The cost of coal

David Simpson, Frank Kirwan (Editor)

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The organisation and finances of the National Coal Board as depicted in the recent report of the Monopolies and Mergers Commission makes devastating reading. The unemotional tone of the report lays bare a tale of mismanagement and incompetence. A comparison with the Soviet Union is suggested by the fact that the industry has apparently been run since nationalisation in 1947 like an industry in a planned economy, i.e with physical performance rather than financial indicators. As a consequence of the way in which the industry has been run, it has become a huge drain on the resources of the rest of society. This economic perspective considers all the costs of the Coal Board's mismanagement.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages63-65
    Number of pages3
    JournalQuarterly Economic Commentary
    Volume9
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - May 1984

    Fingerprint

    Costs
    Industry
    Economics
    Resources
    Planned economy
    Soviet Union
    Mergers
    Monopoly
    Financial indicators
    Finance
    Nationalization

    Keywords

    • National Coal Board
    • coal production
    • UK economy
    • industrial management

    Cite this

    Simpson, D., & Kirwan, F. (Ed.) (1984). The cost of coal. Quarterly Economic Commentary, 9(4), 63-65.
    Simpson, David ; Kirwan, Frank (Editor). / The cost of coal. In: Quarterly Economic Commentary. 1984 ; Vol. 9, No. 4. pp. 63-65.
    @article{6d79317b902c447bb4f1dcfc09e3c0e9,
    title = "The cost of coal",
    abstract = "The organisation and finances of the National Coal Board as depicted in the recent report of the Monopolies and Mergers Commission makes devastating reading. The unemotional tone of the report lays bare a tale of mismanagement and incompetence. A comparison with the Soviet Union is suggested by the fact that the industry has apparently been run since nationalisation in 1947 like an industry in a planned economy, i.e with physical performance rather than financial indicators. As a consequence of the way in which the industry has been run, it has become a huge drain on the resources of the rest of society. This economic perspective considers all the costs of the Coal Board's mismanagement.",
    keywords = "National Coal Board, coal production, UK economy, industrial management",
    author = "David Simpson and Frank Kirwan",
    year = "1984",
    month = "5",
    language = "English",
    volume = "9",
    pages = "63--65",
    journal = "Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary",
    issn = "2046-5378",
    publisher = "University of Strathclyde",
    number = "4",

    }

    Simpson, D & Kirwan, F (ed.) 1984, 'The cost of coal' Quarterly Economic Commentary, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 63-65.

    The cost of coal. / Simpson, David; Kirwan, Frank (Editor).

    In: Quarterly Economic Commentary, Vol. 9, No. 4, 05.1984, p. 63-65.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The cost of coal

    AU - Simpson, David

    A2 - Kirwan, Frank

    PY - 1984/5

    Y1 - 1984/5

    N2 - The organisation and finances of the National Coal Board as depicted in the recent report of the Monopolies and Mergers Commission makes devastating reading. The unemotional tone of the report lays bare a tale of mismanagement and incompetence. A comparison with the Soviet Union is suggested by the fact that the industry has apparently been run since nationalisation in 1947 like an industry in a planned economy, i.e with physical performance rather than financial indicators. As a consequence of the way in which the industry has been run, it has become a huge drain on the resources of the rest of society. This economic perspective considers all the costs of the Coal Board's mismanagement.

    AB - The organisation and finances of the National Coal Board as depicted in the recent report of the Monopolies and Mergers Commission makes devastating reading. The unemotional tone of the report lays bare a tale of mismanagement and incompetence. A comparison with the Soviet Union is suggested by the fact that the industry has apparently been run since nationalisation in 1947 like an industry in a planned economy, i.e with physical performance rather than financial indicators. As a consequence of the way in which the industry has been run, it has become a huge drain on the resources of the rest of society. This economic perspective considers all the costs of the Coal Board's mismanagement.

    KW - National Coal Board

    KW - coal production

    KW - UK economy

    KW - industrial management

    UR - http://www.strath.ac.uk/frasercommentary/

    UR - http://www.strath.ac.uk/fraser/

    M3 - Article

    VL - 9

    SP - 63

    EP - 65

    JO - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

    T2 - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

    JF - Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary

    SN - 2046-5378

    IS - 4

    ER -

    Simpson D, Kirwan F, (ed.). The cost of coal. Quarterly Economic Commentary. 1984 May;9(4):63-65.