The determinants of foreign exchange hedging in alternative investment market firms

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines the foreign exchange (FX) hedging by firms listed on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) in the UK to contribute to the empirical debate on the determinants of the FX hedging. Despite our selection criteria that all our firms have exposure to FX risk, we find that only around a third of our sample hedge their FX risk. Contrary to expectations, we find a significant negative relation between hedging and the extent of managerial ownership of the firm. This could be explained by the particular agency relations in AIM firms, the significant managerial ownership of these firms or managers’ overconfidence. We find that the larger of the AIM firms in our sample hedge more, indicating that despite the FX risks they face, some of the smaller AIM firms lack financial knowledge or understanding to deal with their potential FX risks. Finally, we find an industry effect in the decision to hedge as AIM firms in the basic material and financial sectors are less likely to hedge FX risk than other sectors Our results are robust to a number of further checks.
LanguageEnglish
Pages89-111
Number of pages23
JournalEuropean Journal of Finance
Volume19
Issue number2
Early online date18 Apr 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Alternative investments
Hedging
Foreign exchange
Hedge
Managerial ownership
Managers
Financial sector
Overconfidence
Financial knowledge
Industry effects
Selection criteria

Keywords

  • finance
  • foreign exchange
  • hedging
  • alternative investment market companies

Cite this

@article{e1c9eb329cea4ed5ac683f1a8fa87f3c,
title = "The determinants of foreign exchange hedging in alternative investment market firms",
abstract = "This paper examines the foreign exchange (FX) hedging by firms listed on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) in the UK to contribute to the empirical debate on the determinants of the FX hedging. Despite our selection criteria that all our firms have exposure to FX risk, we find that only around a third of our sample hedge their FX risk. Contrary to expectations, we find a significant negative relation between hedging and the extent of managerial ownership of the firm. This could be explained by the particular agency relations in AIM firms, the significant managerial ownership of these firms or managers’ overconfidence. We find that the larger of the AIM firms in our sample hedge more, indicating that despite the FX risks they face, some of the smaller AIM firms lack financial knowledge or understanding to deal with their potential FX risks. Finally, we find an industry effect in the decision to hedge as AIM firms in the basic material and financial sectors are less likely to hedge FX risk than other sectors Our results are robust to a number of further checks.",
keywords = "finance, foreign exchange, hedging, alternative investment market companies",
author = "Andrew Marshall and Martin Kemmitt and Helena Pinto",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/1351847X.2012.659267",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "89--111",
journal = "European Journal of Finance",
issn = "1351-847X",
number = "2",

}

The determinants of foreign exchange hedging in alternative investment market firms. / Marshall, Andrew; Kemmitt, Martin; Pinto, Helena.

In: European Journal of Finance, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2013, p. 89-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The determinants of foreign exchange hedging in alternative investment market firms

AU - Marshall, Andrew

AU - Kemmitt, Martin

AU - Pinto, Helena

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This paper examines the foreign exchange (FX) hedging by firms listed on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) in the UK to contribute to the empirical debate on the determinants of the FX hedging. Despite our selection criteria that all our firms have exposure to FX risk, we find that only around a third of our sample hedge their FX risk. Contrary to expectations, we find a significant negative relation between hedging and the extent of managerial ownership of the firm. This could be explained by the particular agency relations in AIM firms, the significant managerial ownership of these firms or managers’ overconfidence. We find that the larger of the AIM firms in our sample hedge more, indicating that despite the FX risks they face, some of the smaller AIM firms lack financial knowledge or understanding to deal with their potential FX risks. Finally, we find an industry effect in the decision to hedge as AIM firms in the basic material and financial sectors are less likely to hedge FX risk than other sectors Our results are robust to a number of further checks.

AB - This paper examines the foreign exchange (FX) hedging by firms listed on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) in the UK to contribute to the empirical debate on the determinants of the FX hedging. Despite our selection criteria that all our firms have exposure to FX risk, we find that only around a third of our sample hedge their FX risk. Contrary to expectations, we find a significant negative relation between hedging and the extent of managerial ownership of the firm. This could be explained by the particular agency relations in AIM firms, the significant managerial ownership of these firms or managers’ overconfidence. We find that the larger of the AIM firms in our sample hedge more, indicating that despite the FX risks they face, some of the smaller AIM firms lack financial knowledge or understanding to deal with their potential FX risks. Finally, we find an industry effect in the decision to hedge as AIM firms in the basic material and financial sectors are less likely to hedge FX risk than other sectors Our results are robust to a number of further checks.

KW - finance

KW - foreign exchange

KW - hedging

KW - alternative investment market companies

UR - http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/1351847X.asp

U2 - 10.1080/1351847X.2012.659267

DO - 10.1080/1351847X.2012.659267

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 89

EP - 111

JO - European Journal of Finance

T2 - European Journal of Finance

JF - European Journal of Finance

SN - 1351-847X

IS - 2

ER -