The Effectiveness of EU Cohesion Policy Revisited: are EU Funds Really Additional?

Peter Wostner, Sonja Šlander

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned report

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Is Cohesion policy effective? Does it contribute to the reduction of development disparities and strengthen competitiveness in the EU? These are the questions that have inspired a growing body of research on Cohesion policy evaluation, which has come to varied and inconclusive results. There has been significant variation with regards to the established (in) effectiveness of Cohesion policy among different methodological approaches. Ideally, the econometric tests would be able to provide conclusive results, which would represent the most convincing empirical proof. Unfortunately, the nature of Cohesion policy itself is posing serious limitations to the econometric approach, which has usually been limited to the direct testing of the macroeconomic impact of the resources. In order to circumvent these shortcomings, the authors have continued to rely on the econometric methods, but have nevertheless proved the benefits of using an indirect estimation approach. They have confirmed that Cohesion policy effectively increases the structural expenditures of the recipient Member States, thereby fulfilling one of the necessary conditions for effectiveness of EU transfers. Overall, effectiveness still depends on other conditions, among which the micro-efficiency of funds' management and their effect on private investment stand out in particular.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationGlasgow
PublisherUniversity of Strathclyde
Number of pages32
ISBN (Print)1-871130-75-1
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2009

Fingerprint

group cohesion
EU
econometrics
private investment
macroeconomics
competitiveness
expenditures
recipient
efficiency
evaluation
management
resources

Keywords

  • cohesion policy
  • EU funds
  • policy evaluation

Cite this

Wostner, P., & Šlander, S. (2009). The Effectiveness of EU Cohesion Policy Revisited: are EU Funds Really Additional? . Glasgow: University of Strathclyde.
Wostner, Peter ; Šlander, Sonja. / The Effectiveness of EU Cohesion Policy Revisited : are EU Funds Really Additional? . Glasgow : University of Strathclyde, 2009. 32 p.
@book{70432259b7cb4c7483340e71893b65cf,
title = "The Effectiveness of EU Cohesion Policy Revisited: are EU Funds Really Additional?",
abstract = "Is Cohesion policy effective? Does it contribute to the reduction of development disparities and strengthen competitiveness in the EU? These are the questions that have inspired a growing body of research on Cohesion policy evaluation, which has come to varied and inconclusive results. There has been significant variation with regards to the established (in) effectiveness of Cohesion policy among different methodological approaches. Ideally, the econometric tests would be able to provide conclusive results, which would represent the most convincing empirical proof. Unfortunately, the nature of Cohesion policy itself is posing serious limitations to the econometric approach, which has usually been limited to the direct testing of the macroeconomic impact of the resources. In order to circumvent these shortcomings, the authors have continued to rely on the econometric methods, but have nevertheless proved the benefits of using an indirect estimation approach. They have confirmed that Cohesion policy effectively increases the structural expenditures of the recipient Member States, thereby fulfilling one of the necessary conditions for effectiveness of EU transfers. Overall, effectiveness still depends on other conditions, among which the micro-efficiency of funds' management and their effect on private investment stand out in particular.",
keywords = "cohesion policy, EU funds, policy evaluation",
author = "Peter Wostner and Sonja Šlander",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
language = "English",
isbn = "1-871130-75-1",
publisher = "University of Strathclyde",

}

Wostner, P & Šlander, S 2009, The Effectiveness of EU Cohesion Policy Revisited: are EU Funds Really Additional? . University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.

The Effectiveness of EU Cohesion Policy Revisited : are EU Funds Really Additional? . / Wostner, Peter; Šlander, Sonja.

Glasgow : University of Strathclyde, 2009. 32 p.

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned report

TY - BOOK

T1 - The Effectiveness of EU Cohesion Policy Revisited

T2 - are EU Funds Really Additional?

AU - Wostner, Peter

AU - Šlander, Sonja

PY - 2009/11

Y1 - 2009/11

N2 - Is Cohesion policy effective? Does it contribute to the reduction of development disparities and strengthen competitiveness in the EU? These are the questions that have inspired a growing body of research on Cohesion policy evaluation, which has come to varied and inconclusive results. There has been significant variation with regards to the established (in) effectiveness of Cohesion policy among different methodological approaches. Ideally, the econometric tests would be able to provide conclusive results, which would represent the most convincing empirical proof. Unfortunately, the nature of Cohesion policy itself is posing serious limitations to the econometric approach, which has usually been limited to the direct testing of the macroeconomic impact of the resources. In order to circumvent these shortcomings, the authors have continued to rely on the econometric methods, but have nevertheless proved the benefits of using an indirect estimation approach. They have confirmed that Cohesion policy effectively increases the structural expenditures of the recipient Member States, thereby fulfilling one of the necessary conditions for effectiveness of EU transfers. Overall, effectiveness still depends on other conditions, among which the micro-efficiency of funds' management and their effect on private investment stand out in particular.

AB - Is Cohesion policy effective? Does it contribute to the reduction of development disparities and strengthen competitiveness in the EU? These are the questions that have inspired a growing body of research on Cohesion policy evaluation, which has come to varied and inconclusive results. There has been significant variation with regards to the established (in) effectiveness of Cohesion policy among different methodological approaches. Ideally, the econometric tests would be able to provide conclusive results, which would represent the most convincing empirical proof. Unfortunately, the nature of Cohesion policy itself is posing serious limitations to the econometric approach, which has usually been limited to the direct testing of the macroeconomic impact of the resources. In order to circumvent these shortcomings, the authors have continued to rely on the econometric methods, but have nevertheless proved the benefits of using an indirect estimation approach. They have confirmed that Cohesion policy effectively increases the structural expenditures of the recipient Member States, thereby fulfilling one of the necessary conditions for effectiveness of EU transfers. Overall, effectiveness still depends on other conditions, among which the micro-efficiency of funds' management and their effect on private investment stand out in particular.

KW - cohesion policy

KW - EU funds

KW - policy evaluation

M3 - Commissioned report

SN - 1-871130-75-1

BT - The Effectiveness of EU Cohesion Policy Revisited

PB - University of Strathclyde

CY - Glasgow

ER -

Wostner P, Šlander S. The Effectiveness of EU Cohesion Policy Revisited: are EU Funds Really Additional? . Glasgow: University of Strathclyde, 2009. 32 p.