The evaluation of EU cohesion policy: Research questions and policy challenges

J.F. Bachtler, C. Wren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

85 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The first part (Leonardi; Mairate) provides overviews from different perspectives on the rationale for EU Cohesion policy and its effects, including 'added value'. The second part (Batterbury; Bradley; Martin and Tyler) provides a critical assessment of Cohesion policy evaluation, focusing on the current regulatory framework. It examines contrasting macro-based approaches for determining the effect of policy, comprising a model-based approach to ex-ante evaluate the Structural Funds and a shift-share, residual-based method to evaluate interventions in Objective 1 regions. This part offers a new estimate of the employment effect of Cohesion policy. The third part (Florio; Baslæ#169;; Blazek and Vozáb; Eser and Nussmueller; Armstrong and Wells) examines the evaluation experience in a variety of circumstances, including different policy measures (Structural Funds, Community Initiatives and Cohesion Fund) and different kinds of evaluation (ex-ante, mid-term and ex-post).3 It explores other issues such as the use of cost-benefit analysis, the evaluation of community economic development (CED) initiatives and the preparation of programming documents in a new Member State. Finally, the fourth part has shorter contributions (Barca; Huber; Jakoby; Raines) that take a policy-maker perspective on evaluation culture in a variety of EU regions and countries.
LanguageEnglish
Pages143-153
Number of pages10
JournalRegional Studies
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2006

Fingerprint

research policy
group cohesion
cohesion
EU
evaluation
effect on employment
cost-benefit analysis
value added
regulatory framework
community
programming
policy
economic development
well
economics
experience
effect

Keywords

  • international trade
  • labour economics
  • planning
  • urban economics
  • urban policy
  • urban studies
  • regional development
  • cohesion policy

Cite this

@article{bea649bc0bea4654be271c2eb2a1f3eb,
title = "The evaluation of EU cohesion policy: Research questions and policy challenges",
abstract = "The first part (Leonardi; Mairate) provides overviews from different perspectives on the rationale for EU Cohesion policy and its effects, including 'added value'. The second part (Batterbury; Bradley; Martin and Tyler) provides a critical assessment of Cohesion policy evaluation, focusing on the current regulatory framework. It examines contrasting macro-based approaches for determining the effect of policy, comprising a model-based approach to ex-ante evaluate the Structural Funds and a shift-share, residual-based method to evaluate interventions in Objective 1 regions. This part offers a new estimate of the employment effect of Cohesion policy. The third part (Florio; Basl{\ae}#169;; Blazek and Voz{\'a}b; Eser and Nussmueller; Armstrong and Wells) examines the evaluation experience in a variety of circumstances, including different policy measures (Structural Funds, Community Initiatives and Cohesion Fund) and different kinds of evaluation (ex-ante, mid-term and ex-post).3 It explores other issues such as the use of cost-benefit analysis, the evaluation of community economic development (CED) initiatives and the preparation of programming documents in a new Member State. Finally, the fourth part has shorter contributions (Barca; Huber; Jakoby; Raines) that take a policy-maker perspective on evaluation culture in a variety of EU regions and countries.",
keywords = "international trade, labour economics, planning, urban economics, urban policy, urban studies, regional development, cohesion policy",
author = "J.F. Bachtler and C. Wren",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1080/00343400600600454",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "143--153",
journal = "Regional Studies",
issn = "0034-3404",
number = "2",

}

The evaluation of EU cohesion policy : Research questions and policy challenges. / Bachtler, J.F.; Wren, C.

In: Regional Studies, Vol. 40, No. 2, 04.2006, p. 143-153.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The evaluation of EU cohesion policy

T2 - Regional Studies

AU - Bachtler, J.F.

AU - Wren, C.

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - The first part (Leonardi; Mairate) provides overviews from different perspectives on the rationale for EU Cohesion policy and its effects, including 'added value'. The second part (Batterbury; Bradley; Martin and Tyler) provides a critical assessment of Cohesion policy evaluation, focusing on the current regulatory framework. It examines contrasting macro-based approaches for determining the effect of policy, comprising a model-based approach to ex-ante evaluate the Structural Funds and a shift-share, residual-based method to evaluate interventions in Objective 1 regions. This part offers a new estimate of the employment effect of Cohesion policy. The third part (Florio; Baslæ#169;; Blazek and Vozáb; Eser and Nussmueller; Armstrong and Wells) examines the evaluation experience in a variety of circumstances, including different policy measures (Structural Funds, Community Initiatives and Cohesion Fund) and different kinds of evaluation (ex-ante, mid-term and ex-post).3 It explores other issues such as the use of cost-benefit analysis, the evaluation of community economic development (CED) initiatives and the preparation of programming documents in a new Member State. Finally, the fourth part has shorter contributions (Barca; Huber; Jakoby; Raines) that take a policy-maker perspective on evaluation culture in a variety of EU regions and countries.

AB - The first part (Leonardi; Mairate) provides overviews from different perspectives on the rationale for EU Cohesion policy and its effects, including 'added value'. The second part (Batterbury; Bradley; Martin and Tyler) provides a critical assessment of Cohesion policy evaluation, focusing on the current regulatory framework. It examines contrasting macro-based approaches for determining the effect of policy, comprising a model-based approach to ex-ante evaluate the Structural Funds and a shift-share, residual-based method to evaluate interventions in Objective 1 regions. This part offers a new estimate of the employment effect of Cohesion policy. The third part (Florio; Baslæ#169;; Blazek and Vozáb; Eser and Nussmueller; Armstrong and Wells) examines the evaluation experience in a variety of circumstances, including different policy measures (Structural Funds, Community Initiatives and Cohesion Fund) and different kinds of evaluation (ex-ante, mid-term and ex-post).3 It explores other issues such as the use of cost-benefit analysis, the evaluation of community economic development (CED) initiatives and the preparation of programming documents in a new Member State. Finally, the fourth part has shorter contributions (Barca; Huber; Jakoby; Raines) that take a policy-maker perspective on evaluation culture in a variety of EU regions and countries.

KW - international trade

KW - labour economics

KW - planning

KW - urban economics

KW - urban policy

KW - urban studies

KW - regional development

KW - cohesion policy

UR - http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all?content=10.1080/00343400600600454

U2 - 10.1080/00343400600600454

DO - 10.1080/00343400600600454

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 143

EP - 153

JO - Regional Studies

JF - Regional Studies

SN - 0034-3404

IS - 2

ER -