Systematic review of the relationships between sedentary behavior and health indicators in the early years (aged 0–4 years)

Veronica J. Poitras, Casey E. Gray, Xanne Janssen, Salome Aubert, Valerie Carson, Guy Faulkner, Gary S. Goldfield, John J. Reilly, Margaret Sampson, Mark S. Tremblay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the relationships between sedentary behaviour (SB) and health indicators in children aged 0 to 4 years, and to determine what doses of SB (i.e., duration, patterns [frequency, interruptions], and type) were associated with health indicators. Methods: Online databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies that met the a priori inclusion criteria: population (apparently healthy, 1 month to 4.99 years), intervention/exposure and comparator (durations, patterns, and types of SB), and outcome/health indicator (critical: adiposity, motor development, psychosocial health, cognitive development; important: bone and skeletal health, cardiometabolic health, fitness, risks/harm). The quality of the evidence was assessed by study design and outcome using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Results: Due to heterogeneity, meta-analyses were not possible; instead, narrative syntheses were conducted, structured around the health indicator and type of SB. A total of 96 studies were included (195,430 participants from 33 countries). Study designs were: randomized controlled trial (n = 1), case-control (n = 3), longitudinal (n = 25), longitudinal with additional cross-sectional analyses (n = 5), and cross-sectional (n = 62). Evidence quality ranged from “very low” to “moderate”. Associations between objectively measured total sedentary time and indicators of adiposity and motor development were predominantly null. Associations between screen time and indicators of adiposity, motor or cognitive development, and psychosocial health were primarily unfavourable or null. Associations between reading/storytelling and indicators of cognitive development were favourable or null. Associations between time spent seated (e.g., in car seats or strollers) or in the supine position, and indicators of adiposity and motor development, were primarily unfavourable or null. Data were scarce for other outcomes. Conclusions: These findings continue to support the importance of minimizing screen time for disease prevention and health promotion in the early years, but also highlight the potential cognitive benefits of interactive non-screen-based sedentary behaviours such as reading and storytelling. Additional high-quality research using valid and reliable measures is needed to more definitively establish the relationships between durations, patterns, and types of SB and health indicators, and to provide insight into the appropriate dose of SB for optimal health in the early years.
LanguageEnglish
Article number868
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume17
Issue numberSuppl 5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Health
Adiposity
Reading
Supine Position
Health Promotion
Meta-Analysis
Randomized Controlled Trials
Cross-Sectional Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Bone and Bones
Research
Population

Keywords

  • sedentary behavior
  • infants
  • toddlers
  • preschoolers
  • early years
  • screen time
  • sitting
  • reading
  • adiposity
  • motor development
  • gognitive development
  • bone and skeletal health
  • cardiometabolic health
  • fitness
  • risks

Cite this

Poitras, Veronica J. ; Gray, Casey E. ; Janssen, Xanne ; Aubert, Salome ; Carson, Valerie ; Faulkner, Guy ; Goldfield, Gary S. ; Reilly, John J. ; Sampson, Margaret ; Tremblay, Mark S. / Systematic review of the relationships between sedentary behavior and health indicators in the early years (aged 0–4 years). In: BMC Public Health. 2017 ; Vol. 17, No. Suppl 5.
@article{ba9dc6c37903445c95a83a71f623cefd,
title = "Systematic review of the relationships between sedentary behavior and health indicators in the early years (aged 0–4 years)",
abstract = "Background: The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the relationships between sedentary behaviour (SB) and health indicators in children aged 0 to 4 years, and to determine what doses of SB (i.e., duration, patterns [frequency, interruptions], and type) were associated with health indicators. Methods: Online databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies that met the a priori inclusion criteria: population (apparently healthy, 1 month to 4.99 years), intervention/exposure and comparator (durations, patterns, and types of SB), and outcome/health indicator (critical: adiposity, motor development, psychosocial health, cognitive development; important: bone and skeletal health, cardiometabolic health, fitness, risks/harm). The quality of the evidence was assessed by study design and outcome using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Results: Due to heterogeneity, meta-analyses were not possible; instead, narrative syntheses were conducted, structured around the health indicator and type of SB. A total of 96 studies were included (195,430 participants from 33 countries). Study designs were: randomized controlled trial (n = 1), case-control (n = 3), longitudinal (n = 25), longitudinal with additional cross-sectional analyses (n = 5), and cross-sectional (n = 62). Evidence quality ranged from “very low” to “moderate”. Associations between objectively measured total sedentary time and indicators of adiposity and motor development were predominantly null. Associations between screen time and indicators of adiposity, motor or cognitive development, and psychosocial health were primarily unfavourable or null. Associations between reading/storytelling and indicators of cognitive development were favourable or null. Associations between time spent seated (e.g., in car seats or strollers) or in the supine position, and indicators of adiposity and motor development, were primarily unfavourable or null. Data were scarce for other outcomes. Conclusions: These findings continue to support the importance of minimizing screen time for disease prevention and health promotion in the early years, but also highlight the potential cognitive benefits of interactive non-screen-based sedentary behaviours such as reading and storytelling. Additional high-quality research using valid and reliable measures is needed to more definitively establish the relationships between durations, patterns, and types of SB and health indicators, and to provide insight into the appropriate dose of SB for optimal health in the early years.",
keywords = "sedentary behavior, infants, toddlers, preschoolers, early years, screen time, sitting, reading, adiposity, motor development, gognitive development, bone and skeletal health, cardiometabolic health, fitness, risks",
author = "Poitras, {Veronica J.} and Gray, {Casey E.} and Xanne Janssen and Salome Aubert and Valerie Carson and Guy Faulkner and Goldfield, {Gary S.} and Reilly, {John J.} and Margaret Sampson and Tremblay, {Mark S.}",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1186/s12889-017-4849-8",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
journal = "BMC Public Health",
issn = "1471-2458",
number = "Suppl 5",

}

Systematic review of the relationships between sedentary behavior and health indicators in the early years (aged 0–4 years). / Poitras, Veronica J.; Gray, Casey E.; Janssen, Xanne; Aubert, Salome; Carson, Valerie; Faulkner, Guy; Goldfield, Gary S.; Reilly, John J.; Sampson, Margaret; Tremblay, Mark S.

