Technological memory aid use by people with acquired brain injury

Matthew Jamieson, Breda Cullen, Marilyn McGee-Lennon, Stephen Brewster, Jonathan Evans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evans, Wilson, Needham, and Brentnall (2003) investigated memory aid use by people with acquired brain injury (ABI) and found little use of technological memory aids. The present study aims to investigate use of technological and other memory aids and strategies 10 years on, and investigate what predicts use. People with ABI and self-reported memory impairments (n = 81) completed a survey containing a memory aid checklist, demographic questions and memory questionnaires. Chi-square analysis showed that 10 of 18 memory aids and strategies were used by significantly more people in the current sample than in Evans et al. (2003). The most commonly used strategies were leaving things in noticeable places (86%) and mental retracing of steps (77%). The most commonly used memory aids were asking someone to remind you (78%), diaries (77%), lists (78%), and calendars (79%) and the most common technologies used were mobile phone reminders (38%) and alarms/timers (38%). Younger people who used more technology prior to their injury and who use more non-technological memory aids currently were more likely to use technology. Younger people who used more memory aids and strategies prior to their injury and who rated their memory as poorer were more likely to use all types of memory aids and strategies.

LanguageEnglish
Pages919-936
Number of pages18
JournalNeuropsychological Rehabilitation
Volume27
Issue number6
Early online date28 Oct 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Oct 2015

Fingerprint

Brain Injuries
Technology
Brain Injury
Cell Phones
Wounds and Injuries
Checklist
Demography

Keywords

  • acquired brain injury
  • assistive technology
  • memory aids
  • memory rehabilitation

Cite this

Jamieson, Matthew ; Cullen, Breda ; McGee-Lennon, Marilyn ; Brewster, Stephen ; Evans, Jonathan. / Technological memory aid use by people with acquired brain injury. In: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 2015 ; Vol. 27, No. 6. pp. 919-936.
@article{011448588ade4f478c182c1457ac3eed,
title = "Technological memory aid use by people with acquired brain injury",
abstract = "Evans, Wilson, Needham, and Brentnall (2003) investigated memory aid use by people with acquired brain injury (ABI) and found little use of technological memory aids. The present study aims to investigate use of technological and other memory aids and strategies 10 years on, and investigate what predicts use. People with ABI and self-reported memory impairments (n = 81) completed a survey containing a memory aid checklist, demographic questions and memory questionnaires. Chi-square analysis showed that 10 of 18 memory aids and strategies were used by significantly more people in the current sample than in Evans et al. (2003). The most commonly used strategies were leaving things in noticeable places (86{\%}) and mental retracing of steps (77{\%}). The most commonly used memory aids were asking someone to remind you (78{\%}), diaries (77{\%}), lists (78{\%}), and calendars (79{\%}) and the most common technologies used were mobile phone reminders (38{\%}) and alarms/timers (38{\%}). Younger people who used more technology prior to their injury and who use more non-technological memory aids currently were more likely to use technology. Younger people who used more memory aids and strategies prior to their injury and who rated their memory as poorer were more likely to use all types of memory aids and strategies.",
keywords = "acquired brain injury, assistive technology, memory aids, memory rehabilitation",
author = "Matthew Jamieson and Breda Cullen and Marilyn McGee-Lennon and Stephen Brewster and Jonathan Evans",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Neuropsychological Rehabilitation on 28.10.2015, available online: http://wwww.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09602011.2015.1103760.",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1080/09602011.2015.1103760",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "919--936",
journal = "Neuropsychological Rehabilitation",
issn = "0960-2011",
number = "6",

}

Technological memory aid use by people with acquired brain injury. / Jamieson, Matthew; Cullen, Breda; McGee-Lennon, Marilyn; Brewster, Stephen; Evans, Jonathan.

In: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, Vol. 27, No. 6, 28.10.2015, p. 919-936.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Technological memory aid use by people with acquired brain injury

AU - Jamieson, Matthew

AU - Cullen, Breda

AU - McGee-Lennon, Marilyn

AU - Brewster, Stephen

AU - Evans, Jonathan

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Neuropsychological Rehabilitation on 28.10.2015, available online: http://wwww.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09602011.2015.1103760.

PY - 2015/10/28

Y1 - 2015/10/28

N2 - Evans, Wilson, Needham, and Brentnall (2003) investigated memory aid use by people with acquired brain injury (ABI) and found little use of technological memory aids. The present study aims to investigate use of technological and other memory aids and strategies 10 years on, and investigate what predicts use. People with ABI and self-reported memory impairments (n = 81) completed a survey containing a memory aid checklist, demographic questions and memory questionnaires. Chi-square analysis showed that 10 of 18 memory aids and strategies were used by significantly more people in the current sample than in Evans et al. (2003). The most commonly used strategies were leaving things in noticeable places (86%) and mental retracing of steps (77%). The most commonly used memory aids were asking someone to remind you (78%), diaries (77%), lists (78%), and calendars (79%) and the most common technologies used were mobile phone reminders (38%) and alarms/timers (38%). Younger people who used more technology prior to their injury and who use more non-technological memory aids currently were more likely to use technology. Younger people who used more memory aids and strategies prior to their injury and who rated their memory as poorer were more likely to use all types of memory aids and strategies.

AB - Evans, Wilson, Needham, and Brentnall (2003) investigated memory aid use by people with acquired brain injury (ABI) and found little use of technological memory aids. The present study aims to investigate use of technological and other memory aids and strategies 10 years on, and investigate what predicts use. People with ABI and self-reported memory impairments (n = 81) completed a survey containing a memory aid checklist, demographic questions and memory questionnaires. Chi-square analysis showed that 10 of 18 memory aids and strategies were used by significantly more people in the current sample than in Evans et al. (2003). The most commonly used strategies were leaving things in noticeable places (86%) and mental retracing of steps (77%). The most commonly used memory aids were asking someone to remind you (78%), diaries (77%), lists (78%), and calendars (79%) and the most common technologies used were mobile phone reminders (38%) and alarms/timers (38%). Younger people who used more technology prior to their injury and who use more non-technological memory aids currently were more likely to use technology. Younger people who used more memory aids and strategies prior to their injury and who rated their memory as poorer were more likely to use all types of memory aids and strategies.

KW - acquired brain injury

KW - assistive technology

KW - memory aids

KW - memory rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945360106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09602011.2015.1103760

DO - 10.1080/09602011.2015.1103760

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 919

EP - 936

JO - Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

T2 - Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

JF - Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

SN - 0960-2011

IS - 6

ER -