The Google Book settlement and academic libraries

Nicholas Joint

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to illustrate issues surrounding the Google Book settlement in 2009, and its relevance to libraries by general discussion and examples from library practice.

    Design/methodology/approach – A set of projections and speculations that are both conceptual and practical in nature, based on early reactions and comments about this development.

    Findings – There are many philosophical and moral objections to the consequences of the Google Book settlement, and that the practical effects for academic libraries could be both positive and/or negative. The practical examples of such outcomes are designed to help clarify the implications for library and information practitioners and generate further debate.

    Research limitations/implications – The fact that the Book settlement is a legal arrangement between parties in a civil court makes in depth research analysis of a public nature very difficult – which is in itself one of the main themes of the paper.

    Practical implications – The teasing out of the real-life consequences of the settlement are intended be helpful to the library practitioner.

    Originality/value – This paper tries to offer an early insight into an important new development in information retrieval history from the point of view of academic librarians, in contrast to much contemporary comment, which has come from authors and rights holders.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages333-340
    Number of pages8
    JournalLibrary Review
    Volume58
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Fingerprint

    search engine
    civil court
    speculation
    information retrieval
    projection
    librarian
    methodology
    history
    Values

    Keywords

    • digital libraries
    • internet
    • university libraries
    • worldwide web

    Cite this

    Joint, Nicholas. / The Google Book settlement and academic libraries. In: Library Review. 2009 ; Vol. 58, No. 5. pp. 333-340.
    @article{feaf63338eb745f2a57b9cf696f9a545,
    title = "The Google Book settlement and academic libraries",
    abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to illustrate issues surrounding the Google Book settlement in 2009, and its relevance to libraries by general discussion and examples from library practice. Design/methodology/approach – A set of projections and speculations that are both conceptual and practical in nature, based on early reactions and comments about this development. Findings – There are many philosophical and moral objections to the consequences of the Google Book settlement, and that the practical effects for academic libraries could be both positive and/or negative. The practical examples of such outcomes are designed to help clarify the implications for library and information practitioners and generate further debate. Research limitations/implications – The fact that the Book settlement is a legal arrangement between parties in a civil court makes in depth research analysis of a public nature very difficult – which is in itself one of the main themes of the paper. Practical implications – The teasing out of the real-life consequences of the settlement are intended be helpful to the library practitioner. Originality/value – This paper tries to offer an early insight into an important new development in information retrieval history from the point of view of academic librarians, in contrast to much contemporary comment, which has come from authors and rights holders.",
    keywords = "digital libraries, internet, university libraries, worldwide web",
    author = "Nicholas Joint",
    year = "2009",
    doi = "10.1108/00242530910961756",
    language = "English",
    volume = "58",
    pages = "333--340",
    journal = "Library Review",
    issn = "0024-2535",
    publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
    number = "5",

    }

    The Google Book settlement and academic libraries. / Joint, Nicholas.

    In: Library Review, Vol. 58, No. 5, 2009, p. 333-340.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The Google Book settlement and academic libraries

    AU - Joint, Nicholas

    PY - 2009

    Y1 - 2009

    N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to illustrate issues surrounding the Google Book settlement in 2009, and its relevance to libraries by general discussion and examples from library practice. Design/methodology/approach – A set of projections and speculations that are both conceptual and practical in nature, based on early reactions and comments about this development. Findings – There are many philosophical and moral objections to the consequences of the Google Book settlement, and that the practical effects for academic libraries could be both positive and/or negative. The practical examples of such outcomes are designed to help clarify the implications for library and information practitioners and generate further debate. Research limitations/implications – The fact that the Book settlement is a legal arrangement between parties in a civil court makes in depth research analysis of a public nature very difficult – which is in itself one of the main themes of the paper. Practical implications – The teasing out of the real-life consequences of the settlement are intended be helpful to the library practitioner. Originality/value – This paper tries to offer an early insight into an important new development in information retrieval history from the point of view of academic librarians, in contrast to much contemporary comment, which has come from authors and rights holders.

    AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to illustrate issues surrounding the Google Book settlement in 2009, and its relevance to libraries by general discussion and examples from library practice. Design/methodology/approach – A set of projections and speculations that are both conceptual and practical in nature, based on early reactions and comments about this development. Findings – There are many philosophical and moral objections to the consequences of the Google Book settlement, and that the practical effects for academic libraries could be both positive and/or negative. The practical examples of such outcomes are designed to help clarify the implications for library and information practitioners and generate further debate. Research limitations/implications – The fact that the Book settlement is a legal arrangement between parties in a civil court makes in depth research analysis of a public nature very difficult – which is in itself one of the main themes of the paper. Practical implications – The teasing out of the real-life consequences of the settlement are intended be helpful to the library practitioner. Originality/value – This paper tries to offer an early insight into an important new development in information retrieval history from the point of view of academic librarians, in contrast to much contemporary comment, which has come from authors and rights holders.

    KW - digital libraries

    KW - internet

    KW - university libraries

    KW - worldwide web

    U2 - 10.1108/00242530910961756

    DO - 10.1108/00242530910961756

    M3 - Article

    VL - 58

    SP - 333

    EP - 340

    JO - Library Review

    T2 - Library Review

    JF - Library Review

    SN - 0024-2535

    IS - 5

    ER -