The charge against electricity

Michael Anusas, Tim Ingold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Electricity has become such a ubiquitous feature of modern life that most of us would have no idea how to manage without it. Interruptions in supply are experienced as unsustainable moments of crisis. The possibility that the supply of electricity might eventually run dry is every government’s worst nightmare, and underpins the global politics of energy. Do we blame electricity for having brought us to this state of dependency? Can we hold it responsible for the disempowerment of citizens, for the entrapment of their lives within a state sponsored and corporately maintained grid? Or does it, on the contrary, hold the potential for emancipation? Is electricity guilty or not guilty? In what follows, we begin with the case for the prosecution. Then we present the case for the defence. You, our readers, are the jury, and we leave the verdict for you to decide.
LanguageEnglish
Pages540–554
Number of pages15
JournalCultural Anthropology
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2015

Fingerprint

charge
electricity
Electricity
supply
emancipation
prosecution
citizen
energy
politics

Keywords

  • anthropology
  • design
  • electricity
  • infrastructure
  • architecture

Cite this

Anusas, Michael ; Ingold, Tim. / The charge against electricity. In: Cultural Anthropology. 2015 ; Vol. 30, No. 4. pp. 540–554.
@article{05b2595cf7114363868f865df8b0ead2,
title = "The charge against electricity",
abstract = "Electricity has become such a ubiquitous feature of modern life that most of us would have no idea how to manage without it. Interruptions in supply are experienced as unsustainable moments of crisis. The possibility that the supply of electricity might eventually run dry is every government’s worst nightmare, and underpins the global politics of energy. Do we blame electricity for having brought us to this state of dependency? Can we hold it responsible for the disempowerment of citizens, for the entrapment of their lives within a state sponsored and corporately maintained grid? Or does it, on the contrary, hold the potential for emancipation? Is electricity guilty or not guilty? In what follows, we begin with the case for the prosecution. Then we present the case for the defence. You, our readers, are the jury, and we leave the verdict for you to decide.",
keywords = "anthropology, design, electricity, infrastructure, architecture",
author = "Michael Anusas and Tim Ingold",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
doi = "10.14506/ca30.4.03",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "540–554",
journal = "Journal of Cultural Anthropology",
issn = "0886-7356",
number = "4",

}

Anusas, M & Ingold, T 2015, 'The charge against electricity' Cultural Anthropology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 540–554. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca30.4.03

The charge against electricity. / Anusas, Michael; Ingold, Tim.

In: Cultural Anthropology, Vol. 30, No. 4, 11.2015, p. 540–554.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The charge against electricity

AU - Anusas, Michael

AU - Ingold, Tim

PY - 2015/11

Y1 - 2015/11

N2 - Electricity has become such a ubiquitous feature of modern life that most of us would have no idea how to manage without it. Interruptions in supply are experienced as unsustainable moments of crisis. The possibility that the supply of electricity might eventually run dry is every government’s worst nightmare, and underpins the global politics of energy. Do we blame electricity for having brought us to this state of dependency? Can we hold it responsible for the disempowerment of citizens, for the entrapment of their lives within a state sponsored and corporately maintained grid? Or does it, on the contrary, hold the potential for emancipation? Is electricity guilty or not guilty? In what follows, we begin with the case for the prosecution. Then we present the case for the defence. You, our readers, are the jury, and we leave the verdict for you to decide.

AB - Electricity has become such a ubiquitous feature of modern life that most of us would have no idea how to manage without it. Interruptions in supply are experienced as unsustainable moments of crisis. The possibility that the supply of electricity might eventually run dry is every government’s worst nightmare, and underpins the global politics of energy. Do we blame electricity for having brought us to this state of dependency? Can we hold it responsible for the disempowerment of citizens, for the entrapment of their lives within a state sponsored and corporately maintained grid? Or does it, on the contrary, hold the potential for emancipation? Is electricity guilty or not guilty? In what follows, we begin with the case for the prosecution. Then we present the case for the defence. You, our readers, are the jury, and we leave the verdict for you to decide.

KW - anthropology

KW - design

KW - electricity

KW - infrastructure

KW - architecture

UR - http://www.culanth.org/articles/789-the-charge-against-electricity

UR - http://culanth.org

U2 - 10.14506/ca30.4.03

DO - 10.14506/ca30.4.03

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 540

EP - 554

JO - Journal of Cultural Anthropology

T2 - Journal of Cultural Anthropology

JF - Journal of Cultural Anthropology

SN - 0886-7356

IS - 4

ER -