Tailoring risk management in design

M. Tegeltija; J. Oehmen; C. A. McMahon; A. Maier; I. Kozin; S. Škec

doi:10.21278/idc.2018.0385

Tailoring risk management in design

M. Tegeltija, J. Oehmen, C. A. McMahon, A. Maier, I. Kozin, S. Škec

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution book

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While risk quantification research has grown over the last few decades, only a limited number of studies have addressed the overall process integration of these approaches in design risk management. This paper argues that the choice of risk quantification method has strong implications for several process aspects. We investigate current risk management maturity models and suggest an expansion to accommodate requirements originating from the choice of quantification method, and to inform the choice of quantification method, based on other process parameters, validated through 3 case companies.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	DS 92: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference
Editors	D. Marjanović, M. Štorga, S. Škec, N. Bojčetić, N. Pavković
Place of Publication	Glasgow, UK
Pages	667-678
Number of pages	12
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0385
Publication status	Published - 24 May 2018
Event	15th International Design Conference (Design 2018) - Hotel Dubrovnik Palace, Dubrovnik, Croatia Duration: 21 May 2018 → 24 May 2018 Conference number: 15 http://www.designconference.org/

Conference

Conference	15th International Design Conference (Design 2018)
Abbreviated title	Design 2018
Country/Territory	Croatia
City	Dubrovnik
Period	21/05/18 → 24/05/18
Internet address	http://www.designconference.org/

Keywords

design process
risk management
uncertainty
risk management maturity
tailoring approach

Access to Document

10.21278/idc.2018.0385

Cite this

@inproceedings{529e5d5a38314fa9828969639bb1b806,

title = "Tailoring risk management in design",

abstract = "While risk quantification research has grown over the last few decades, only a limited number of studies have addressed the overall process integration of these approaches in design risk management. This paper argues that the choice of risk quantification method has strong implications for several process aspects. We investigate current risk management maturity models and suggest an expansion to accommodate requirements originating from the choice of quantification method, and to inform the choice of quantification method, based on other process parameters, validated through 3 case companies.",

keywords = "design process, risk management, uncertainty, risk management maturity, tailoring approach",

author = "M. Tegeltija and J. Oehmen and McMahon, {C. A.} and A. Maier and I. Kozin and S. {\v S}kec",

year = "2018",

month = may,

day = "24",

doi = "10.21278/idc.2018.0385",

language = "English",

isbn = "9789537738594",

pages = "667--678",

editor = "D. Marjanovi{\'c} and M. {\v S}torga and S. {\v S}kec and N. Boj{\v c}eti{\'c} and N. Pavkovi{\'c}",

booktitle = "DS 92: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference",

note = "15th International Design Conference (Design 2018), Design 2018 ; Conference date: 21-05-2018 Through 24-05-2018",

url = "http://www.designconference.org/",

}

Tegeltija, M, Oehmen, J, McMahon, CA, Maier, A, Kozin, I & Škec, S 2018, Tailoring risk management in design. in D Marjanović, M Štorga, S Škec, N Bojčetić & N Pavković (eds), DS 92: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference. Glasgow, UK, pp. 667-678, 15th International Design Conference (Design 2018), Dubrovnik, Croatia, 21/05/18. https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0385

TY - GEN

T1 - Tailoring risk management in design

AU - Tegeltija, M.

AU - Oehmen, J.

AU - McMahon, C. A.

AU - Maier, A.

AU - Kozin, I.

AU - Škec, S.

N1 - Conference code: 15

PY - 2018/5/24

Y1 - 2018/5/24

N2 - While risk quantification research has grown over the last few decades, only a limited number of studies have addressed the overall process integration of these approaches in design risk management. This paper argues that the choice of risk quantification method has strong implications for several process aspects. We investigate current risk management maturity models and suggest an expansion to accommodate requirements originating from the choice of quantification method, and to inform the choice of quantification method, based on other process parameters, validated through 3 case companies.

AB - While risk quantification research has grown over the last few decades, only a limited number of studies have addressed the overall process integration of these approaches in design risk management. This paper argues that the choice of risk quantification method has strong implications for several process aspects. We investigate current risk management maturity models and suggest an expansion to accommodate requirements originating from the choice of quantification method, and to inform the choice of quantification method, based on other process parameters, validated through 3 case companies.

KW - design process

KW - risk management

KW - uncertainty

KW - risk management maturity

KW - tailoring approach

U2 - 10.21278/idc.2018.0385

DO - 10.21278/idc.2018.0385

M3 - Conference contribution book

SN - 9789537738594

SP - 667

EP - 678

BT - DS 92: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference

A2 - Marjanović, D.

A2 - Štorga, M.

A2 - Škec, S.

A2 - Bojčetić, N.

A2 - Pavković, N.

CY - Glasgow, UK

T2 - 15th International Design Conference (Design 2018)

Y2 - 21 May 2018 through 24 May 2018

ER -

Tailoring risk management in design

Abstract

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this