Taking health geography out of the academy

Niamh K. Shortt, Jamie Pearce, Richard Mitchell, Katherine E. Smith

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In recent years the academic landscape has been shifting and significantly affected by the introduction of an ‘impact agenda’. Academics are increasingly expected to demonstrate their broader engagement with the world and evidence related outcomes. Whilst different countries are at various stages along this impact journey, the UK is the first country to link impact to funding outcomes; here impact now accounts for 20% of an academic unit of assessment’s Research Excellence Framework (REF) result. This concept of ‘research impact’ implies that our work can effect change through one or more identifiable events in a direct, preferably linear and certainly measurable manner. In this paper, focusing on impact in social science, and policy-related impact in particular, we argue that such a cause and effect model is inappropriate. Furthermore that impact is not immediate or indeed linear within social science research. Drawing on recent work on alcohol and tobacco environments in Scotland we present a case study of impact, reflect on the process and respond to the challenges of moving beyond ‘business as usual’ public participation towards the measurement of outcomes. In doing so we critique the way in which ‘impact’ is currently measured and suggest a move towards an enlightenment model with greater recognition of process.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages265-272
    Number of pages8
    JournalSocial Science and Medicine
    Volume168
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 29 Jun 2016

    Fingerprint

    Geography
    academy
    Social Sciences
    geography
    Health
    health
    Research
    Scotland
    Public Policy
    Tobacco
    Alcohols
    social science
    impact research
    nicotine
    funding
    alcohol
    participation
    cause
    event

    Keywords

    • United Kingdom
    • impact
    • tobacco
    • alcohol
    • health geography
    • knowledge exchange

    Cite this

    Shortt, Niamh K. ; Pearce, Jamie ; Mitchell, Richard ; Smith, Katherine E. / Taking health geography out of the academy. In: Social Science and Medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 168. pp. 265-272.
    @article{70d7702b4ec744eaaea1cc3e136c7145,
    title = "Taking health geography out of the academy",
    abstract = "In recent years the academic landscape has been shifting and significantly affected by the introduction of an ‘impact agenda’. Academics are increasingly expected to demonstrate their broader engagement with the world and evidence related outcomes. Whilst different countries are at various stages along this impact journey, the UK is the first country to link impact to funding outcomes; here impact now accounts for 20{\%} of an academic unit of assessment’s Research Excellence Framework (REF) result. This concept of ‘research impact’ implies that our work can effect change through one or more identifiable events in a direct, preferably linear and certainly measurable manner. In this paper, focusing on impact in social science, and policy-related impact in particular, we argue that such a cause and effect model is inappropriate. Furthermore that impact is not immediate or indeed linear within social science research. Drawing on recent work on alcohol and tobacco environments in Scotland we present a case study of impact, reflect on the process and respond to the challenges of moving beyond ‘business as usual’ public participation towards the measurement of outcomes. In doing so we critique the way in which ‘impact’ is currently measured and suggest a move towards an enlightenment model with greater recognition of process.",
    keywords = "United Kingdom, impact, tobacco, alcohol, health geography, knowledge exchange",
    author = "Shortt, {Niamh K.} and Jamie Pearce and Richard Mitchell and Smith, {Katherine E.}",
    year = "2016",
    month = "6",
    day = "29",
    doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.048",
    language = "English",
    volume = "168",
    pages = "265--272",
    journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
    issn = "0277-9536",

    }

    Taking health geography out of the academy. / Shortt, Niamh K.; Pearce, Jamie; Mitchell, Richard; Smith, Katherine E.

    In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 168, 29.06.2016, p. 265-272.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Taking health geography out of the academy

    AU - Shortt, Niamh K.

    AU - Pearce, Jamie

    AU - Mitchell, Richard

    AU - Smith, Katherine E.

    PY - 2016/6/29

    Y1 - 2016/6/29

    N2 - In recent years the academic landscape has been shifting and significantly affected by the introduction of an ‘impact agenda’. Academics are increasingly expected to demonstrate their broader engagement with the world and evidence related outcomes. Whilst different countries are at various stages along this impact journey, the UK is the first country to link impact to funding outcomes; here impact now accounts for 20% of an academic unit of assessment’s Research Excellence Framework (REF) result. This concept of ‘research impact’ implies that our work can effect change through one or more identifiable events in a direct, preferably linear and certainly measurable manner. In this paper, focusing on impact in social science, and policy-related impact in particular, we argue that such a cause and effect model is inappropriate. Furthermore that impact is not immediate or indeed linear within social science research. Drawing on recent work on alcohol and tobacco environments in Scotland we present a case study of impact, reflect on the process and respond to the challenges of moving beyond ‘business as usual’ public participation towards the measurement of outcomes. In doing so we critique the way in which ‘impact’ is currently measured and suggest a move towards an enlightenment model with greater recognition of process.

    AB - In recent years the academic landscape has been shifting and significantly affected by the introduction of an ‘impact agenda’. Academics are increasingly expected to demonstrate their broader engagement with the world and evidence related outcomes. Whilst different countries are at various stages along this impact journey, the UK is the first country to link impact to funding outcomes; here impact now accounts for 20% of an academic unit of assessment’s Research Excellence Framework (REF) result. This concept of ‘research impact’ implies that our work can effect change through one or more identifiable events in a direct, preferably linear and certainly measurable manner. In this paper, focusing on impact in social science, and policy-related impact in particular, we argue that such a cause and effect model is inappropriate. Furthermore that impact is not immediate or indeed linear within social science research. Drawing on recent work on alcohol and tobacco environments in Scotland we present a case study of impact, reflect on the process and respond to the challenges of moving beyond ‘business as usual’ public participation towards the measurement of outcomes. In doing so we critique the way in which ‘impact’ is currently measured and suggest a move towards an enlightenment model with greater recognition of process.

    KW - United Kingdom

    KW - impact

    KW - tobacco

    KW - alcohol

    KW - health geography

    KW - knowledge exchange

    U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.048

    DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.048

    M3 - Article

    VL - 168

    SP - 265

    EP - 272

    JO - Social Science and Medicine

    T2 - Social Science and Medicine

    JF - Social Science and Medicine

    SN - 0277-9536

    ER -