Taste matters: cultural capital and elites in proximate strategic action fields

Crawford Spence, Chris Carter, Javier Husillos, Pablo Archel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent literature suggests that elites are increasingly fragmented and divided. Yet there is very little empirical research that maps the distinctions between different elite groups. This article explores the cultural divisions that pertain to elite factions in two distinct, but proximate Strategic Action Fields. A key insight from the paper is that the public sector faction studied exhibits a much broader, more aesthetic set of cultural dispositions than their private sector counterparts. This permits a number of inter-related contributions to be made to literature on both elites and field theory. Firstly, the findings demonstrate that cultural capital acts as a salient source of distinction between elite factions in different Strategic Action Fields. Secondly, it is shown how cultural capital is socially functional as certain cultural dispositions are strongly homologous with specific professional roles. Thirdly, the paper demonstrates the implications for the structure of the state when two culturally distinct elites are brought together in a new Strategic Action Field.
LanguageEnglish
Pages211-236
JournalHuman Relations
Volume70
Issue number2
Early online date28 Jun 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2017

Fingerprint

cultural capital
elite
faction
disposition
field theory
Cultural capital
Strategic action
Elites
Cultural Capital
empirical research
private sector
public sector
aesthetics
Factions
Group

Keywords

  • elites
  • cultural capital
  • taste
  • public sector
  • private sector
  • strategic action fields

Cite this

Spence, Crawford ; Carter, Chris ; Husillos, Javier ; Archel, Pablo. / Taste matters : cultural capital and elites in proximate strategic action fields . In: Human Relations. 2017 ; Vol. 70, No. 2. pp. 211-236.
@article{3fcf85154c9840349e113c0e176b580a,
title = "Taste matters: cultural capital and elites in proximate strategic action fields",
abstract = "Recent literature suggests that elites are increasingly fragmented and divided. Yet there is very little empirical research that maps the distinctions between different elite groups. This article explores the cultural divisions that pertain to elite factions in two distinct, but proximate Strategic Action Fields. A key insight from the paper is that the public sector faction studied exhibits a much broader, more aesthetic set of cultural dispositions than their private sector counterparts. This permits a number of inter-related contributions to be made to literature on both elites and field theory. Firstly, the findings demonstrate that cultural capital acts as a salient source of distinction between elite factions in different Strategic Action Fields. Secondly, it is shown how cultural capital is socially functional as certain cultural dispositions are strongly homologous with specific professional roles. Thirdly, the paper demonstrates the implications for the structure of the state when two culturally distinct elites are brought together in a new Strategic Action Field.",
keywords = "elites, cultural capital, taste, public sector, private sector, strategic action fields",
author = "Crawford Spence and Chris Carter and Javier Husillos and Pablo Archel",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0018726716649247",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "211--236",
journal = "Human Relations",
issn = "0018-7267",
number = "2",

}

Taste matters : cultural capital and elites in proximate strategic action fields . / Spence, Crawford; Carter, Chris; Husillos, Javier; Archel, Pablo.

In: Human Relations, Vol. 70, No. 2, 01.02.2017, p. 211-236.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Taste matters

T2 - Human Relations

AU - Spence, Crawford

AU - Carter, Chris

AU - Husillos, Javier

AU - Archel, Pablo

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Recent literature suggests that elites are increasingly fragmented and divided. Yet there is very little empirical research that maps the distinctions between different elite groups. This article explores the cultural divisions that pertain to elite factions in two distinct, but proximate Strategic Action Fields. A key insight from the paper is that the public sector faction studied exhibits a much broader, more aesthetic set of cultural dispositions than their private sector counterparts. This permits a number of inter-related contributions to be made to literature on both elites and field theory. Firstly, the findings demonstrate that cultural capital acts as a salient source of distinction between elite factions in different Strategic Action Fields. Secondly, it is shown how cultural capital is socially functional as certain cultural dispositions are strongly homologous with specific professional roles. Thirdly, the paper demonstrates the implications for the structure of the state when two culturally distinct elites are brought together in a new Strategic Action Field.

AB - Recent literature suggests that elites are increasingly fragmented and divided. Yet there is very little empirical research that maps the distinctions between different elite groups. This article explores the cultural divisions that pertain to elite factions in two distinct, but proximate Strategic Action Fields. A key insight from the paper is that the public sector faction studied exhibits a much broader, more aesthetic set of cultural dispositions than their private sector counterparts. This permits a number of inter-related contributions to be made to literature on both elites and field theory. Firstly, the findings demonstrate that cultural capital acts as a salient source of distinction between elite factions in different Strategic Action Fields. Secondly, it is shown how cultural capital is socially functional as certain cultural dispositions are strongly homologous with specific professional roles. Thirdly, the paper demonstrates the implications for the structure of the state when two culturally distinct elites are brought together in a new Strategic Action Field.

KW - elites

KW - cultural capital

KW - taste

KW - public sector

KW - private sector

KW - strategic action fields

UR - http://hum.sagepub.com/content/by/year

U2 - 10.1177/0018726716649247

DO - 10.1177/0018726716649247

M3 - Article

VL - 70

SP - 211

EP - 236

JO - Human Relations

JF - Human Relations

SN - 0018-7267

IS - 2

ER -