Tactical voting and party preferences: a test of cognitive dissonance theory

Jørgen Bølstad, Elias Dinas, Pedro Riera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Studying the development of stable political attitudes, political scientists have argued that repeated voting for a political party reinforces initial party preferences, in a seemingly mechanistic process of habit-formation. However, the empirical evidence is scarce and the theoretical framework underdeveloped. Does the act of voting for a party improve an individual’s evaluation of this party? If so, is this effect simply due to habit-formation, or a more complex psychological mechanism? Drawing on cognitive dissonance theory, we examine the act of voting as a choice inducing dissonance reduction. We go beyond existing research, by focusing on tactical voters—a group for which the notion of habitual reinforcement does not predict an effect. The analyses reveal a positive effect of the act of voting tactically on the preferences for the parties voted for and may thus call for a revision of the traditional understanding of the role of voting in shaping party preferences.
LanguageEnglish
Pages429-452
Number of pages24
JournalPolitical Behavior
Volume35
Issue number3
Early online date30 Jun 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

cognitive dissonance theory
party preference
voting
habits
political scientist
political attitude
reinforcement
evaluation
evidence

Keywords

  • party preferences
  • cognitive dissonance
  • party identification
  • partisanship

Cite this

Bølstad, Jørgen ; Dinas, Elias ; Riera, Pedro. / Tactical voting and party preferences : a test of cognitive dissonance theory. In: Political Behavior. 2013 ; Vol. 35, No. 3. pp. 429-452.
@article{c175622b27a4423ea6200db3cbf0e0f0,
title = "Tactical voting and party preferences: a test of cognitive dissonance theory",
abstract = "Studying the development of stable political attitudes, political scientists have argued that repeated voting for a political party reinforces initial party preferences, in a seemingly mechanistic process of habit-formation. However, the empirical evidence is scarce and the theoretical framework underdeveloped. Does the act of voting for a party improve an individual’s evaluation of this party? If so, is this effect simply due to habit-formation, or a more complex psychological mechanism? Drawing on cognitive dissonance theory, we examine the act of voting as a choice inducing dissonance reduction. We go beyond existing research, by focusing on tactical voters—a group for which the notion of habitual reinforcement does not predict an effect. The analyses reveal a positive effect of the act of voting tactically on the preferences for the parties voted for and may thus call for a revision of the traditional understanding of the role of voting in shaping party preferences.",
keywords = "party preferences , cognitive dissonance, party identification, partisanship",
author = "J{\o}rgen B{\o}lstad and Elias Dinas and Pedro Riera",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s11109-012-9205-1",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "429--452",
journal = "Political Behavior",
issn = "0190-9320",
number = "3",

}

Tactical voting and party preferences : a test of cognitive dissonance theory. / Bølstad, Jørgen; Dinas, Elias; Riera, Pedro.

In: Political Behavior, Vol. 35, No. 3, 09.2013, p. 429-452.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tactical voting and party preferences

T2 - Political Behavior

AU - Bølstad, Jørgen

AU - Dinas, Elias

AU - Riera, Pedro

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Studying the development of stable political attitudes, political scientists have argued that repeated voting for a political party reinforces initial party preferences, in a seemingly mechanistic process of habit-formation. However, the empirical evidence is scarce and the theoretical framework underdeveloped. Does the act of voting for a party improve an individual’s evaluation of this party? If so, is this effect simply due to habit-formation, or a more complex psychological mechanism? Drawing on cognitive dissonance theory, we examine the act of voting as a choice inducing dissonance reduction. We go beyond existing research, by focusing on tactical voters—a group for which the notion of habitual reinforcement does not predict an effect. The analyses reveal a positive effect of the act of voting tactically on the preferences for the parties voted for and may thus call for a revision of the traditional understanding of the role of voting in shaping party preferences.

AB - Studying the development of stable political attitudes, political scientists have argued that repeated voting for a political party reinforces initial party preferences, in a seemingly mechanistic process of habit-formation. However, the empirical evidence is scarce and the theoretical framework underdeveloped. Does the act of voting for a party improve an individual’s evaluation of this party? If so, is this effect simply due to habit-formation, or a more complex psychological mechanism? Drawing on cognitive dissonance theory, we examine the act of voting as a choice inducing dissonance reduction. We go beyond existing research, by focusing on tactical voters—a group for which the notion of habitual reinforcement does not predict an effect. The analyses reveal a positive effect of the act of voting tactically on the preferences for the parties voted for and may thus call for a revision of the traditional understanding of the role of voting in shaping party preferences.

KW - party preferences

KW - cognitive dissonance

KW - party identification

KW - partisanship

U2 - 10.1007/s11109-012-9205-1

DO - 10.1007/s11109-012-9205-1

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 429

EP - 452

JO - Political Behavior

JF - Political Behavior

SN - 0190-9320

IS - 3

ER -