Teacher voice and ownership of curriculum change

D. Kirk, D. Macdonald

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

135 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We comment critically on the notion that teachers can experience ownership of curriculum change. The evidence base for this commentary is our work on two curriculum development projects in health and physical education between 1993 and 1998. Applying a theoretical framework adapted from Bernstein's writing on the social construction of pedagogic discourse, we contend that the possibilities for teacher ownership of curriculum change are circumscribed by the anchoring of their authority to speak on curriculum matters in the local context of implementation. We argue that this anchoring of teacher voice provides a key to understanding the perennial problem of the transformation of innovative ideas from conception to implementation. We also provide some insights into the extent to which genuine participation by teachers in education reform might be possible, and we conclude with a discussion of the possibilities that exist for partnerships in reforming health and physical education.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)551-567
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Curriculum Studies
Volume33
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Fingerprint

curriculum
teacher
physical education
health promotion
curriculum development
pedagogics
social construction
development project
reform
participation
discourse
evidence
education
experience

Cite this

Kirk, D. ; Macdonald, D. / Teacher voice and ownership of curriculum change. In: Journal of Curriculum Studies . 2001 ; Vol. 33, No. 5. pp. 551-567.
@article{79f354d118904833b0a7880bab80966f,
title = "Teacher voice and ownership of curriculum change",
abstract = "We comment critically on the notion that teachers can experience ownership of curriculum change. The evidence base for this commentary is our work on two curriculum development projects in health and physical education between 1993 and 1998. Applying a theoretical framework adapted from Bernstein's writing on the social construction of pedagogic discourse, we contend that the possibilities for teacher ownership of curriculum change are circumscribed by the anchoring of their authority to speak on curriculum matters in the local context of implementation. We argue that this anchoring of teacher voice provides a key to understanding the perennial problem of the transformation of innovative ideas from conception to implementation. We also provide some insights into the extent to which genuine participation by teachers in education reform might be possible, and we conclude with a discussion of the possibilities that exist for partnerships in reforming health and physical education.",
author = "D. Kirk and D. Macdonald",
note = "cited By (since 1996)56",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1080/00220270010016874",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "551--567",
journal = "Journal of Curriculum Studies",
issn = "0022-0272",
number = "5",

}

Teacher voice and ownership of curriculum change. / Kirk, D.; Macdonald, D.

In: Journal of Curriculum Studies , Vol. 33, No. 5, 2001, p. 551-567.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Teacher voice and ownership of curriculum change

AU - Kirk, D.

AU - Macdonald, D.

N1 - cited By (since 1996)56

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - We comment critically on the notion that teachers can experience ownership of curriculum change. The evidence base for this commentary is our work on two curriculum development projects in health and physical education between 1993 and 1998. Applying a theoretical framework adapted from Bernstein's writing on the social construction of pedagogic discourse, we contend that the possibilities for teacher ownership of curriculum change are circumscribed by the anchoring of their authority to speak on curriculum matters in the local context of implementation. We argue that this anchoring of teacher voice provides a key to understanding the perennial problem of the transformation of innovative ideas from conception to implementation. We also provide some insights into the extent to which genuine participation by teachers in education reform might be possible, and we conclude with a discussion of the possibilities that exist for partnerships in reforming health and physical education.

AB - We comment critically on the notion that teachers can experience ownership of curriculum change. The evidence base for this commentary is our work on two curriculum development projects in health and physical education between 1993 and 1998. Applying a theoretical framework adapted from Bernstein's writing on the social construction of pedagogic discourse, we contend that the possibilities for teacher ownership of curriculum change are circumscribed by the anchoring of their authority to speak on curriculum matters in the local context of implementation. We argue that this anchoring of teacher voice provides a key to understanding the perennial problem of the transformation of innovative ideas from conception to implementation. We also provide some insights into the extent to which genuine participation by teachers in education reform might be possible, and we conclude with a discussion of the possibilities that exist for partnerships in reforming health and physical education.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-1842618361&partnerID=40&md5=027b14f2983a4884350b018058e4959e

U2 - 10.1080/00220270010016874

DO - 10.1080/00220270010016874

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 551

EP - 567

JO - Journal of Curriculum Studies

JF - Journal of Curriculum Studies

SN - 0022-0272

IS - 5

ER -