Taking service providers to court: people with learning disabilities and Part III of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995

J.A. Lerpiniere, Kirsten Stalker

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Despite evidence of poor service provision for people with learning disabilities in the UK (e.g. DRC, Code of practice. Rights of access: services to the public, public authority functions, private clubs and premises. London: The Stationery Office, 2006; Sloan, J Inform Law Tech [electronic journal], 2001), very little use has been made of Part III (Goods, Facilities and Services) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 by people with learning disabilities (personal communication, Disability Rights Commission Conciliation Management Unit). Difficulties faced by individuals who might consider pursuing a claim against a service provider are well-documented and include stress, time and financial constraints (Crit Soc Policy, 20: 533-549, 2000). Once a complaint has been made or a claim lodged other legislative barriers can make it difficult to pursue a case (Industr Law J, 32: 164-184, 2003). The aim of this article is to investigate the effectiveness of legislative use of Part III of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 in promoting equality for people with learning disabilities. Effectiveness will be gauged through analysis of the legal process engaged in by two people with learning disabilities who made claims against service providers under Part III of this Act.
    LanguageEnglish
    JournalBritish Journal of Learning Disabilities
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Fingerprint

    Learning Disorders
    Disabled Persons
    Communication Disorders
    Communication

    Keywords

    • disability discrimination act 1995
    • facilities
    • services
    • learning disabilities
    • service providers

    Cite this

    @article{fff4a7442c824a6e899d002831dcbc4d,
    title = "Taking service providers to court: people with learning disabilities and Part III of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995",
    abstract = "Despite evidence of poor service provision for people with learning disabilities in the UK (e.g. DRC, Code of practice. Rights of access: services to the public, public authority functions, private clubs and premises. London: The Stationery Office, 2006; Sloan, J Inform Law Tech [electronic journal], 2001), very little use has been made of Part III (Goods, Facilities and Services) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 by people with learning disabilities (personal communication, Disability Rights Commission Conciliation Management Unit). Difficulties faced by individuals who might consider pursuing a claim against a service provider are well-documented and include stress, time and financial constraints (Crit Soc Policy, 20: 533-549, 2000). Once a complaint has been made or a claim lodged other legislative barriers can make it difficult to pursue a case (Industr Law J, 32: 164-184, 2003). The aim of this article is to investigate the effectiveness of legislative use of Part III of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 in promoting equality for people with learning disabilities. Effectiveness will be gauged through analysis of the legal process engaged in by two people with learning disabilities who made claims against service providers under Part III of this Act.",
    keywords = "disability discrimination act 1995, facilities, services, learning disabilities, service providers",
    author = "J.A. Lerpiniere and Kirsten Stalker",
    year = "2009",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1468-3156.2009.00595.x",
    language = "English",
    journal = "British Journal of Learning Disability",
    issn = "1354-4187",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Taking service providers to court: people with learning disabilities and Part III of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995

    AU - Lerpiniere, J.A.

    AU - Stalker, Kirsten

    PY - 2009

    Y1 - 2009

    N2 - Despite evidence of poor service provision for people with learning disabilities in the UK (e.g. DRC, Code of practice. Rights of access: services to the public, public authority functions, private clubs and premises. London: The Stationery Office, 2006; Sloan, J Inform Law Tech [electronic journal], 2001), very little use has been made of Part III (Goods, Facilities and Services) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 by people with learning disabilities (personal communication, Disability Rights Commission Conciliation Management Unit). Difficulties faced by individuals who might consider pursuing a claim against a service provider are well-documented and include stress, time and financial constraints (Crit Soc Policy, 20: 533-549, 2000). Once a complaint has been made or a claim lodged other legislative barriers can make it difficult to pursue a case (Industr Law J, 32: 164-184, 2003). The aim of this article is to investigate the effectiveness of legislative use of Part III of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 in promoting equality for people with learning disabilities. Effectiveness will be gauged through analysis of the legal process engaged in by two people with learning disabilities who made claims against service providers under Part III of this Act.

    AB - Despite evidence of poor service provision for people with learning disabilities in the UK (e.g. DRC, Code of practice. Rights of access: services to the public, public authority functions, private clubs and premises. London: The Stationery Office, 2006; Sloan, J Inform Law Tech [electronic journal], 2001), very little use has been made of Part III (Goods, Facilities and Services) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 by people with learning disabilities (personal communication, Disability Rights Commission Conciliation Management Unit). Difficulties faced by individuals who might consider pursuing a claim against a service provider are well-documented and include stress, time and financial constraints (Crit Soc Policy, 20: 533-549, 2000). Once a complaint has been made or a claim lodged other legislative barriers can make it difficult to pursue a case (Industr Law J, 32: 164-184, 2003). The aim of this article is to investigate the effectiveness of legislative use of Part III of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 in promoting equality for people with learning disabilities. Effectiveness will be gauged through analysis of the legal process engaged in by two people with learning disabilities who made claims against service providers under Part III of this Act.

    KW - disability discrimination act 1995

    KW - facilities

    KW - services

    KW - learning disabilities

    KW - service providers

    UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.2009.00595.x

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-3156.2009.00595.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1468-3156.2009.00595.x

    M3 - Article

    JO - British Journal of Learning Disability

    T2 - British Journal of Learning Disability

    JF - British Journal of Learning Disability

    SN - 1354-4187

    ER -