The complexities of technology-based care

telecare as perceived by care practitioners

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    92 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Telecare, which offers ‘care at a distance’ (Pols, 2012) through a variety of remote monitoring technologies, has developed rapidly across health and social care policy in many developed countries. Nonetheless, approaches to this development differ; the focus of this paper is the United Kingdom, where implementation has been particularly rapid and ambitious in scope. The paper argues that, while there are clear and tangible benefits from the use of some telecare technologies, there is insufficient research about the complexities of implementation with end users. These complexities include ethical questions raised by the use of monitoring and surveillance equipment, the ability to fine tune technologies to the needs of individuals, and the way in which care relationships may be altered by remote care mediated through technologies. This paper addresses these issues through a particularly under researched area; that is, the perceptions of care practitioners who assess for, and interact with, these technologies. The research was conducted with practitioners using qualitative research methodology. The paper concludes that Telecare practice is uneven in the way it addresses complexities and that more needs to be done to understand the way in which technologies are discussed and utilised by those charged with their implementation.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-20
    Number of pages20
    JournalIssues in Social Science
    Volume1
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 26 Oct 2013

    Fingerprint

    monitoring
    qualitative research
    surveillance
    methodology
    ability
    health

    Keywords

    • telecare
    • public policy
    • social care
    • health care
    • care technologies

    Cite this

    @article{1ef92574825b48038ff95af4880da555,
    title = "The complexities of technology-based care: telecare as perceived by care practitioners",
    abstract = "Telecare, which offers ‘care at a distance’ (Pols, 2012) through a variety of remote monitoring technologies, has developed rapidly across health and social care policy in many developed countries. Nonetheless, approaches to this development differ; the focus of this paper is the United Kingdom, where implementation has been particularly rapid and ambitious in scope. The paper argues that, while there are clear and tangible benefits from the use of some telecare technologies, there is insufficient research about the complexities of implementation with end users. These complexities include ethical questions raised by the use of monitoring and surveillance equipment, the ability to fine tune technologies to the needs of individuals, and the way in which care relationships may be altered by remote care mediated through technologies. This paper addresses these issues through a particularly under researched area; that is, the perceptions of care practitioners who assess for, and interact with, these technologies. The research was conducted with practitioners using qualitative research methodology. The paper concludes that Telecare practice is uneven in the way it addresses complexities and that more needs to be done to understand the way in which technologies are discussed and utilised by those charged with their implementation.",
    keywords = "telecare, public policy, social care, health care, care technologies",
    author = "Andrew Eccles",
    note = "Article accepted. Will be advance access October 2013.",
    year = "2013",
    month = "10",
    day = "26",
    doi = "10.5296/iss.v1i1.4464",
    language = "English",
    volume = "1",
    pages = "1--20",
    journal = "Issues in Social Science",
    issn = "2329-521X",
    number = "1",

    }

    The complexities of technology-based care : telecare as perceived by care practitioners. / Eccles, Andrew.

    In: Issues in Social Science, Vol. 1, No. 1, 26.10.2013, p. 1-20.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The complexities of technology-based care

    T2 - telecare as perceived by care practitioners

    AU - Eccles, Andrew

    N1 - Article accepted. Will be advance access October 2013.

    PY - 2013/10/26

    Y1 - 2013/10/26

    N2 - Telecare, which offers ‘care at a distance’ (Pols, 2012) through a variety of remote monitoring technologies, has developed rapidly across health and social care policy in many developed countries. Nonetheless, approaches to this development differ; the focus of this paper is the United Kingdom, where implementation has been particularly rapid and ambitious in scope. The paper argues that, while there are clear and tangible benefits from the use of some telecare technologies, there is insufficient research about the complexities of implementation with end users. These complexities include ethical questions raised by the use of monitoring and surveillance equipment, the ability to fine tune technologies to the needs of individuals, and the way in which care relationships may be altered by remote care mediated through technologies. This paper addresses these issues through a particularly under researched area; that is, the perceptions of care practitioners who assess for, and interact with, these technologies. The research was conducted with practitioners using qualitative research methodology. The paper concludes that Telecare practice is uneven in the way it addresses complexities and that more needs to be done to understand the way in which technologies are discussed and utilised by those charged with their implementation.

    AB - Telecare, which offers ‘care at a distance’ (Pols, 2012) through a variety of remote monitoring technologies, has developed rapidly across health and social care policy in many developed countries. Nonetheless, approaches to this development differ; the focus of this paper is the United Kingdom, where implementation has been particularly rapid and ambitious in scope. The paper argues that, while there are clear and tangible benefits from the use of some telecare technologies, there is insufficient research about the complexities of implementation with end users. These complexities include ethical questions raised by the use of monitoring and surveillance equipment, the ability to fine tune technologies to the needs of individuals, and the way in which care relationships may be altered by remote care mediated through technologies. This paper addresses these issues through a particularly under researched area; that is, the perceptions of care practitioners who assess for, and interact with, these technologies. The research was conducted with practitioners using qualitative research methodology. The paper concludes that Telecare practice is uneven in the way it addresses complexities and that more needs to be done to understand the way in which technologies are discussed and utilised by those charged with their implementation.

    KW - telecare

    KW - public policy

    KW - social care

    KW - health care

    KW - care technologies

    UR - http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/iss/index

    U2 - 10.5296/iss.v1i1.4464

    DO - 10.5296/iss.v1i1.4464

    M3 - Article

    VL - 1

    SP - 1

    EP - 20

    JO - Issues in Social Science

    JF - Issues in Social Science

    SN - 2329-521X

    IS - 1

    ER -