Abstract
The quality of the classroom environment, including ventilation, air quality and thermal conditions, has an important impact on children's health and academic achievements. The use of portable HEPA filter air cleaners is widely suggested as a strategy to mitigate exposure to particulate matter and airborne viruses. However, there is a need to quantify the relative benefits of such devices including the impacts on energy use. We present a simple coupled dynamic thermal and air quality model and apply it to naturally ventilated classrooms, representative of modern and Victorian era construction. We consider the addition of HEPA filters with, and without, reduced opening of windows, and explore concentrations of carbon dioxide (\co), \PM, airborne viral RNA, classroom temperature and energy use. Results indicate the addition of HEPA filters was predicted to reduce \PM~ by 40--60\% and viral RNA by 30--50\% depending on the classroom design and window opening behaviour. The energy cost of running HEPA filters is likely to be only 1\%--2\% of the classroom heating costs. In scenarios when HEPA filters were on and window opening was reduced (to account for the additional clean air delivery rate of the filters), the heating cost was predicted to be reduced by as much as -13\%, and these maximum reductions grew to -46\% in wintertime simulations. In these scenarios the HEPA filters result in a notable reduction in \PM~and viral RNA, but the \co\ concentration is significantly higher. The model provides a mechanism for exploring the relative impact of ventilation and air cleaning strategies on both exposures and energy costs, enabling an understanding of where trade-offs lie.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Place of Publication | Ithaca, NY |
Number of pages | 22 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 16 Apr 2024 |
Funding
they acknowledge funding from the SAMHE Project, as an extension of the CO-TRACE project, which was funded by the EPSRC under grant number EP/W001411/1, and received additional funding from the UK’s Department for Education. Further funding and support was received from the UKRI SPF Clean Air Networks, specifically: HCB, CJN and SGW received funding from the NERC Breathing City: Future Urban Ventilation Network, under grant number NE/V002082/1, and HCB received funding from the NERC Tackling Air Pollution at Schools Network, under grant number NE/V002341/1.
Keywords
- UK schools
- indoor air quality
- air cleaner
- natural ventilation
- energy use
- airborne exposure