The absence of Ottoman, Islamic Europe in Edward W. Said's Orientalism

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Edward W. Said's Orientalism has attained canonical status as the key study of the cultural politics of 'Western' representation of the 'East', specifically the 'imaginative geographies' underwriting constructions such as the 'Middle East' and 'Islamic World'. The Ottoman Empire overlapped both European and exteriorised ‘Oriental’ space during much of the period that Said dealt with, yet while the existence of the empire is referred to in Said's study, the theoretical implications of that presence for his critique of Orientalist discourse is not. The material presence of the Ottoman state, in the Arabic speaking lands but also crucially, and for a longer period, much of south-east Europe and Anatolia, highlights longstanding 'Oriental' geopolitical and cultural agency in the face of unidirectional narratives of ‘Western’ encroachment. Attention to the specific discursive manoeuvres undertaken by the 'West' to handle that disruptive, intrinsic Ottoman presence in Europe itself, may add traction to the notion that the 'Orient' was imagined as a radically exterior point of comparison. It is argued that the history of Western representation of the Ottoman Empire constitutes a 'pre-Orientalist' discourse whose dual, perennial purpose is to make pragmatic accommodation for an Ottoman 'Oriental' material presence in Europe yet never to fully acknowledge its discursive presence as being of Europe. I argue that by supplementing Said's critique with a full consideration of the Ottoman legacy, a reformulation is possible that integrates the 'Islamic Orient' as an intrinsic component of historically informed notions of European 'space' while dissolving notions of the absolute distinction of that latter construct from the wider milieus in which it is embedded.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)99-121
    Number of pages23
    JournalTheory, Culture and Society
    Volume30
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2013

    Fingerprint

    orientalism
    Ottoman Empire
    discourse
    Middle East
    accommodation
    speaking
    pragmatics
    geography
    narrative
    politics
    Edward Said
    Orientalism
    Oriental
    history
    Discourse
    Orientalist
    Orient
    Discursive
    Intrinsic

    Keywords

    • orientalism
    • Said
    • Europeanism
    • historical narratives
    • history/critique
    • Islam
    • Ottoman Empire

    Cite this

    @article{49eadef929034245934397c8937c2260,
    title = "The absence of Ottoman, Islamic Europe in Edward W. Said's Orientalism",
    abstract = "Edward W. Said's Orientalism has attained canonical status as the key study of the cultural politics of 'Western' representation of the 'East', specifically the 'imaginative geographies' underwriting constructions such as the 'Middle East' and 'Islamic World'. The Ottoman Empire overlapped both European and exteriorised ‘Oriental’ space during much of the period that Said dealt with, yet while the existence of the empire is referred to in Said's study, the theoretical implications of that presence for his critique of Orientalist discourse is not. The material presence of the Ottoman state, in the Arabic speaking lands but also crucially, and for a longer period, much of south-east Europe and Anatolia, highlights longstanding 'Oriental' geopolitical and cultural agency in the face of unidirectional narratives of ‘Western’ encroachment. Attention to the specific discursive manoeuvres undertaken by the 'West' to handle that disruptive, intrinsic Ottoman presence in Europe itself, may add traction to the notion that the 'Orient' was imagined as a radically exterior point of comparison. It is argued that the history of Western representation of the Ottoman Empire constitutes a 'pre-Orientalist' discourse whose dual, perennial purpose is to make pragmatic accommodation for an Ottoman 'Oriental' material presence in Europe yet never to fully acknowledge its discursive presence as being of Europe. I argue that by supplementing Said's critique with a full consideration of the Ottoman legacy, a reformulation is possible that integrates the 'Islamic Orient' as an intrinsic component of historically informed notions of European 'space' while dissolving notions of the absolute distinction of that latter construct from the wider milieus in which it is embedded.",
    keywords = "orientalism, Said, Europeanism , historical narratives, history/critique, Islam, Ottoman Empire",
    author = "Derek Bryce",
    year = "2013",
    month = "1",
    doi = "10.1177/0263276412456562",
    language = "English",
    volume = "30",
    pages = "99--121",
    journal = "Theory, Culture and Society",
    issn = "0263-2764",
    number = "1",

    }

    The absence of Ottoman, Islamic Europe in Edward W. Said's Orientalism. / Bryce, Derek.

