The cornerstone of our law: equality, consistency, and judicial review

Michael Foran

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
30 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Equality before the law is a foundational principle of the common law and is of particular importance for administrative law, given the connection between judicial review and the rule of law. Analysis as to the precise requirements of this principle can help us better to understand the role that obligations to act consistently play within judicial review. This article will examine whether consistency ought to be classed as a separate ground of review and argue that this is unnecessary. Examination of the role that legal equality plays within common law reason generally will shed light on the role that it plays within administrative law in particular. Consistency is best conceived as a background principle, informed by the value of legal equality, housed within reasonableness review and not as a separate ground of review that could elide the distinction between review and appeal.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)249-272
Number of pages24
JournalThe Cambridge Law Journal
Volume81
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2022

Keywords

  • equality
  • consistency
  • administrative law
  • judicial review
  • common law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The cornerstone of our law: equality, consistency, and judicial review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this