The boundaries of porn studies: on Linda Williams' porn studies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper centres around Porn Studies (ed. Linda Williams, 2004: Duke University Press). It examines the disciplinary terrain set out in this volume and the broader implications for the way in which we think about pornography in an academic context. Firstly, I explore the implications of the shift away from feminist debates about the nature, existence and regulation of pornography that this volume and others have called for. Secondly, I discuss the ‘porn' of porn studies: how do we define it, what is included and excluded by our definitions, and what are the implications of this definitional practice? Finally, I turn to the ‘study' of porn studies to consider the ethical and pedagogical consequences of canonising porn within the classroom and academic publishing.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-16
Number of pages16
JournalNew Review of Film and Television Studies
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Aug 2006

Fingerprint

pornography
regulation
classroom
Porn

Keywords

  • Linda Williams
  • pornography
  • feminism

Cite this

@article{cc5396d02d754d7eb7ec2ac6fcd603f4,
title = "The boundaries of porn studies: on Linda Williams' porn studies",
abstract = "This paper centres around Porn Studies (ed. Linda Williams, 2004: Duke University Press). It examines the disciplinary terrain set out in this volume and the broader implications for the way in which we think about pornography in an academic context. Firstly, I explore the implications of the shift away from feminist debates about the nature, existence and regulation of pornography that this volume and others have called for. Secondly, I discuss the ‘porn' of porn studies: how do we define it, what is included and excluded by our definitions, and what are the implications of this definitional practice? Finally, I turn to the ‘study' of porn studies to consider the ethical and pedagogical consequences of canonising porn within the classroom and academic publishing.",
keywords = "Linda Williams, pornography, feminism",
author = "Karen Boyle",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1080/17400300600577286",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "New Review of Film and Television Studies",
issn = "1740-0309",
number = "1",

}

The boundaries of porn studies : on Linda Williams' porn studies. / Boyle, Karen.

In: New Review of Film and Television Studies , Vol. 4, No. 1, 18.08.2006, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The boundaries of porn studies

T2 - New Review of Film and Television Studies

AU - Boyle, Karen

PY - 2006/8/18

Y1 - 2006/8/18

N2 - This paper centres around Porn Studies (ed. Linda Williams, 2004: Duke University Press). It examines the disciplinary terrain set out in this volume and the broader implications for the way in which we think about pornography in an academic context. Firstly, I explore the implications of the shift away from feminist debates about the nature, existence and regulation of pornography that this volume and others have called for. Secondly, I discuss the ‘porn' of porn studies: how do we define it, what is included and excluded by our definitions, and what are the implications of this definitional practice? Finally, I turn to the ‘study' of porn studies to consider the ethical and pedagogical consequences of canonising porn within the classroom and academic publishing.

AB - This paper centres around Porn Studies (ed. Linda Williams, 2004: Duke University Press). It examines the disciplinary terrain set out in this volume and the broader implications for the way in which we think about pornography in an academic context. Firstly, I explore the implications of the shift away from feminist debates about the nature, existence and regulation of pornography that this volume and others have called for. Secondly, I discuss the ‘porn' of porn studies: how do we define it, what is included and excluded by our definitions, and what are the implications of this definitional practice? Finally, I turn to the ‘study' of porn studies to consider the ethical and pedagogical consequences of canonising porn within the classroom and academic publishing.

KW - Linda Williams

KW - pornography

KW - feminism

UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17400300600577286

U2 - 10.1080/17400300600577286

DO - 10.1080/17400300600577286

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - New Review of Film and Television Studies

JF - New Review of Film and Television Studies

SN - 1740-0309

IS - 1

ER -