The efficient use of non-renewable resources

David R. F. Simpson, David N.F. Bell (Editor)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Economists since at least the time of Adam Smith have regarded the progress of human societies over time as a race between technical invention on the one hand and limited natural resources on the other. But the importance which they have attached to this problem has fluctuated. The concern which existed amongst economists in early 19th century Britain evaporated with the arrival from North America of supplies of low-priced corn, made possible by a combination of virgin lands. The issue has once again been brought to the forefront of public attention by some recent much publicised suggestions (eg Meadows, 1972, WAES 1977) that the world as a whole may be running out of supplies of a particular class of natural resources, those which are exhaustible or non-renewable. While depletion of these stocks in a physical sense seems indeniable, most contemporary economists have been inclined to accept the fragmentary empirical evidence available which suggests that there has not been depletion in an economic sense. Technical change, economies of scale, and product-factor substitution have meant that extractive commodities have over the past ICO years or so become less scarce in terms of the sacrifices required to obtain them, (Peterson & Fisher, 1977). Nevertheless, a number of economists, (Dasgupta & Heal, 1974, Pearce, 1976 and Koopmans, 1976) have in the last five years turned their attention to the question: at what rate should the non-renewable resources of a society be depleted? They have treated this question as an extension of a related question, already well established in the literature of economics: at what rate should the renewable resources of a society be accumulated, ie what is the optimal rate of investment over time? The answers traditionally given to these questions involve the maximisation of a sum of utility flows to be derived from future consumption. The principal parameters which occur in the models devised to answer such questions concern the substitutability between factors of production, the rate and character of technical change, uncertainty and utility.
LanguageEnglish
Pages44-48
Number of pages5
JournalQuarterly Economic Commentary
Volume5
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1979
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Natural resources
Economics
Patents and inventions
Substitution reactions
Non-renewable resources
Economists
Uncertainty
Depletion
Technical change

Keywords

  • energy economics
  • non-renewable energy
  • North Sea oil
  • Scottish economy

Cite this

Simpson, D. R. F., & Bell, D. N. F. (Ed.) (1979). The efficient use of non-renewable resources. Quarterly Economic Commentary, 5(1), 44-48.
Simpson, David R. F. ; Bell, David N.F. (Editor). / The efficient use of non-renewable resources. In: Quarterly Economic Commentary. 1979 ; Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 44-48.
@article{ce83070bfebe40fea95e08291cd1d515,
title = "The efficient use of non-renewable resources",
abstract = "Economists since at least the time of Adam Smith have regarded the progress of human societies over time as a race between technical invention on the one hand and limited natural resources on the other. But the importance which they have attached to this problem has fluctuated. The concern which existed amongst economists in early 19th century Britain evaporated with the arrival from North America of supplies of low-priced corn, made possible by a combination of virgin lands. The issue has once again been brought to the forefront of public attention by some recent much publicised suggestions (eg Meadows, 1972, WAES 1977) that the world as a whole may be running out of supplies of a particular class of natural resources, those which are exhaustible or non-renewable. While depletion of these stocks in a physical sense seems indeniable, most contemporary economists have been inclined to accept the fragmentary empirical evidence available which suggests that there has not been depletion in an economic sense. Technical change, economies of scale, and product-factor substitution have meant that extractive commodities have over the past ICO years or so become less scarce in terms of the sacrifices required to obtain them, (Peterson & Fisher, 1977). Nevertheless, a number of economists, (Dasgupta & Heal, 1974, Pearce, 1976 and Koopmans, 1976) have in the last five years turned their attention to the question: at what rate should the non-renewable resources of a society be depleted? They have treated this question as an extension of a related question, already well established in the literature of economics: at what rate should the renewable resources of a society be accumulated, ie what is the optimal rate of investment over time? The answers traditionally given to these questions involve the maximisation of a sum of utility flows to be derived from future consumption. The principal parameters which occur in the models devised to answer such questions concern the substitutability between factors of production, the rate and character of technical change, uncertainty and utility.",
keywords = "energy economics, non-renewable energy, North Sea oil, Scottish economy",
author = "Simpson, {David R. F.} and Bell, {David N.F.}",
year = "1979",
month = "7",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "44--48",
journal = "Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary",
issn = "2046-5378",
publisher = "University of Strathclyde",
number = "1",

}

Simpson, DRF & Bell, DNF (ed.) 1979, 'The efficient use of non-renewable resources' Quarterly Economic Commentary, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 44-48.

