The future of the United Kingdom's territorial constitution: can the union survive?

Aileen McHarg

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The 2014 Scottish independence referendum has failed to settle the question of Scotland’s constitutional future, notwithstanding that a clear majority voted to remain part of the United Kingdom (UK). Since the referendum, the UK Parliament has legislated to fulfil the promise made to the people of Scotland that substantial additional powers would be devolved to the Scottish Parliament and its status as a permanent part of the UK constitution guaranteed. Nevertheless, a growing body of opinion argues that more comprehensive reform to the UK’s territorial constitution is required to ensure the long-term survival of the Union. This chapter outlines the nature of the UK’s current territorial constitution, arguing that, while it is formally unitary, constitutional practice suggests that it is better viewed as a union state. However, as currently constituted, the territorial constitution fails to either to adequately recognise the territorial diversity of the UK or to provide sufficient territorial cohesion to maintain the legitimacy of the UK state. An adequate programme of territorial reform therefore needs to go beyond further devolution of powers to Scotland to address problems of lack of security for the autonomy of the UK’s constituent parts, lack of attention to institutions of shared rules, and lack of constitutional reciprocity. Nevertheless, the chapter also identifies major obstacles to the achievement of comprehensive reform of the territorial constitution. It concludes that the territorial constitution is more likely to continue to develop through continued piecemeal and evolutionary change, and that, in the current climate of territorially-polarised politics, this represents an ongoing threat to the survival of the Union.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationClaims for Secession and Federalism
Subtitle of host publicationA Comparative Study with a Special Focus on Spain
EditorsAlberto Lopez Basaguren, Leire Escajedo San Epifanio
Place of PublicationSwtizerland
Pages139-161
Number of pages23
ISBN (Electronic)9783319597072
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

constitution
referendum
reform
parliament
lack
reciprocity
group cohesion
decentralization
legitimacy
autonomy
climate
threat
politics

Keywords

  • Scotland
  • devolution
  • federalism
  • independence

Cite this

McHarg, A. (2019). The future of the United Kingdom's territorial constitution: can the union survive? In A. Lopez Basaguren, & L. Escajedo San Epifanio (Eds.), Claims for Secession and Federalism: A Comparative Study with a Special Focus on Spain (pp. 139-161). Swtizerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59707-2_8
McHarg, Aileen. / The future of the United Kingdom's territorial constitution : can the union survive?. Claims for Secession and Federalism: A Comparative Study with a Special Focus on Spain. editor / Alberto Lopez Basaguren ; Leire Escajedo San Epifanio. Swtizerland, 2019. pp. 139-161
@inbook{519ac880818f4cbc9bbda4a70b0a948f,
title = "The future of the United Kingdom's territorial constitution: can the union survive?",
abstract = "The 2014 Scottish independence referendum has failed to settle the question of Scotland’s constitutional future, notwithstanding that a clear majority voted to remain part of the United Kingdom (UK). Since the referendum, the UK Parliament has legislated to fulfil the promise made to the people of Scotland that substantial additional powers would be devolved to the Scottish Parliament and its status as a permanent part of the UK constitution guaranteed. Nevertheless, a growing body of opinion argues that more comprehensive reform to the UK’s territorial constitution is required to ensure the long-term survival of the Union. This chapter outlines the nature of the UK’s current territorial constitution, arguing that, while it is formally unitary, constitutional practice suggests that it is better viewed as a union state. However, as currently constituted, the territorial constitution fails to either to adequately recognise the territorial diversity of the UK or to provide sufficient territorial cohesion to maintain the legitimacy of the UK state. An adequate programme of territorial reform therefore needs to go beyond further devolution of powers to Scotland to address problems of lack of security for the autonomy of the UK’s constituent parts, lack of attention to institutions of shared rules, and lack of constitutional reciprocity. Nevertheless, the chapter also identifies major obstacles to the achievement of comprehensive reform of the territorial constitution. It concludes that the territorial constitution is more likely to continue to develop through continued piecemeal and evolutionary change, and that, in the current climate of territorially-polarised politics, this represents an ongoing threat to the survival of the Union.",
keywords = "Scotland, devolution, federalism, independence",
author = "Aileen McHarg",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-59707-2_8",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319597065",
pages = "139--161",
editor = "{Lopez Basaguren}, Alberto and {Escajedo San Epifanio}, Leire",
booktitle = "Claims for Secession and Federalism",

}

McHarg, A 2019, The future of the United Kingdom's territorial constitution: can the union survive? in A Lopez Basaguren & L Escajedo San Epifanio (eds), Claims for Secession and Federalism: A Comparative Study with a Special Focus on Spain. Swtizerland, pp. 139-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59707-2_8

The future of the United Kingdom's territorial constitution : can the union survive? / McHarg, Aileen.

