The dynamics of common law evolution

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In Commonwealth Bank of Australia v. Barker [2014] HCA 32 (Barker) the High Court of Australia held that the implied term of mutual trust and confidence was not part of the law of the employment contract in Australia.This article considers the impact that the decision will have on the position of employees at common law and on the way that the law is likely to develop. It suggests that the impact of Barker may be marginalized by the ever increasing importance of good faith in the law of contract and that in assessing the extent to which the common law affords protection for the interests of employees it is imperative to take account of the obligations imposed by the law of tort. Finally, the article explores the dynamics of common law evolution more generally through the prism of Barker. It is suggested that two key factors in determining the manner in which the law develops are the values espoused by the common law and the extent to which statute is allowed to act as a constraint rather than treated as a catalyst.
LanguageEnglish
Pages45-68
Number of pages24
JournalInternational Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations
Volume32
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2016

Fingerprint

common law
Law
employee
law of obligations
employment contract
statute
faith
obligation
bank
confidence
Values

Keywords

  • common law
  • labour law
  • industrial relations

Cite this

@article{0710bd9dbf4e44b188da679f05bcdb0a,
title = "The dynamics of common law evolution",
abstract = "In Commonwealth Bank of Australia v. Barker [2014] HCA 32 (Barker) the High Court of Australia held that the implied term of mutual trust and confidence was not part of the law of the employment contract in Australia.This article considers the impact that the decision will have on the position of employees at common law and on the way that the law is likely to develop. It suggests that the impact of Barker may be marginalized by the ever increasing importance of good faith in the law of contract and that in assessing the extent to which the common law affords protection for the interests of employees it is imperative to take account of the obligations imposed by the law of tort. Finally, the article explores the dynamics of common law evolution more generally through the prism of Barker. It is suggested that two key factors in determining the manner in which the law develops are the values espoused by the common law and the extent to which statute is allowed to act as a constraint rather than treated as a catalyst.",
keywords = "common law, labour law , industrial relations",
author = "Douglas Brodie",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "45--68",
journal = "International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations",
issn = "0952-617X",
number = "1",

}

The dynamics of common law evolution. / Brodie, Douglas.

In: International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, Vol. 32, No. 1, 01.03.2016, p. 45-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The dynamics of common law evolution

AU - Brodie, Douglas

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - In Commonwealth Bank of Australia v. Barker [2014] HCA 32 (Barker) the High Court of Australia held that the implied term of mutual trust and confidence was not part of the law of the employment contract in Australia.This article considers the impact that the decision will have on the position of employees at common law and on the way that the law is likely to develop. It suggests that the impact of Barker may be marginalized by the ever increasing importance of good faith in the law of contract and that in assessing the extent to which the common law affords protection for the interests of employees it is imperative to take account of the obligations imposed by the law of tort. Finally, the article explores the dynamics of common law evolution more generally through the prism of Barker. It is suggested that two key factors in determining the manner in which the law develops are the values espoused by the common law and the extent to which statute is allowed to act as a constraint rather than treated as a catalyst.

AB - In Commonwealth Bank of Australia v. Barker [2014] HCA 32 (Barker) the High Court of Australia held that the implied term of mutual trust and confidence was not part of the law of the employment contract in Australia.This article considers the impact that the decision will have on the position of employees at common law and on the way that the law is likely to develop. It suggests that the impact of Barker may be marginalized by the ever increasing importance of good faith in the law of contract and that in assessing the extent to which the common law affords protection for the interests of employees it is imperative to take account of the obligations imposed by the law of tort. Finally, the article explores the dynamics of common law evolution more generally through the prism of Barker. It is suggested that two key factors in determining the manner in which the law develops are the values espoused by the common law and the extent to which statute is allowed to act as a constraint rather than treated as a catalyst.

KW - common law

KW - labour law

KW - industrial relations

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 45

EP - 68

JO - International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations

T2 - International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations

JF - International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations

SN - 0952-617X

IS - 1

ER -