Talking back to 'family', 'family troubles', and 'the looked-after child'

Vicki Welch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

'Looked after' is a term used in the UK to describe children who are the subject of 'alternative care' arrangements (i.e. in the care of a statutory authority), most often away from their birth parents. Within this potentially stigmatising context, this paper presents a reanalysis of data from semi-structured interviews with seventeen participants during three recent small-scale studies in Scotland. Juhila's (2004) concept of 'talking back' to potentially stigmatising categories informs this analysis that explores participants' understanding of, and responses to, three categorisations: the 'family', 'family troubles', and 'the looked-after child'. Participants were either: young people with experience of home supervision, birth mothers of adopted children, or kinship carers.
The analysis finds clear examples of 'talking back' to all three categories, including through a process that linked categories, such that accepting aspects of one potentially stigmatised identity, helped to explain membership of another. This suggests a potential refinement of Juhila's model.
'Looked after' was widely understood, but the term was seldom used by participants. There was evidence that participants 'talked back' to the idea of the looked after child by problematising its appropriateness in their circumstances, including home supervision and kinship care. In their discussions with researchers, these participants privileged biological understandings of 'family', affirming enduring links despite troubles and separations. The paper is concluded by identifying briefly some implications for policy and practice.
LanguageEnglish
Pages197–218
Number of pages26
JournalSociological Research Online
Volume23
Issue number1
Early online date4 Jan 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

kinship
supervision
adopted child
parents
interview
evidence
experience

Keywords

  • children in care
  • looked-after children
  • young people
  • kinship carers
  • birth mothers
  • family
  • family troubles

Cite this

@article{e77a90463ea64f968be84c3b77725a67,
title = "Talking back to 'family', 'family troubles', and 'the looked-after child'",
abstract = "'Looked after' is a term used in the UK to describe children who are the subject of 'alternative care' arrangements (i.e. in the care of a statutory authority), most often away from their birth parents. Within this potentially stigmatising context, this paper presents a reanalysis of data from semi-structured interviews with seventeen participants during three recent small-scale studies in Scotland. Juhila's (2004) concept of 'talking back' to potentially stigmatising categories informs this analysis that explores participants' understanding of, and responses to, three categorisations: the 'family', 'family troubles', and 'the looked-after child'. Participants were either: young people with experience of home supervision, birth mothers of adopted children, or kinship carers.The analysis finds clear examples of 'talking back' to all three categories, including through a process that linked categories, such that accepting aspects of one potentially stigmatised identity, helped to explain membership of another. This suggests a potential refinement of Juhila's model.'Looked after' was widely understood, but the term was seldom used by participants. There was evidence that participants 'talked back' to the idea of the looked after child by problematising its appropriateness in their circumstances, including home supervision and kinship care. In their discussions with researchers, these participants privileged biological understandings of 'family', affirming enduring links despite troubles and separations. The paper is concluded by identifying briefly some implications for policy and practice.",
keywords = "children in care, looked-after children, young people, kinship carers, birth mothers, family, family troubles",
author = "Vicki Welch",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1360780417749439",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "197–218",
journal = "Sociological Research Online",
issn = "1360-7804",
number = "1",

}

Talking back to 'family', 'family troubles', and 'the looked-after child'. / Welch, Vicki.

In: Sociological Research Online, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.03.2018, p. 197–218.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Talking back to 'family', 'family troubles', and 'the looked-after child'

AU - Welch, Vicki

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - 'Looked after' is a term used in the UK to describe children who are the subject of 'alternative care' arrangements (i.e. in the care of a statutory authority), most often away from their birth parents. Within this potentially stigmatising context, this paper presents a reanalysis of data from semi-structured interviews with seventeen participants during three recent small-scale studies in Scotland. Juhila's (2004) concept of 'talking back' to potentially stigmatising categories informs this analysis that explores participants' understanding of, and responses to, three categorisations: the 'family', 'family troubles', and 'the looked-after child'. Participants were either: young people with experience of home supervision, birth mothers of adopted children, or kinship carers.The analysis finds clear examples of 'talking back' to all three categories, including through a process that linked categories, such that accepting aspects of one potentially stigmatised identity, helped to explain membership of another. This suggests a potential refinement of Juhila's model.'Looked after' was widely understood, but the term was seldom used by participants. There was evidence that participants 'talked back' to the idea of the looked after child by problematising its appropriateness in their circumstances, including home supervision and kinship care. In their discussions with researchers, these participants privileged biological understandings of 'family', affirming enduring links despite troubles and separations. The paper is concluded by identifying briefly some implications for policy and practice.

AB - 'Looked after' is a term used in the UK to describe children who are the subject of 'alternative care' arrangements (i.e. in the care of a statutory authority), most often away from their birth parents. Within this potentially stigmatising context, this paper presents a reanalysis of data from semi-structured interviews with seventeen participants during three recent small-scale studies in Scotland. Juhila's (2004) concept of 'talking back' to potentially stigmatising categories informs this analysis that explores participants' understanding of, and responses to, three categorisations: the 'family', 'family troubles', and 'the looked-after child'. Participants were either: young people with experience of home supervision, birth mothers of adopted children, or kinship carers.The analysis finds clear examples of 'talking back' to all three categories, including through a process that linked categories, such that accepting aspects of one potentially stigmatised identity, helped to explain membership of another. This suggests a potential refinement of Juhila's model.'Looked after' was widely understood, but the term was seldom used by participants. There was evidence that participants 'talked back' to the idea of the looked after child by problematising its appropriateness in their circumstances, including home supervision and kinship care. In their discussions with researchers, these participants privileged biological understandings of 'family', affirming enduring links despite troubles and separations. The paper is concluded by identifying briefly some implications for policy and practice.

KW - children in care

KW - looked-after children

KW - young people

KW - kinship carers

KW - birth mothers

KW - family

KW - family troubles

UR - https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/journal/sociological-research-online

U2 - 10.1177/1360780417749439

DO - 10.1177/1360780417749439

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 197

EP - 218

JO - Sociological Research Online

T2 - Sociological Research Online

JF - Sociological Research Online

SN - 1360-7804

IS - 1

ER -