The failure of recall to prison: early release, front-door and back-door sentencing and the revolving prison door in Scotland

Beth Weaver, Cyrus Tata, Mary Munro, Monica Barry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article seeks to explain the reasons for the sharp rise in prison recall rates in Scotland. It argues that recall practices need to be understood not as a technical corner of the justice system, but as part of a wider analysis of the politics of sentencing and release policy. While there are sound reasons for a policy of ‘early release’ (incentivizing good behavior and enabling the resettlement of prisoners), in practice early release has increasingly been used as a tool to try to limit the growth in the custodial population. Unable to control prison numbers through the ‘front door’ (judicial sentencing and bail/remand), successive governments have increasingly relied on early release as a surreptitious way of, in effect, re-sentencing prisoners. We argue that this political strategy is ultimately self-defeating, not least in feeding public cynicism about the penal system and community supervision in particular. This article reviews the changing legislative, policy and practice landscape of the regulation of non-compliance and recall practice, and draws on the desistance literature to illustrate how offender-supervisor relationships can be undermined by recall policies which threaten the legitimacy of both the supervisory relationship and the conditions of supervision orders.
LanguageEnglish
Pages85-98
Number of pages14
JournalEuropean Journal of Probation
Volume4
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

correctional institution
prisoner
supervision
bail
political strategy
resettlement
offender
legitimacy
justice
regulation
politics
community

Keywords

  • custody
  • desistance
  • early release
  • parole
  • remission
  • sentencing

Cite this

@article{5c4a6651081f4070a21ea49fcd756f3e,
title = "The failure of recall to prison: early release, front-door and back-door sentencing and the revolving prison door in Scotland",
abstract = "This article seeks to explain the reasons for the sharp rise in prison recall rates in Scotland. It argues that recall practices need to be understood not as a technical corner of the justice system, but as part of a wider analysis of the politics of sentencing and release policy. While there are sound reasons for a policy of ‘early release’ (incentivizing good behavior and enabling the resettlement of prisoners), in practice early release has increasingly been used as a tool to try to limit the growth in the custodial population. Unable to control prison numbers through the ‘front door’ (judicial sentencing and bail/remand), successive governments have increasingly relied on early release as a surreptitious way of, in effect, re-sentencing prisoners. We argue that this political strategy is ultimately self-defeating, not least in feeding public cynicism about the penal system and community supervision in particular. This article reviews the changing legislative, policy and practice landscape of the regulation of non-compliance and recall practice, and draws on the desistance literature to illustrate how offender-supervisor relationships can be undermined by recall policies which threaten the legitimacy of both the supervisory relationship and the conditions of supervision orders.",
keywords = "custody, desistance, early release, parole, remission, sentencing",
author = "Beth Weaver and Cyrus Tata and Mary Munro and Monica Barry",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "85--98",
journal = "European Journal of Probation",
issn = "2066-2203",
number = "1",

}

The failure of recall to prison : early release, front-door and back-door sentencing and the revolving prison door in Scotland. / Weaver, Beth; Tata, Cyrus; Munro, Mary; Barry, Monica.

In: European Journal of Probation, Vol. 4, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 85-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The failure of recall to prison

T2 - European Journal of Probation

AU - Weaver, Beth

AU - Tata, Cyrus

AU - Munro, Mary

AU - Barry, Monica

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - This article seeks to explain the reasons for the sharp rise in prison recall rates in Scotland. It argues that recall practices need to be understood not as a technical corner of the justice system, but as part of a wider analysis of the politics of sentencing and release policy. While there are sound reasons for a policy of ‘early release’ (incentivizing good behavior and enabling the resettlement of prisoners), in practice early release has increasingly been used as a tool to try to limit the growth in the custodial population. Unable to control prison numbers through the ‘front door’ (judicial sentencing and bail/remand), successive governments have increasingly relied on early release as a surreptitious way of, in effect, re-sentencing prisoners. We argue that this political strategy is ultimately self-defeating, not least in feeding public cynicism about the penal system and community supervision in particular. This article reviews the changing legislative, policy and practice landscape of the regulation of non-compliance and recall practice, and draws on the desistance literature to illustrate how offender-supervisor relationships can be undermined by recall policies which threaten the legitimacy of both the supervisory relationship and the conditions of supervision orders.

AB - This article seeks to explain the reasons for the sharp rise in prison recall rates in Scotland. It argues that recall practices need to be understood not as a technical corner of the justice system, but as part of a wider analysis of the politics of sentencing and release policy. While there are sound reasons for a policy of ‘early release’ (incentivizing good behavior and enabling the resettlement of prisoners), in practice early release has increasingly been used as a tool to try to limit the growth in the custodial population. Unable to control prison numbers through the ‘front door’ (judicial sentencing and bail/remand), successive governments have increasingly relied on early release as a surreptitious way of, in effect, re-sentencing prisoners. We argue that this political strategy is ultimately self-defeating, not least in feeding public cynicism about the penal system and community supervision in particular. This article reviews the changing legislative, policy and practice landscape of the regulation of non-compliance and recall practice, and draws on the desistance literature to illustrate how offender-supervisor relationships can be undermined by recall policies which threaten the legitimacy of both the supervisory relationship and the conditions of supervision orders.

KW - custody

KW - desistance

KW - early release

KW - parole

KW - remission

KW - sentencing

UR - http://www.ejprob.ro/index.pl/the_failure_of_recall_to_prison_early_release_front-door_and_back-door_sentencing_and_the_revolving_prison_door_in_scotland

UR - http://www.ejprob.ro/uploads_ro/757/Scotland.pdf

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 85

EP - 98

JO - European Journal of Probation

JF - European Journal of Probation

SN - 2066-2203

IS - 1

ER -