Tax planning and strategic decisions: a comparison of UK firms and Turkish firms

Mehmet Demirbag, Jane Frecknall-Hughes, Keith Glaister, Ekrem Tatoglu

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

    Abstract

    This paper investigates a number of research questions related to tax planning, an area where there has been little prior empirical research, by examining the perceptions of two groups of tax practitioners, one group employed in UK firms and another group employed in Turkish firms. This facilitates both an examination of responses from within each country and a cross-national comparison of tax planning issues. There are several statistically significant differences between the perception s of UK practitioners and Turkish practitioners. We find that the tax planning variables ‘relative importance of tax factors in decision making’, ‘strategic decisions are taken after tax decisions and tax decisions take priority over strategic decisions’ and the ‘extent of formal strategic planning’ are relatively more important for Turkish firms than for UK firms. In contrast the variables the ‘nature of tax planning’, ‘tax planning costs compared to savings’, ‘relative importance of non-tax factors in decision-making’, ‘strategic decisions and tax decisions are integrated and taken at the same time’ and the ‘disconnect between strategic decisions and tax decisions’ are all relatively more important for UK firms than for Turkish firms. The paper makes a new contribution to the literature by providing evidence from a cross-national study on the nature of tax planning and the way in which strategic decisions interface with tax decisions.

    Conference

    ConferenceAcademy of International Business Annual Meeting
    CountryCanada
    CityVancouver
    Period23/06/1426/06/14

    Fingerprint

    Strategic decisions
    Tax planning
    Tax
    Strategic decision making
    Factors
    Relative importance
    Cross-national study
    Savings
    Empirical research
    Strategic planning
    Costs
    Integrated
    Cross-national comparison

    Keywords

    • tax planning
    • strategic decisions
    • comparison
    • uk firms
    • turkish firms

    Cite this

    Demirbag, M., Frecknall-Hughes, J., Glaister, K., & Tatoglu, E. (2014). Tax planning and strategic decisions: a comparison of UK firms and Turkish firms. Paper presented at Academy of International Business Annual Meeting, Vancouver, Canada.
    Demirbag, Mehmet ; Frecknall-Hughes, Jane ; Glaister, Keith ; Tatoglu, Ekrem. / Tax planning and strategic decisions : a comparison of UK firms and Turkish firms. Paper presented at Academy of International Business Annual Meeting, Vancouver, Canada.
    @conference{90bad483fcee45e0bf8b672f991a8bcb,
    title = "Tax planning and strategic decisions: a comparison of UK firms and Turkish firms",
    abstract = "This paper investigates a number of research questions related to tax planning, an area where there has been little prior empirical research, by examining the perceptions of two groups of tax practitioners, one group employed in UK firms and another group employed in Turkish firms. This facilitates both an examination of responses from within each country and a cross-national comparison of tax planning issues. There are several statistically significant differences between the perception s of UK practitioners and Turkish practitioners. We find that the tax planning variables ‘relative importance of tax factors in decision making’, ‘strategic decisions are taken after tax decisions and tax decisions take priority over strategic decisions’ and the ‘extent of formal strategic planning’ are relatively more important for Turkish firms than for UK firms. In contrast the variables the ‘nature of tax planning’, ‘tax planning costs compared to savings’, ‘relative importance of non-tax factors in decision-making’, ‘strategic decisions and tax decisions are integrated and taken at the same time’ and the ‘disconnect between strategic decisions and tax decisions’ are all relatively more important for UK firms than for Turkish firms. The paper makes a new contribution to the literature by providing evidence from a cross-national study on the nature of tax planning and the way in which strategic decisions interface with tax decisions.",
    keywords = "tax planning, strategic decisions, comparison, uk firms, turkish firms",
    author = "Mehmet Demirbag and Jane Frecknall-Hughes and Keith Glaister and Ekrem Tatoglu",
    year = "2014",
    month = "6",
    language = "English",
    note = "Academy of International Business Annual Meeting ; Conference date: 23-06-2014 Through 26-06-2014",

    }

    Demirbag, M, Frecknall-Hughes, J, Glaister, K & Tatoglu, E 2014, 'Tax planning and strategic decisions: a comparison of UK firms and Turkish firms' Paper presented at Academy of International Business Annual Meeting, Vancouver, Canada, 23/06/14 - 26/06/14, .

    Tax planning and strategic decisions : a comparison of UK firms and Turkish firms. / Demirbag, Mehmet; Frecknall-Hughes, Jane; Glaister, Keith; Tatoglu, Ekrem.

    2014. Paper presented at Academy of International Business Annual Meeting, Vancouver, Canada.

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

    TY - CONF

    T1 - Tax planning and strategic decisions

    T2 - a comparison of UK firms and Turkish firms

    AU - Demirbag, Mehmet

    AU - Frecknall-Hughes, Jane

    AU - Glaister, Keith

    AU - Tatoglu, Ekrem

    PY - 2014/6

    Y1 - 2014/6

    N2 - This paper investigates a number of research questions related to tax planning, an area where there has been little prior empirical research, by examining the perceptions of two groups of tax practitioners, one group employed in UK firms and another group employed in Turkish firms. This facilitates both an examination of responses from within each country and a cross-national comparison of tax planning issues. There are several statistically significant differences between the perception s of UK practitioners and Turkish practitioners. We find that the tax planning variables ‘relative importance of tax factors in decision making’, ‘strategic decisions are taken after tax decisions and tax decisions take priority over strategic decisions’ and the ‘extent of formal strategic planning’ are relatively more important for Turkish firms than for UK firms. In contrast the variables the ‘nature of tax planning’, ‘tax planning costs compared to savings’, ‘relative importance of non-tax factors in decision-making’, ‘strategic decisions and tax decisions are integrated and taken at the same time’ and the ‘disconnect between strategic decisions and tax decisions’ are all relatively more important for UK firms than for Turkish firms. The paper makes a new contribution to the literature by providing evidence from a cross-national study on the nature of tax planning and the way in which strategic decisions interface with tax decisions.

    AB - This paper investigates a number of research questions related to tax planning, an area where there has been little prior empirical research, by examining the perceptions of two groups of tax practitioners, one group employed in UK firms and another group employed in Turkish firms. This facilitates both an examination of responses from within each country and a cross-national comparison of tax planning issues. There are several statistically significant differences between the perception s of UK practitioners and Turkish practitioners. We find that the tax planning variables ‘relative importance of tax factors in decision making’, ‘strategic decisions are taken after tax decisions and tax decisions take priority over strategic decisions’ and the ‘extent of formal strategic planning’ are relatively more important for Turkish firms than for UK firms. In contrast the variables the ‘nature of tax planning’, ‘tax planning costs compared to savings’, ‘relative importance of non-tax factors in decision-making’, ‘strategic decisions and tax decisions are integrated and taken at the same time’ and the ‘disconnect between strategic decisions and tax decisions’ are all relatively more important for UK firms than for Turkish firms. The paper makes a new contribution to the literature by providing evidence from a cross-national study on the nature of tax planning and the way in which strategic decisions interface with tax decisions.

    KW - tax planning

    KW - strategic decisions

    KW - comparison

    KW - uk firms

    KW - turkish firms

    UR - http://aib.msu.edu/events/2014/

    UR - http://aib.msu.edu/events/2014/pdfs/AIB2014_Program.pdf

    M3 - Paper

    ER -

    Demirbag M, Frecknall-Hughes J, Glaister K, Tatoglu E. Tax planning and strategic decisions: a comparison of UK firms and Turkish firms. 2014. Paper presented at Academy of International Business Annual Meeting, Vancouver, Canada.