The effect of the national minimum wage on the UK small business sector: a geographical analysis

Colin M. Mason, Sara Carter, Stephen K. Tagg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A national minimum wage (NMW) was introduced into the United Kingdom in 1999 as part of New Labour's active labour-market approach. The level has been uprated on several occasions since then. Most research suggests that the NMW has benefited low-paid workers while having little adverse impact on employment levels. This paper explores the regional impact of the NMW on the small business sector, using data from the Federation of Small Businesses' biennial survey, the largest business survey in the United Kingdom. Overall, just over 21% of businesses with employees uprated employees and just under 10% of employees have benefited from pay uprates. The impact has varied across industries, with the greatest effects in the hotels and catering sector. In general, affected businesses have anticipated that they would be able to absorb the costs, although in some cases at the expense of a slight decline in profitability. The impact of the NMW also varies across the regions, having the least impact in London and the South East and the greatest impact in the 'north'. In the northern regions, businesses are less able to absorb the increased costs and more likely to respond by increasing prices. This has potential implications for the competitiveness of small and medium-sized enterprises in these regions, which is more likely to be based around price and cost advantages than their counterparts in the south. The Low Pay Commission therefore should give greater attention to the geographical impacts of the NMW in its evaluation and when proposing future increases in the rate.
LanguageEnglish
Pages99-116
Number of pages17
JournalEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2006

Fingerprint

minimum wage
small business
employee
cost
costs
small and medium-sized enterprise
profitability
competitiveness
labor market
New Labour
effect
analysis
federation
labor
industry
worker
evaluation

Keywords

  • minimum wage
  • business
  • small business sector
  • low pay

Cite this

@article{90b3ad7cc6cb4745b5eed7cbf268e078,
title = "The effect of the national minimum wage on the UK small business sector: a geographical analysis",
abstract = "A national minimum wage (NMW) was introduced into the United Kingdom in 1999 as part of New Labour's active labour-market approach. The level has been uprated on several occasions since then. Most research suggests that the NMW has benefited low-paid workers while having little adverse impact on employment levels. This paper explores the regional impact of the NMW on the small business sector, using data from the Federation of Small Businesses' biennial survey, the largest business survey in the United Kingdom. Overall, just over 21{\%} of businesses with employees uprated employees and just under 10{\%} of employees have benefited from pay uprates. The impact has varied across industries, with the greatest effects in the hotels and catering sector. In general, affected businesses have anticipated that they would be able to absorb the costs, although in some cases at the expense of a slight decline in profitability. The impact of the NMW also varies across the regions, having the least impact in London and the South East and the greatest impact in the 'north'. In the northern regions, businesses are less able to absorb the increased costs and more likely to respond by increasing prices. This has potential implications for the competitiveness of small and medium-sized enterprises in these regions, which is more likely to be based around price and cost advantages than their counterparts in the south. The Low Pay Commission therefore should give greater attention to the geographical impacts of the NMW in its evaluation and when proposing future increases in the rate.",
keywords = "minimum wage, business, small business sector, low pay",
author = "Mason, {Colin M.} and Sara Carter and Tagg, {Stephen K.}",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1068/c0541",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "99--116",
journal = "Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy",
issn = "1472-3425",
number = "1",

}

The effect of the national minimum wage on the UK small business sector : a geographical analysis. / Mason, Colin M.; Carter, Sara; Tagg, Stephen K.

In: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.02.2006, p. 99-116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of the national minimum wage on the UK small business sector

T2 - Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy

AU - Mason, Colin M.

AU - Carter, Sara

AU - Tagg, Stephen K.

PY - 2006/2/1

Y1 - 2006/2/1

N2 - A national minimum wage (NMW) was introduced into the United Kingdom in 1999 as part of New Labour's active labour-market approach. The level has been uprated on several occasions since then. Most research suggests that the NMW has benefited low-paid workers while having little adverse impact on employment levels. This paper explores the regional impact of the NMW on the small business sector, using data from the Federation of Small Businesses' biennial survey, the largest business survey in the United Kingdom. Overall, just over 21% of businesses with employees uprated employees and just under 10% of employees have benefited from pay uprates. The impact has varied across industries, with the greatest effects in the hotels and catering sector. In general, affected businesses have anticipated that they would be able to absorb the costs, although in some cases at the expense of a slight decline in profitability. The impact of the NMW also varies across the regions, having the least impact in London and the South East and the greatest impact in the 'north'. In the northern regions, businesses are less able to absorb the increased costs and more likely to respond by increasing prices. This has potential implications for the competitiveness of small and medium-sized enterprises in these regions, which is more likely to be based around price and cost advantages than their counterparts in the south. The Low Pay Commission therefore should give greater attention to the geographical impacts of the NMW in its evaluation and when proposing future increases in the rate.

AB - A national minimum wage (NMW) was introduced into the United Kingdom in 1999 as part of New Labour's active labour-market approach. The level has been uprated on several occasions since then. Most research suggests that the NMW has benefited low-paid workers while having little adverse impact on employment levels. This paper explores the regional impact of the NMW on the small business sector, using data from the Federation of Small Businesses' biennial survey, the largest business survey in the United Kingdom. Overall, just over 21% of businesses with employees uprated employees and just under 10% of employees have benefited from pay uprates. The impact has varied across industries, with the greatest effects in the hotels and catering sector. In general, affected businesses have anticipated that they would be able to absorb the costs, although in some cases at the expense of a slight decline in profitability. The impact of the NMW also varies across the regions, having the least impact in London and the South East and the greatest impact in the 'north'. In the northern regions, businesses are less able to absorb the increased costs and more likely to respond by increasing prices. This has potential implications for the competitiveness of small and medium-sized enterprises in these regions, which is more likely to be based around price and cost advantages than their counterparts in the south. The Low Pay Commission therefore should give greater attention to the geographical impacts of the NMW in its evaluation and when proposing future increases in the rate.

KW - minimum wage

KW - business

KW - small business sector

KW - low pay

UR - https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1068/c0541

U2 - 10.1068/c0541

DO - 10.1068/c0541

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 99

EP - 116

JO - Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy

JF - Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy

SN - 1472-3425

IS - 1

ER -