In: BMC Public Health, Vol. 17, No. Suppl 5, 868, 20.11.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic review of the relationships between sedentary behavior and health indicators in the early years (aged 0–4 years)

AU - Poitras, Veronica J.

AU - Gray, Casey E.

AU - Janssen, Xanne

AU - Aubert, Salome

AU - Carson, Valerie

AU - Faulkner, Guy

AU - Goldfield, Gary S.

AU - Reilly, John J.

AU - Sampson, Margaret

AU - Tremblay, Mark S.

PY - 2017/11/20

Y1 - 2017/11/20

N2 - Background: The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the relationships between sedentary behaviour (SB) and health indicators in children aged 0 to 4 years, and to determine what doses of SB (i.e., duration, patterns [frequency, interruptions], and type) were associated with health indicators. Methods: Online databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies that met the a priori inclusion criteria: population (apparently healthy, 1 month to 4.99 years), intervention/exposure and comparator (durations, patterns, and types of SB), and outcome/health indicator (critical: adiposity, motor development, psychosocial health, cognitive development; important: bone and skeletal health, cardiometabolic health, fitness, risks/harm). The quality of the evidence was assessed by study design and outcome using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Results: Due to heterogeneity, meta-analyses were not possible; instead, narrative syntheses were conducted, structured around the health indicator and type of SB. A total of 96 studies were included (195,430 participants from 33 countries). Study designs were: randomized controlled trial (n = 1), case-control (n = 3), longitudinal (n = 25), longitudinal with additional cross-sectional analyses (n = 5), and cross-sectional (n = 62). Evidence quality ranged from “very low” to “moderate”. Associations between objectively measured total sedentary time and indicators of adiposity and motor development were predominantly null. Associations between screen time and indicators of adiposity, motor or cognitive development, and psychosocial health were primarily unfavourable or null. Associations between reading/storytelling and indicators of cognitive development were favourable or null. Associations between time spent seated (e.g., in car seats or strollers) or in the supine position, and indicators of adiposity and motor development, were primarily unfavourable or null. Data were scarce for other outcomes. Conclusions: These findings continue to support the importance of minimizing screen time for disease prevention and health promotion in the early years, but also highlight the potential cognitive benefits of interactive non-screen-based sedentary behaviours such as reading and storytelling. Additional high-quality research using valid and reliable measures is needed to more definitively establish the relationships between durations, patterns, and types of SB and health indicators, and to provide insight into the appropriate dose of SB for optimal health in the early years.

AB - Background: The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the relationships between sedentary behaviour (SB) and health indicators in children aged 0 to 4 years, and to determine what doses of SB (i.e., duration, patterns [frequency, interruptions], and type) were associated with health indicators. Methods: Online databases were searched for peer-reviewed studies that met the a priori inclusion criteria: population (apparently healthy, 1 month to 4.99 years), intervention/exposure and comparator (durations, patterns, and types of SB), and outcome/health indicator (critical: adiposity, motor development, psychosocial health, cognitive development; important: bone and skeletal health, cardiometabolic health, fitness, risks/harm). The quality of the evidence was assessed by study design and outcome using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Results: Due to heterogeneity, meta-analyses were not possible; instead, narrative syntheses were conducted, structured around the health indicator and type of SB. A total of 96 studies were included (195,430 participants from 33 countries). Study designs were: randomized controlled trial (n = 1), case-control (n = 3), longitudinal (n = 25), longitudinal with additional cross-sectional analyses (n = 5), and cross-sectional (n = 62). Evidence quality ranged from “very low” to “moderate”. Associations between objectively measured total sedentary time and indicators of adiposity and motor development were predominantly null. Associations between screen time and indicators of adiposity, motor or cognitive development, and psychosocial health were primarily unfavourable or null. Associations between reading/storytelling and indicators of cognitive development were favourable or null. Associations between time spent seated (e.g., in car seats or strollers) or in the supine position, and indicators of adiposity and motor development, were primarily unfavourable or null. Data were scarce for other outcomes. Conclusions: These findings continue to support the importance of minimizing screen time for disease prevention and health promotion in the early years, but also highlight the potential cognitive benefits of interactive non-screen-based sedentary behaviours such as reading and storytelling. Additional high-quality research using valid and reliable measures is needed to more definitively establish the relationships between durations, patterns, and types of SB and health indicators, and to provide insight into the appropriate dose of SB for optimal health in the early years.

KW - sedentary behavior

KW - infants

KW - toddlers

KW - preschoolers

KW - early years

KW - screen time

KW - sitting

KW - reading

KW - adiposity

KW - motor development

KW - gognitive development

KW - bone and skeletal health

KW - cardiometabolic health

KW - fitness

KW - risks

U2 - 10.1186/s12889-017-4849-8

DO - 10.1186/s12889-017-4849-8

M3 - Article

VL - 17

JO - BMC Public Health

T2 - BMC Public Health

JF - BMC Public Health

SN - 1471-2458

IS - Suppl 5

M1 - 868

ER -