The arch index: a measure of flat or fat feet?

S.C. Wearing, A.P. Hills, N.M. Byrne, E.M. Hennig, M. McDonald

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    85 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Studies using footprint-based estimates of arch height have indicated that obesity results in a lowered medial longitudinal arch in children. However, the potentially confounding effect of body composition on indirect measures of arch height, such as the arch index, has not been investigated. This study assessed the body composition of 12 male and 12 female adults (mean age: 39.9 +/- 8.1 years, height: 1.724 +/- 0.101 m; weight: 95.1 +/- 13.7 kg, and BMI: 31.9 +/- 3.0 kg/m(2)) using bioelectrical impedance analysis to produce a two-component model of fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM). The dynamic arch index also was determined from electronic footprints captured during gait using a capacitive pressure distribution platform with a resolution of 4 sensors/cm(2). While significant correlations were noted between FFM and the area of both the hindfoot (r =.75, p <.05) and forefoot (r =.72, p <. 05), the midfoot area was correlated only with FM (r =.54, p <.05). Similarly, the arch index was significantly correlated with the FM percentage (r =.67, p <.05). The findings of this pilot study suggest that body composition influences arch index values in overweight and obese subjects. Consequently, body composition may be a confounding factor in interpreting footprint based estimates of arch height and, as such, these estimates would best be used with supplementary measures of body composition.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)575-581
    Number of pages6
    JournalFoot and Ankle International
    Volume25
    Issue number8
    Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Keywords

    • feet
    • bioengineering
    • body composition
    • tissue engineering

    Cite this