The fulfillment of parties' election pledges: a comparative study on the impact of power sharing

Robert Thomson, Terry Royed, Elin Naurin, Joaquín Artés, Rory Costello, Laurenz Ennser-Jedenastik, Mark Ferguson, Petia Kostadinova, Catherine Moury, François Pétry, Katrin Praprotnik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Why are some parties more likely than others to keep the promises they made during previous election campaigns? This study provides the first comparative analysis that addresses this question with common definitions of pledges and fulfillment. We study the fulfillment of 18,743 pledges made in 54 election campaigns in 12 countries. We find high levels of pledge fulfillment for most parties that enter the government executive, and substantially lower levels for parties that do not. The findings challenge the common view of parties as promise breakers. The degree to which governing parties share power affects pledge fulfillment, with parties in single-party executives, both with and without legislative majorities, having the highest fulfillment rates. Within coalition governments, the likelihood of pledge fulfillment depends on whether the party receives the chief executive post and whether another governing party made a similar pledge, but not on the ideological range of the coalition.
LanguageEnglish
JournalAmerican Journal of Political Science
Early online date6 Jun 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 6 Jun 2017

Fingerprint

election campaign
election
coalition

Keywords

  • power sharing
  • election pledges
  • election campaigns

Cite this

Thomson, R., Royed, T., Naurin, E., Artés, J., Costello, R., Ennser-Jedenastik, L., ... Praprotnik, K. (2017). The fulfillment of parties' election pledges: a comparative study on the impact of power sharing. American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12313
Thomson, Robert ; Royed, Terry ; Naurin, Elin ; Artés, Joaquín ; Costello, Rory ; Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz ; Ferguson, Mark ; Kostadinova, Petia ; Moury, Catherine ; Pétry, François ; Praprotnik, Katrin. / The fulfillment of parties' election pledges : a comparative study on the impact of power sharing. In: American Journal of Political Science. 2017.
@article{686bfaae243d4611a15153f4a955484d,
title = "The fulfillment of parties' election pledges: a comparative study on the impact of power sharing",
abstract = "Why are some parties more likely than others to keep the promises they made during previous election campaigns? This study provides the first comparative analysis that addresses this question with common definitions of pledges and fulfillment. We study the fulfillment of 18,743 pledges made in 54 election campaigns in 12 countries. We find high levels of pledge fulfillment for most parties that enter the government executive, and substantially lower levels for parties that do not. The findings challenge the common view of parties as promise breakers. The degree to which governing parties share power affects pledge fulfillment, with parties in single-party executives, both with and without legislative majorities, having the highest fulfillment rates. Within coalition governments, the likelihood of pledge fulfillment depends on whether the party receives the chief executive post and whether another governing party made a similar pledge, but not on the ideological range of the coalition.",
keywords = "power sharing, election pledges, election campaigns",
author = "Robert Thomson and Terry Royed and Elin Naurin and Joaqu{\'i}n Art{\'e}s and Rory Costello and Laurenz Ennser-Jedenastik and Mark Ferguson and Petia Kostadinova and Catherine Moury and Fran{\cc}ois P{\'e}try and Katrin Praprotnik",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1111/ajps.12313",
language = "English",
journal = "American Journal of Political Science",
issn = "0092-5853",

}

Thomson, R, Royed, T, Naurin, E, Artés, J, Costello, R, Ennser-Jedenastik, L, Ferguson, M, Kostadinova, P, Moury, C, Pétry, F & Praprotnik, K 2017, 'The fulfillment of parties' election pledges: a comparative study on the impact of power sharing' American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12313

The fulfillment of parties' election pledges : a comparative study on the impact of power sharing. / Thomson, Robert; Royed, Terry; Naurin, Elin; Artés, Joaquín; Costello, Rory; Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz; Ferguson, Mark; Kostadinova, Petia; Moury, Catherine; Pétry, François; Praprotnik, Katrin.

In: American Journal of Political Science, 06.06.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The fulfillment of parties' election pledges

T2 - American Journal of Political Science

AU - Thomson, Robert

AU - Royed, Terry

AU - Naurin, Elin

AU - Artés, Joaquín

AU - Costello, Rory

AU - Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz

AU - Ferguson, Mark

AU - Kostadinova, Petia

AU - Moury, Catherine

AU - Pétry, François

AU - Praprotnik, Katrin

PY - 2017/6/6

Y1 - 2017/6/6

N2 - Why are some parties more likely than others to keep the promises they made during previous election campaigns? This study provides the first comparative analysis that addresses this question with common definitions of pledges and fulfillment. We study the fulfillment of 18,743 pledges made in 54 election campaigns in 12 countries. We find high levels of pledge fulfillment for most parties that enter the government executive, and substantially lower levels for parties that do not. The findings challenge the common view of parties as promise breakers. The degree to which governing parties share power affects pledge fulfillment, with parties in single-party executives, both with and without legislative majorities, having the highest fulfillment rates. Within coalition governments, the likelihood of pledge fulfillment depends on whether the party receives the chief executive post and whether another governing party made a similar pledge, but not on the ideological range of the coalition.

AB - Why are some parties more likely than others to keep the promises they made during previous election campaigns? This study provides the first comparative analysis that addresses this question with common definitions of pledges and fulfillment. We study the fulfillment of 18,743 pledges made in 54 election campaigns in 12 countries. We find high levels of pledge fulfillment for most parties that enter the government executive, and substantially lower levels for parties that do not. The findings challenge the common view of parties as promise breakers. The degree to which governing parties share power affects pledge fulfillment, with parties in single-party executives, both with and without legislative majorities, having the highest fulfillment rates. Within coalition governments, the likelihood of pledge fulfillment depends on whether the party receives the chief executive post and whether another governing party made a similar pledge, but not on the ideological range of the coalition.

KW - power sharing

KW - election pledges

KW - election campaigns

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-5907

U2 - 10.1111/ajps.12313

DO - 10.1111/ajps.12313

M3 - Article

JO - American Journal of Political Science

JF - American Journal of Political Science

SN - 0092-5853

ER -