Taking foreign policy personally: personal values and foreign policy attitudes

Brian C. Rathbun, Joshua D. Kertzer, Jason Reifler, Paul Goren, Thomas J. Scotto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous research shows that, when it comes to foreign policy, individuals have general orientations that inform their beliefs toward more specific issues in international relations. But such studies evade an even more important question: what gives rise to such foreign-policy orientations in the first place? Combining an original survey on a nationally representative sample of Americans with Schwartz’s theory of values from political psychology, we show that people take foreign policy personally: the same basic values that people use to guide choices in their daily lives also travel to the domain of foreign affairs. Conservation values are most strongly linked to “militant internationalism,” a general hawkishness in international relations. The value of universalism is the most important value for predicting “cooperative internationalism,” the foreignpolicy orientation marked by a preference for multilateralism and cosmopolitanism in international affairs. This relatively parsimonious and elegant system of values and foreign-policy beliefs is consistent across both high- and low-knowledge respondents, offering one potential explanation for why those people who are otherwise uninformed about world politics nonetheless express coherent foreign-policy beliefs.
LanguageEnglish
Pages124-137
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Studies Quarterly
Volume60
Issue number1
Early online date18 Feb 2016
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 18 Feb 2016

Fingerprint

foreign policy
internationalism
Values
international relations
value
political psychology
multilateralism
world politics
universalism
cosmopolitanism
conservation
travel
knowledge

Keywords

  • foreign policy
  • international relations
  • political psychology

Cite this

Rathbun, Brian C. ; Kertzer, Joshua D. ; Reifler, Jason ; Goren, Paul ; Scotto, Thomas J. / Taking foreign policy personally : personal values and foreign policy attitudes. In: International Studies Quarterly. 2016 ; Vol. 60, No. 1. pp. 124-137.
@article{9db80bdff3d147859e83f633217f8eff,
title = "Taking foreign policy personally: personal values and foreign policy attitudes",
abstract = "Previous research shows that, when it comes to foreign policy, individuals have general orientations that inform their beliefs toward more specific issues in international relations. But such studies evade an even more important question: what gives rise to such foreign-policy orientations in the first place? Combining an original survey on a nationally representative sample of Americans with Schwartz’s theory of values from political psychology, we show that people take foreign policy personally: the same basic values that people use to guide choices in their daily lives also travel to the domain of foreign affairs. Conservation values are most strongly linked to “militant internationalism,” a general hawkishness in international relations. The value of universalism is the most important value for predicting “cooperative internationalism,” the foreignpolicy orientation marked by a preference for multilateralism and cosmopolitanism in international affairs. This relatively parsimonious and elegant system of values and foreign-policy beliefs is consistent across both high- and low-knowledge respondents, offering one potential explanation for why those people who are otherwise uninformed about world politics nonetheless express coherent foreign-policy beliefs.",
keywords = "foreign policy, international relations, political psychology",
author = "Rathbun, {Brian C.} and Kertzer, {Joshua D.} and Jason Reifler and Paul Goren and Scotto, {Thomas J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1093/isq/sqv012",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "124--137",
journal = "International Studies Quarterly",
issn = "0020-8833",
number = "1",

}

Taking foreign policy personally : personal values and foreign policy attitudes. / Rathbun, Brian C.; Kertzer, Joshua D.; Reifler, Jason; Goren, Paul; Scotto, Thomas J.

In: International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 60, No. 1, 18.02.2016, p. 124-137.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Taking foreign policy personally

T2 - International Studies Quarterly

AU - Rathbun, Brian C.

AU - Kertzer, Joshua D.

AU - Reifler, Jason

AU - Goren, Paul

AU - Scotto, Thomas J.

PY - 2016/2/18

Y1 - 2016/2/18

N2 - Previous research shows that, when it comes to foreign policy, individuals have general orientations that inform their beliefs toward more specific issues in international relations. But such studies evade an even more important question: what gives rise to such foreign-policy orientations in the first place? Combining an original survey on a nationally representative sample of Americans with Schwartz’s theory of values from political psychology, we show that people take foreign policy personally: the same basic values that people use to guide choices in their daily lives also travel to the domain of foreign affairs. Conservation values are most strongly linked to “militant internationalism,” a general hawkishness in international relations. The value of universalism is the most important value for predicting “cooperative internationalism,” the foreignpolicy orientation marked by a preference for multilateralism and cosmopolitanism in international affairs. This relatively parsimonious and elegant system of values and foreign-policy beliefs is consistent across both high- and low-knowledge respondents, offering one potential explanation for why those people who are otherwise uninformed about world politics nonetheless express coherent foreign-policy beliefs.

AB - Previous research shows that, when it comes to foreign policy, individuals have general orientations that inform their beliefs toward more specific issues in international relations. But such studies evade an even more important question: what gives rise to such foreign-policy orientations in the first place? Combining an original survey on a nationally representative sample of Americans with Schwartz’s theory of values from political psychology, we show that people take foreign policy personally: the same basic values that people use to guide choices in their daily lives also travel to the domain of foreign affairs. Conservation values are most strongly linked to “militant internationalism,” a general hawkishness in international relations. The value of universalism is the most important value for predicting “cooperative internationalism,” the foreignpolicy orientation marked by a preference for multilateralism and cosmopolitanism in international affairs. This relatively parsimonious and elegant system of values and foreign-policy beliefs is consistent across both high- and low-knowledge respondents, offering one potential explanation for why those people who are otherwise uninformed about world politics nonetheless express coherent foreign-policy beliefs.

KW - foreign policy

KW - international relations

KW - political psychology

U2 - 10.1093/isq/sqv012

DO - 10.1093/isq/sqv012

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 124

EP - 137

JO - International Studies Quarterly

JF - International Studies Quarterly

SN - 0020-8833

IS - 1

ER -