    In: Theory, Culture and Society , Vol. 30, No. 1, 01.2013, p. 99-121.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The absence of Ottoman, Islamic Europe in Edward W. Said's Orientalism

    AU - Bryce, Derek

    PY - 2013/1

    Y1 - 2013/1

    N2 - Edward W. Said's Orientalism has attained canonical status as the key study of the cultural politics of 'Western' representation of the 'East', specifically the 'imaginative geographies' underwriting constructions such as the 'Middle East' and 'Islamic World'. The Ottoman Empire overlapped both European and exteriorised ‘Oriental’ space during much of the period that Said dealt with, yet while the existence of the empire is referred to in Said's study, the theoretical implications of that presence for his critique of Orientalist discourse is not. The material presence of the Ottoman state, in the Arabic speaking lands but also crucially, and for a longer period, much of south-east Europe and Anatolia, highlights longstanding 'Oriental' geopolitical and cultural agency in the face of unidirectional narratives of ‘Western’ encroachment. Attention to the specific discursive manoeuvres undertaken by the 'West' to handle that disruptive, intrinsic Ottoman presence in Europe itself, may add traction to the notion that the 'Orient' was imagined as a radically exterior point of comparison. It is argued that the history of Western representation of the Ottoman Empire constitutes a 'pre-Orientalist' discourse whose dual, perennial purpose is to make pragmatic accommodation for an Ottoman 'Oriental' material presence in Europe yet never to fully acknowledge its discursive presence as being of Europe. I argue that by supplementing Said's critique with a full consideration of the Ottoman legacy, a reformulation is possible that integrates the 'Islamic Orient' as an intrinsic component of historically informed notions of European 'space' while dissolving notions of the absolute distinction of that latter construct from the wider milieus in which it is embedded.

    AB - Edward W. Said's Orientalism has attained canonical status as the key study of the cultural politics of 'Western' representation of the 'East', specifically the 'imaginative geographies' underwriting constructions such as the 'Middle East' and 'Islamic World'. The Ottoman Empire overlapped both European and exteriorised ‘Oriental’ space during much of the period that Said dealt with, yet while the existence of the empire is referred to in Said's study, the theoretical implications of that presence for his critique of Orientalist discourse is not. The material presence of the Ottoman state, in the Arabic speaking lands but also crucially, and for a longer period, much of south-east Europe and Anatolia, highlights longstanding 'Oriental' geopolitical and cultural agency in the face of unidirectional narratives of ‘Western’ encroachment. Attention to the specific discursive manoeuvres undertaken by the 'West' to handle that disruptive, intrinsic Ottoman presence in Europe itself, may add traction to the notion that the 'Orient' was imagined as a radically exterior point of comparison. It is argued that the history of Western representation of the Ottoman Empire constitutes a 'pre-Orientalist' discourse whose dual, perennial purpose is to make pragmatic accommodation for an Ottoman 'Oriental' material presence in Europe yet never to fully acknowledge its discursive presence as being of Europe. I argue that by supplementing Said's critique with a full consideration of the Ottoman legacy, a reformulation is possible that integrates the 'Islamic Orient' as an intrinsic component of historically informed notions of European 'space' while dissolving notions of the absolute distinction of that latter construct from the wider milieus in which it is embedded.

    KW - orientalism

    KW - Said

    KW - Europeanism

    KW - historical narratives

    KW - history/critique

    KW - Islam

    KW - Ottoman Empire

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873263461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/0263276412456562

    DO - 10.1177/0263276412456562

    M3 - Article

    VL - 30

    SP - 99

    EP - 121

    JO - Theory, Culture and Society

    JF - Theory, Culture and Society

    SN - 0263-2764

    IS - 1

    ER -