Tearing down the wall - The inclining experiment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It is a well-known fact that the current method for calculating a ship's vertical centre of gravity following inclining experiments is limited when considering magnitude of applied heel angle and accuracy achieved for certain hull-forms due to the assumption of unchanged metacentre position when the vessel is heeled. New methods for calculating the have been proposed, notably the Generalised and the Graphical methods. This paper aims to test these methods on a range of vessels, as well as present and contrast a new method named, the Polar method. The test will establish the error potential for each method using a purely technical software-simulated inclining experiment. Using the established error potential, a corrected is calculated from actual inclining values, which have been evaluated against the loading conditions for each vessel to see if the stability margins have been compromised. The study confirms the Classical method's dependency on applied heel angle magnitude, the change in waterplane area and that it compromises safety in some cases. The other methods, especially the Generalised and the Polar, produce very accurate results for any floating position of the vessel, highlighting the need to tear down the wall-sided assumption implicit in the Classical method and replace it with the better and more flexible methods.

LanguageEnglish
Pages442-475
Number of pages34
JournalOcean Engineering
Volume148
Early online date25 Nov 2017
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Gravitation
Ships
Experiments

Keywords

  • inclining experiment
  • lightweight VCG
  • calculation methods
  • error potential
  • ship stability
  • ship safety

Cite this

@article{96c4ed6c24f84a248a728958e29fabdd,
title = "Tearing down the wall - The inclining experiment",
abstract = "It is a well-known fact that the current method for calculating a ship's vertical centre of gravity following inclining experiments is limited when considering magnitude of applied heel angle and accuracy achieved for certain hull-forms due to the assumption of unchanged metacentre position when the vessel is heeled. New methods for calculating the have been proposed, notably the Generalised and the Graphical methods. This paper aims to test these methods on a range of vessels, as well as present and contrast a new method named, the Polar method. The test will establish the error potential for each method using a purely technical software-simulated inclining experiment. Using the established error potential, a corrected is calculated from actual inclining values, which have been evaluated against the loading conditions for each vessel to see if the stability margins have been compromised. The study confirms the Classical method's dependency on applied heel angle magnitude, the change in waterplane area and that it compromises safety in some cases. The other methods, especially the Generalised and the Polar, produce very accurate results for any floating position of the vessel, highlighting the need to tear down the wall-sided assumption implicit in the Classical method and replace it with the better and more flexible methods.",
keywords = "inclining experiment, lightweight VCG, calculation methods, error potential, ship stability, ship safety",
author = "{Bertheussen Karolius}, Kristian and Dracos Vassalos",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.11.037",
language = "English",
volume = "148",
pages = "442--475",
journal = "Ocean Engineering",
issn = "0029-8018",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Tearing down the wall - The inclining experiment. / Bertheussen Karolius, Kristian; Vassalos, Dracos.

In: Ocean Engineering, Vol. 148, 15.01.2018, p. 442-475.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tearing down the wall - The inclining experiment

AU - Bertheussen Karolius,Kristian

AU - Vassalos,Dracos

PY - 2018/1/15

Y1 - 2018/1/15

N2 - It is a well-known fact that the current method for calculating a ship's vertical centre of gravity following inclining experiments is limited when considering magnitude of applied heel angle and accuracy achieved for certain hull-forms due to the assumption of unchanged metacentre position when the vessel is heeled. New methods for calculating the have been proposed, notably the Generalised and the Graphical methods. This paper aims to test these methods on a range of vessels, as well as present and contrast a new method named, the Polar method. The test will establish the error potential for each method using a purely technical software-simulated inclining experiment. Using the established error potential, a corrected is calculated from actual inclining values, which have been evaluated against the loading conditions for each vessel to see if the stability margins have been compromised. The study confirms the Classical method's dependency on applied heel angle magnitude, the change in waterplane area and that it compromises safety in some cases. The other methods, especially the Generalised and the Polar, produce very accurate results for any floating position of the vessel, highlighting the need to tear down the wall-sided assumption implicit in the Classical method and replace it with the better and more flexible methods.

AB - It is a well-known fact that the current method for calculating a ship's vertical centre of gravity following inclining experiments is limited when considering magnitude of applied heel angle and accuracy achieved for certain hull-forms due to the assumption of unchanged metacentre position when the vessel is heeled. New methods for calculating the have been proposed, notably the Generalised and the Graphical methods. This paper aims to test these methods on a range of vessels, as well as present and contrast a new method named, the Polar method. The test will establish the error potential for each method using a purely technical software-simulated inclining experiment. Using the established error potential, a corrected is calculated from actual inclining values, which have been evaluated against the loading conditions for each vessel to see if the stability margins have been compromised. The study confirms the Classical method's dependency on applied heel angle magnitude, the change in waterplane area and that it compromises safety in some cases. The other methods, especially the Generalised and the Polar, produce very accurate results for any floating position of the vessel, highlighting the need to tear down the wall-sided assumption implicit in the Classical method and replace it with the better and more flexible methods.

KW - inclining experiment

KW - lightweight VCG

KW - calculation methods

KW - error potential

KW - ship stability

KW - ship safety

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029801817307060

U2 - 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.11.037

DO - 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.11.037

M3 - Article

VL - 148

SP - 442

EP - 475

JO - Ocean Engineering

T2 - Ocean Engineering

JF - Ocean Engineering

SN - 0029-8018

ER -