as the kind of teaching practices that distinguish these traditions (Daiber, 2013; Dossett, 2014) as they apply to educational administration and leadership (Greenfield & Ribbins, 1993). The chapter concludes with a discussion of how the Islamic humanist tradition can contribute to cross-cultural and transcultural graduate teaching in international educational administration (Khan & Amann, 2013).",
keywords = "Islamic educational administration, Islamic educational leadership",
author = "Samier, {Eugenie A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1007/978-981-13-6818-9_2",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789811368172",
series = "Educational Leadership Theory",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "23--38",
editor = "Samier, {Eugenie A.} and Elkaleh, {Eman S.}",
booktitle = "Teaching Educational Leadership in Muslim Countries",

}

Samier, EA 2019, The humanistic roots of Islamic administration and leadership for education: philosophical foundations for cross-cultural and transcultural teaching. in EA Samier & ES Elkaleh (eds), Teaching Educational Leadership in Muslim Countries: Theoretical, Historical and Cultural Foundations . Educational Leadership Theory, Singapore, pp. 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6818-9_2

The humanistic roots of Islamic administration and leadership for education : philosophical foundations for cross-cultural and transcultural teaching. / Samier, Eugenie A.

Teaching Educational Leadership in Muslim Countries: Theoretical, Historical and Cultural Foundations . ed. / Eugenie A. Samier; Eman S. Elkaleh. Singapore, 2019. p. 23-38 (Educational Leadership Theory).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - The humanistic roots of Islamic administration and leadership for education

T2 - philosophical foundations for cross-cultural and transcultural teaching

AU - Samier, Eugenie A.

PY - 2019/6/10

Y1 - 2019/6/10

N2 - For a number of decades, a humanistic approach has been a minor but persistent one in the Western field of administrative and leadership studies, and only recently has been broadening to include other humanist traditions (Dierksmeier et al., 2011) and has yet to be fully explored in educational administration and its pedagogy and curriculum although some foundational work has been done (e.g., Samier, 2005). The focus in this chapter is on the Islamic humanist tradition as it relates to the teaching of educational administration and leadership in a Muslim context, with implications for cross-cultural and transcultural use. The second purpose of the chapter is to show the correspondences that exist between the Islamic and Western humanist traditions in terms of human values, knowledge and educational ideal, which in this chapter are argued to be close to the Western Idealist tradition and the German Bildung conception of education as well as the strong interpretive and hermeneutic foundations that originated in the Islamic tradition and which influenced the foundations of many relevant European schools of thought, particularly in the Enlightenment.The initial section of the chapter is a comparative examination of the central principles of the Islamic humanist tradition from the classical through to contemporary times with the Western humanist tradition as they relate to conceptions of the good, ethics, the construction of meaning and a set of higher order values predicated upon human dignity, integrity, empathy, well-being, and the public good (Goodman, 2003) covering a number of important scholars like Al Farabi, al Isfanhani, and Edward Said (e.g., Kraemer, 1986). In both, professions are viewed as meaningful work that allow for large measures of decision making, and are grounded in human qualities and needs including autonomy, freedom and emancipation balanced with responsibilities, obligations and duties to society. These are compared with the corresponding principles of knowledge in Western humanism which includes a strong constructivist view of reality (Makdisi, 1990). Secondly, the chapter examines the principles of good or ideal leadership and administration that humanism aims at in its preparation of officials, including those in the educational sector in both the classical Islamic tradition (Hassi, 2012) and Western approaches to humanistic administration and leadership (Czarniawska-Joerges & Guillet de Monthoux, 1994; Gagliardi & Czarniawska, 2006; Leoussi, 2000). The third section focusses on close correspondences that exist between the Islamic (Afsaruddin, 2016; al-Attas, 1980; Yasin & Jani, 2013) and Western (Aloni, 2007; Veugelers, 2011) humanist education traditions in terms of educational ideal as well as the kind of teaching practices that distinguish these traditions (Daiber, 2013; Dossett, 2014) as they apply to educational administration and leadership (Greenfield & Ribbins, 1993). The chapter concludes with a discussion of how the Islamic humanist tradition can contribute to cross-cultural and transcultural graduate teaching in international educational administration (Khan & Amann, 2013).

AB - For a number of decades, a humanistic approach has been a minor but persistent one in the Western field of administrative and leadership studies, and only recently has been broadening to include other humanist traditions (Dierksmeier et al., 2011) and has yet to be fully explored in educational administration and its pedagogy and curriculum although some foundational work has been done (e.g., Samier, 2005). The focus in this chapter is on the Islamic humanist tradition as it relates to the teaching of educational administration and leadership in a Muslim context, with implications for cross-cultural and transcultural use. The second purpose of the chapter is to show the correspondences that exist between the Islamic and Western humanist traditions in terms of human values, knowledge and educational ideal, which in this chapter are argued to be close to the Western Idealist tradition and the German Bildung conception of education as well as the strong interpretive and hermeneutic foundations that originated in the Islamic tradition and which influenced the foundations of many relevant European schools of thought, particularly in the Enlightenment.The initial section of the chapter is a comparative examination of the central principles of the Islamic humanist tradition from the classical through to contemporary times with the Western humanist tradition as they relate to conceptions of the good, ethics, the construction of meaning and a set of higher order values predicated upon human dignity, integrity, empathy, well-being, and the public good (Goodman, 2003) covering a number of important scholars like Al Farabi, al Isfanhani, and Edward Said (e.g., Kraemer, 1986). In both, professions are viewed as meaningful work that allow for large measures of decision making, and are grounded in human qualities and needs including autonomy, freedom and emancipation balanced with responsibilities, obligations and duties to society. These are compared with the corresponding principles of knowledge in Western humanism which includes a strong constructivist view of reality (Makdisi, 1990). Secondly, the chapter examines the principles of good or ideal leadership and administration that humanism aims at in its preparation of officials, including those in the educational sector in both the classical Islamic tradition (Hassi, 2012) and Western approaches to humanistic administration and leadership (Czarniawska-Joerges & Guillet de Monthoux, 1994; Gagliardi & Czarniawska, 2006; Leoussi, 2000). The third section focusses on close correspondences that exist between the Islamic (Afsaruddin, 2016; al-Attas, 1980; Yasin & Jani, 2013) and Western (Aloni, 2007; Veugelers, 2011) humanist education traditions in terms of educational ideal as well as the kind of teaching practices that distinguish these traditions (Daiber, 2013; Dossett, 2014) as they apply to educational administration and leadership (Greenfield & Ribbins, 1993). The chapter concludes with a discussion of how the Islamic humanist tradition can contribute to cross-cultural and transcultural graduate teaching in international educational administration (Khan & Amann, 2013).

KW - Islamic educational administration

KW - Islamic educational leadership

UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6818-9

U2 - 10.1007/978-981-13-6818-9_2

DO - 10.1007/978-981-13-6818-9_2

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9789811368172

T3 - Educational Leadership Theory

SP - 23

EP - 38

BT - Teaching Educational Leadership in Muslim Countries

A2 - Samier, Eugenie A.

A2 - Elkaleh, Eman S.

CY - Singapore

ER -

Samier EA. The humanistic roots of Islamic administration and leadership for education: philosophical foundations for cross-cultural and transcultural teaching. In Samier EA, Elkaleh ES, editors, Teaching Educational Leadership in Muslim Countries: Theoretical, Historical and Cultural Foundations . Singapore. 2019. p. 23-38. (Educational Leadership Theory). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6818-9_2