The assessment of metacognition in children aged 4-16 years: a systematic review

Louise Gascoine, Steve Higgins, Kate Wall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article presents the results of a syste matic review of methods that have been used to measure or assess metacognition in children aged 4-16 years over a 20-year period (1992-2012). It includes an overview of the types of tool and methods used linked with the ages of the participants targeted an d how metacognition and associated concepts are defined. 2721 records were identified through systematic searching; 525 articles or reports were full text screened, resulting in 149 included studies reporting 84 distinct tools or methods. Of these four we re excluded from further analysis after appraisal for reliability, validity and replicability. The final number of methods and tools for metacognitive assessment included in the analysis is 80. The key findings of this review include:
• Self-report measures (including questionnaires, surveys and tests) comprise 61% of the included tools.
• Observational methods that do not rely on prompting to ‘think aloud’ (Think Aloud Protocols) have only been used with students aged 9 years and under;
• Information about relia bility and validity is not always given or given accurately for different tools and methods;
• The definition of metacognition in a particular study relates directly to its assessment and therefore its outcomes: this can be misaligned.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-57
Number of pages54
JournalReview of Education
Volume5
Issue number1
Early online date30 May 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Feb 2017

Keywords

  • metacognition
  • systematic review
  • research methods
  • child development

Cite this