The constitutional case for independence

Aileen McHarg

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The independence referendum arose out of an unanticipated set of political circumstances, rather than from a widely-felt and clearly-articulated sense of constitutional grievance. The referendum campaign was also conducted mainly in instrumental terms: dominated by arguments about the substantive policy consequences of independence, rather than overtly focused on Scotland’s governance arrangements. Nevertheless, this chapter argues that the instrumental case for independence was underpinned by a set of constitutional claims - about a democratic deficit; about effective governance; about the place of Scotland in the UK’s territorial constitution; and about the constitution of an independent Scotland –which in fact strongly echoed the constitutional case made for devolution a generation earlier. The chapter evaluates the strength of these arguments, arguing that there is a coherent, albeit not necessarily compelling, constitutional case to be made for independence – but one which seems likely to get stronger if post-referendum political and constitutional trends continue.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Scottish Independence Referendum
Subtitle of host publicationConstitutional and Political Implications
EditorsAileen McHarg, Tom Mullen, Alan Page, Neil Walker
Publication statusPublished - 23 Jun 2016

Fingerprint

referendum
constitution
governance
decentralization
deficit
campaign
trend

Keywords

  • independence
  • referendum
  • Scotland
  • constitution
  • democratic deficit
  • governance
  • devolution

Cite this

McHarg, A. (2016). The constitutional case for independence. In A. McHarg, T. Mullen, A. Page, & N. Walker (Eds.), The Scottish Independence Referendum: Constitutional and Political Implications
McHarg, Aileen. / The constitutional case for independence. The Scottish Independence Referendum: Constitutional and Political Implications. editor / Aileen McHarg ; Tom Mullen ; Alan Page ; Neil Walker. 2016.
@inbook{6eacac361b39486fbf50d291014834c9,
title = "The constitutional case for independence",
abstract = "The independence referendum arose out of an unanticipated set of political circumstances, rather than from a widely-felt and clearly-articulated sense of constitutional grievance. The referendum campaign was also conducted mainly in instrumental terms: dominated by arguments about the substantive policy consequences of independence, rather than overtly focused on Scotland’s governance arrangements. Nevertheless, this chapter argues that the instrumental case for independence was underpinned by a set of constitutional claims - about a democratic deficit; about effective governance; about the place of Scotland in the UK’s territorial constitution; and about the constitution of an independent Scotland –which in fact strongly echoed the constitutional case made for devolution a generation earlier. The chapter evaluates the strength of these arguments, arguing that there is a coherent, albeit not necessarily compelling, constitutional case to be made for independence – but one which seems likely to get stronger if post-referendum political and constitutional trends continue.",
keywords = "independence, referendum, Scotland, constitution, democratic deficit, governance, devolution",
author = "Aileen McHarg",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "23",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780198755524",
editor = "Aileen McHarg and Tom Mullen and Alan Page and Neil Walker",
booktitle = "The Scottish Independence Referendum",

}

McHarg, A 2016, The constitutional case for independence. in A McHarg, T Mullen, A Page & N Walker (eds), The Scottish Independence Referendum: Constitutional and Political Implications.

The constitutional case for independence. / McHarg, Aileen.

The Scottish Independence Referendum: Constitutional and Political Implications. ed. / Aileen McHarg; Tom Mullen; Alan Page; Neil Walker. 2016.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - The constitutional case for independence

AU - McHarg, Aileen

PY - 2016/6/23

Y1 - 2016/6/23

N2 - The independence referendum arose out of an unanticipated set of political circumstances, rather than from a widely-felt and clearly-articulated sense of constitutional grievance. The referendum campaign was also conducted mainly in instrumental terms: dominated by arguments about the substantive policy consequences of independence, rather than overtly focused on Scotland’s governance arrangements. Nevertheless, this chapter argues that the instrumental case for independence was underpinned by a set of constitutional claims - about a democratic deficit; about effective governance; about the place of Scotland in the UK’s territorial constitution; and about the constitution of an independent Scotland –which in fact strongly echoed the constitutional case made for devolution a generation earlier. The chapter evaluates the strength of these arguments, arguing that there is a coherent, albeit not necessarily compelling, constitutional case to be made for independence – but one which seems likely to get stronger if post-referendum political and constitutional trends continue.

AB - The independence referendum arose out of an unanticipated set of political circumstances, rather than from a widely-felt and clearly-articulated sense of constitutional grievance. The referendum campaign was also conducted mainly in instrumental terms: dominated by arguments about the substantive policy consequences of independence, rather than overtly focused on Scotland’s governance arrangements. Nevertheless, this chapter argues that the instrumental case for independence was underpinned by a set of constitutional claims - about a democratic deficit; about effective governance; about the place of Scotland in the UK’s territorial constitution; and about the constitution of an independent Scotland –which in fact strongly echoed the constitutional case made for devolution a generation earlier. The chapter evaluates the strength of these arguments, arguing that there is a coherent, albeit not necessarily compelling, constitutional case to be made for independence – but one which seems likely to get stronger if post-referendum political and constitutional trends continue.

KW - independence

KW - referendum

KW - Scotland

KW - constitution

KW - democratic deficit

KW - governance

KW - devolution

UR - https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-scottish-independence-referendum-9780198755524?q=Scottish%20Independence%20Referendum&lang=en&cc=gb#

UR - http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2707102

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780198755524

BT - The Scottish Independence Referendum

A2 - McHarg, Aileen

A2 - Mullen, Tom

A2 - Page, Alan

A2 - Walker, Neil

ER -

McHarg A. The constitutional case for independence. In McHarg A, Mullen T, Page A, Walker N, editors, The Scottish Independence Referendum: Constitutional and Political Implications. 2016