The Guarani aquifer agreement and transboundary aquifer law in the SADC: comparing apples and oranges?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

nternational law governing transboundary aquifers is considerably underdeveloped, with only a handful of bilateral and multilateral agreements governing specific aquifer systems to date. However, the significance of transboundary aquifers in addressing water security concerns is gaining recognition, and dialogue discussing the future of the international legal framework is growing in importance. Contributing to this dialogue, we seek to compare different legal instruments applicable to the management of transboundary aquifers in different regions. We draw from the experience of the processes that led to an established transboundary agreement in one region, and compare it to another region that is yet to establish a formal legal instrument. Specifically, we compare the Guarani Aquifer System in Latin America with international legal instruments applicable to the management of transboundary aquifers in the Southern African Development Community (SADC). We identify several trends arising from the management of the Guarani Aquifer System that could have potentially valuable input for SADC countries currently embarking upon the initial stages of the management of a transboundary aquifer. Central to this article is the underlying question of whether these international legal instruments, which are placed in dramatically different contexts, can be compared in the first place. We conclude that such a comparison is useful only if undertaken as a process of knowledge acquisition, as such a broad comparative exercise is limited in its ability to produce direct policy recommendations. Gaining knowledge of regional governance practices in relation to differing aquifer characteristics is particularly important in this underdeveloped area, especially as discussions regarding the future for transboundary aquifer law are gaining momentum at the international level.
LanguageEnglish
Pages318-329
Number of pages12
JournalReview of European Community and International Environmental Law
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Nov 2015

Fingerprint

Southern African Development Community
aquifer
Law
management
community
dialogue
knowledge acquisition
Latin America
governance
water
bilateral agreement
ability
trend
experience
momentum
legislation

Keywords

  • international water law
  • transboundary aquifers
  • SADC
  • Guarani
  • comparative law

Cite this

@article{117189d869ec469096b934d7d70b67e9,
title = "The Guarani aquifer agreement and transboundary aquifer law in the SADC: comparing apples and oranges?",
abstract = "nternational law governing transboundary aquifers is considerably underdeveloped, with only a handful of bilateral and multilateral agreements governing specific aquifer systems to date. However, the significance of transboundary aquifers in addressing water security concerns is gaining recognition, and dialogue discussing the future of the international legal framework is growing in importance. Contributing to this dialogue, we seek to compare different legal instruments applicable to the management of transboundary aquifers in different regions. We draw from the experience of the processes that led to an established transboundary agreement in one region, and compare it to another region that is yet to establish a formal legal instrument. Specifically, we compare the Guarani Aquifer System in Latin America with international legal instruments applicable to the management of transboundary aquifers in the Southern African Development Community (SADC). We identify several trends arising from the management of the Guarani Aquifer System that could have potentially valuable input for SADC countries currently embarking upon the initial stages of the management of a transboundary aquifer. Central to this article is the underlying question of whether these international legal instruments, which are placed in dramatically different contexts, can be compared in the first place. We conclude that such a comparison is useful only if undertaken as a process of knowledge acquisition, as such a broad comparative exercise is limited in its ability to produce direct policy recommendations. Gaining knowledge of regional governance practices in relation to differing aquifer characteristics is particularly important in this underdeveloped area, especially as discussions regarding the future for transboundary aquifer law are gaining momentum at the international level.",
keywords = "international water law, transboundary aquifers, SADC, Guarani, comparative law",
author = "Francesco Sindico and Stephanie Hawkins",
note = "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Sindico, F. and Hawkins, S. (2015), The Guarani Aquifer Agreement and Transboundary Aquifer Law in the SADC: Comparing Apples and Oranges?. Rev Euro Comp & Int Env Law, 24: 318–329., which has been published in final form at http://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12139. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1111/reel.12139",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "318--329",
journal = "Review of European Community and International Environmental Law",
issn = "0962-8797",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Guarani aquifer agreement and transboundary aquifer law in the SADC

T2 - Review of European Community and International Environmental Law

AU - Sindico, Francesco

AU - Hawkins, Stephanie

N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Sindico, F. and Hawkins, S. (2015), The Guarani Aquifer Agreement and Transboundary Aquifer Law in the SADC: Comparing Apples and Oranges?. Rev Euro Comp & Int Env Law, 24: 318–329., which has been published in final form at http://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12139. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.

PY - 2015/11/16

Y1 - 2015/11/16

N2 - nternational law governing transboundary aquifers is considerably underdeveloped, with only a handful of bilateral and multilateral agreements governing specific aquifer systems to date. However, the significance of transboundary aquifers in addressing water security concerns is gaining recognition, and dialogue discussing the future of the international legal framework is growing in importance. Contributing to this dialogue, we seek to compare different legal instruments applicable to the management of transboundary aquifers in different regions. We draw from the experience of the processes that led to an established transboundary agreement in one region, and compare it to another region that is yet to establish a formal legal instrument. Specifically, we compare the Guarani Aquifer System in Latin America with international legal instruments applicable to the management of transboundary aquifers in the Southern African Development Community (SADC). We identify several trends arising from the management of the Guarani Aquifer System that could have potentially valuable input for SADC countries currently embarking upon the initial stages of the management of a transboundary aquifer. Central to this article is the underlying question of whether these international legal instruments, which are placed in dramatically different contexts, can be compared in the first place. We conclude that such a comparison is useful only if undertaken as a process of knowledge acquisition, as such a broad comparative exercise is limited in its ability to produce direct policy recommendations. Gaining knowledge of regional governance practices in relation to differing aquifer characteristics is particularly important in this underdeveloped area, especially as discussions regarding the future for transboundary aquifer law are gaining momentum at the international level.

AB - nternational law governing transboundary aquifers is considerably underdeveloped, with only a handful of bilateral and multilateral agreements governing specific aquifer systems to date. However, the significance of transboundary aquifers in addressing water security concerns is gaining recognition, and dialogue discussing the future of the international legal framework is growing in importance. Contributing to this dialogue, we seek to compare different legal instruments applicable to the management of transboundary aquifers in different regions. We draw from the experience of the processes that led to an established transboundary agreement in one region, and compare it to another region that is yet to establish a formal legal instrument. Specifically, we compare the Guarani Aquifer System in Latin America with international legal instruments applicable to the management of transboundary aquifers in the Southern African Development Community (SADC). We identify several trends arising from the management of the Guarani Aquifer System that could have potentially valuable input for SADC countries currently embarking upon the initial stages of the management of a transboundary aquifer. Central to this article is the underlying question of whether these international legal instruments, which are placed in dramatically different contexts, can be compared in the first place. We conclude that such a comparison is useful only if undertaken as a process of knowledge acquisition, as such a broad comparative exercise is limited in its ability to produce direct policy recommendations. Gaining knowledge of regional governance practices in relation to differing aquifer characteristics is particularly important in this underdeveloped area, especially as discussions regarding the future for transboundary aquifer law are gaining momentum at the international level.

KW - international water law

KW - transboundary aquifers

KW - SADC

KW - Guarani

KW - comparative law

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/reel.12139/abstract

U2 - 10.1111/reel.12139

DO - 10.1111/reel.12139

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 318

EP - 329

JO - Review of European Community and International Environmental Law

JF - Review of European Community and International Environmental Law

SN - 0962-8797

IS - 3

ER -