The efficient use of non-renewable resources. / Simpson, David R. F.; Bell, David N.F. (Editor).

In: Quarterly Economic Commentary, Vol. 5, No. 1, 07.1979, p. 44-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The efficient use of non-renewable resources

AU - Simpson, David R. F.

A2 - Bell, David N.F.

PY - 1979/7

Y1 - 1979/7

N2 - Economists since at least the time of Adam Smith have regarded the progress of human societies over time as a race between technical invention on the one hand and limited natural resources on the other. But the importance which they have attached to this problem has fluctuated. The concern which existed amongst economists in early 19th century Britain evaporated with the arrival from North America of supplies of low-priced corn, made possible by a combination of virgin lands. The issue has once again been brought to the forefront of public attention by some recent much publicised suggestions (eg Meadows, 1972, WAES 1977) that the world as a whole may be running out of supplies of a particular class of natural resources, those which are exhaustible or non-renewable. While depletion of these stocks in a physical sense seems indeniable, most contemporary economists have been inclined to accept the fragmentary empirical evidence available which suggests that there has not been depletion in an economic sense. Technical change, economies of scale, and product-factor substitution have meant that extractive commodities have over the past ICO years or so become less scarce in terms of the sacrifices required to obtain them, (Peterson & Fisher, 1977). Nevertheless, a number of economists, (Dasgupta & Heal, 1974, Pearce, 1976 and Koopmans, 1976) have in the last five years turned their attention to the question: at what rate should the non-renewable resources of a society be depleted? They have treated this question as an extension of a related question, already well established in the literature of economics: at what rate should the renewable resources of a society be accumulated, ie what is the optimal rate of investment over time? The answers traditionally given to these questions involve the maximisation of a sum of utility flows to be derived from future consumption. The principal parameters which occur in the models devised to answer such questions concern the substitutability between factors of production, the rate and character of technical change, uncertainty and utility.

AB - Economists since at least the time of Adam Smith have regarded the progress of human societies over time as a race between technical invention on the one hand and limited natural resources on the other. But the importance which they have attached to this problem has fluctuated. The concern which existed amongst economists in early 19th century Britain evaporated with the arrival from North America of supplies of low-priced corn, made possible by a combination of virgin lands. The issue has once again been brought to the forefront of public attention by some recent much publicised suggestions (eg Meadows, 1972, WAES 1977) that the world as a whole may be running out of supplies of a particular class of natural resources, those which are exhaustible or non-renewable. While depletion of these stocks in a physical sense seems indeniable, most contemporary economists have been inclined to accept the fragmentary empirical evidence available which suggests that there has not been depletion in an economic sense. Technical change, economies of scale, and product-factor substitution have meant that extractive commodities have over the past ICO years or so become less scarce in terms of the sacrifices required to obtain them, (Peterson & Fisher, 1977). Nevertheless, a number of economists, (Dasgupta & Heal, 1974, Pearce, 1976 and Koopmans, 1976) have in the last five years turned their attention to the question: at what rate should the non-renewable resources of a society be depleted? They have treated this question as an extension of a related question, already well established in the literature of economics: at what rate should the renewable resources of a society be accumulated, ie what is the optimal rate of investment over time? The answers traditionally given to these questions involve the maximisation of a sum of utility flows to be derived from future consumption. The principal parameters which occur in the models devised to answer such questions concern the substitutability between factors of production, the rate and character of technical change, uncertainty and utility.

KW - energy economics

KW - non-renewable energy

KW - North Sea oil

KW - Scottish economy

UR - http://www.strath.ac.uk/frasercommentary/

UR - http://www.strath.ac.uk/fraser/

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 44

EP - 48

JO - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

T2 - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

JF - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

SN - 2046-5378

IS - 1

ER -

Simpson DRF, Bell DNF, (ed.). The efficient use of non-renewable resources. Quarterly Economic Commentary. 1979 Jul;5(1):44-48.