Claims for Secession and Federalism: A Comparative Study with a Special Focus on Spain. ed. / Alberto Lopez Basaguren; Leire Escajedo San Epifanio. Swtizerland, 2019. p. 139-161.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - The future of the United Kingdom's territorial constitution

T2 - can the union survive?

AU - McHarg, Aileen

PY - 2019/1/22

Y1 - 2019/1/22

N2 - The 2014 Scottish independence referendum has failed to settle the question of Scotland’s constitutional future, notwithstanding that a clear majority voted to remain part of the United Kingdom (UK). Since the referendum, the UK Parliament has legislated to fulfil the promise made to the people of Scotland that substantial additional powers would be devolved to the Scottish Parliament and its status as a permanent part of the UK constitution guaranteed. Nevertheless, a growing body of opinion argues that more comprehensive reform to the UK’s territorial constitution is required to ensure the long-term survival of the Union. This chapter outlines the nature of the UK’s current territorial constitution, arguing that, while it is formally unitary, constitutional practice suggests that it is better viewed as a union state. However, as currently constituted, the territorial constitution fails to either to adequately recognise the territorial diversity of the UK or to provide sufficient territorial cohesion to maintain the legitimacy of the UK state. An adequate programme of territorial reform therefore needs to go beyond further devolution of powers to Scotland to address problems of lack of security for the autonomy of the UK’s constituent parts, lack of attention to institutions of shared rules, and lack of constitutional reciprocity. Nevertheless, the chapter also identifies major obstacles to the achievement of comprehensive reform of the territorial constitution. It concludes that the territorial constitution is more likely to continue to develop through continued piecemeal and evolutionary change, and that, in the current climate of territorially-polarised politics, this represents an ongoing threat to the survival of the Union.

AB - The 2014 Scottish independence referendum has failed to settle the question of Scotland’s constitutional future, notwithstanding that a clear majority voted to remain part of the United Kingdom (UK). Since the referendum, the UK Parliament has legislated to fulfil the promise made to the people of Scotland that substantial additional powers would be devolved to the Scottish Parliament and its status as a permanent part of the UK constitution guaranteed. Nevertheless, a growing body of opinion argues that more comprehensive reform to the UK’s territorial constitution is required to ensure the long-term survival of the Union. This chapter outlines the nature of the UK’s current territorial constitution, arguing that, while it is formally unitary, constitutional practice suggests that it is better viewed as a union state. However, as currently constituted, the territorial constitution fails to either to adequately recognise the territorial diversity of the UK or to provide sufficient territorial cohesion to maintain the legitimacy of the UK state. An adequate programme of territorial reform therefore needs to go beyond further devolution of powers to Scotland to address problems of lack of security for the autonomy of the UK’s constituent parts, lack of attention to institutions of shared rules, and lack of constitutional reciprocity. Nevertheless, the chapter also identifies major obstacles to the achievement of comprehensive reform of the territorial constitution. It concludes that the territorial constitution is more likely to continue to develop through continued piecemeal and evolutionary change, and that, in the current climate of territorially-polarised politics, this represents an ongoing threat to the survival of the Union.

KW - Scotland

KW - devolution

KW - federalism

KW - independence

UR - http://www.springer.com/gb/

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-59707-2_8

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-59707-2_8

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783319597065

SP - 139

EP - 161

BT - Claims for Secession and Federalism

A2 - Lopez Basaguren, Alberto

A2 - Escajedo San Epifanio, Leire

CY - Swtizerland

ER -

McHarg A. The future of the United Kingdom's territorial constitution: can the union survive? In Lopez Basaguren A, Escajedo San Epifanio L, editors, Claims for Secession and Federalism: A Comparative Study with a Special Focus on Spain. Swtizerland. 2019. p. 139-161 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59707-2_8