Systematic comparison of hydrogen production from fossil fuels and biomass resources

Peng Kang, Gary Morrow, Xiaolei Zhang, Tipeng Wang, Zhoufu Tan, Jayant Agarwal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Fossil fuels are the main energy source to satisfy the worldwide energy demands. However, the energy demands are increasing and the supply of fossil fuels is decreasing, thus many countries are looking for other fuel sources. Differing from the traditional fuels, hydrogen is considered as one of the most promising energy sources due to its intrinsic features such as clean, efficient, safe and sustainable. Developing novel technologies for hydrogen production from renewable sources (such as biomass) becomes a core area for the investigation of hydrogen industry. Within this work, different pathways for hydrogen production including steam reforming, electrolysis, and biomass gasification have been systematically compared in terms of yield and cost. This comparison is unique since the systematic evaluation was conducted from many aspects for all the hydrogen production pathways, especially those by involving the biomass gasification that still lack of available literatures. The assessment methods involved energy analysis, exergy analysis and economic analysis. It was concluded that steam reforming remains the cheapest method of hydrogen production at 1.748 $/kg, however, steam reforming is not an ideal process currently or for the future, gasification and electrolysis remains competitive with high yield but requires relatively high initial and annual expenditure. For biomass gasification, though its energy efficiency is lower than steam reforming, it has relatively higher mass yield, demonstrating the feasibility of this process for hydrogen production. Further for biomass gasification, the selection of correct feedstock is a key to maximize its yield, i.e. a yield of 82.47% is possible with corn stover fed gasification.
LanguageEnglish
Pages192-200
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Hydrogen production
Fossil fuels
Gasification
Biomass
Steam reforming
Electrolysis
Hydrogen fuels
Exergy
Economic analysis
Feedstocks
Energy efficiency
Hydrogen
Costs
Industry

Keywords

  • hydrogen production
  • biomass feedstock
  • gasification
  • pyrolysis
  • fossil fuel
  • techno-economic assessment
  • exergy

Cite this

Kang, Peng ; Morrow, Gary ; Zhang, Xiaolei ; Wang, Tipeng ; Tan, Zhoufu ; Agarwal, Jayant. / Systematic comparison of hydrogen production from fossil fuels and biomass resources. 2017 ; Vol. 10, No. 6. pp. 192-200.
@article{2bee9c1d6e9547008b9ad708cf143db2,
title = "Systematic comparison of hydrogen production from fossil fuels and biomass resources",
abstract = "Fossil fuels are the main energy source to satisfy the worldwide energy demands. However, the energy demands are increasing and the supply of fossil fuels is decreasing, thus many countries are looking for other fuel sources. Differing from the traditional fuels, hydrogen is considered as one of the most promising energy sources due to its intrinsic features such as clean, efficient, safe and sustainable. Developing novel technologies for hydrogen production from renewable sources (such as biomass) becomes a core area for the investigation of hydrogen industry. Within this work, different pathways for hydrogen production including steam reforming, electrolysis, and biomass gasification have been systematically compared in terms of yield and cost. This comparison is unique since the systematic evaluation was conducted from many aspects for all the hydrogen production pathways, especially those by involving the biomass gasification that still lack of available literatures. The assessment methods involved energy analysis, exergy analysis and economic analysis. It was concluded that steam reforming remains the cheapest method of hydrogen production at 1.748 $/kg, however, steam reforming is not an ideal process currently or for the future, gasification and electrolysis remains competitive with high yield but requires relatively high initial and annual expenditure. For biomass gasification, though its energy efficiency is lower than steam reforming, it has relatively higher mass yield, demonstrating the feasibility of this process for hydrogen production. Further for biomass gasification, the selection of correct feedstock is a key to maximize its yield, i.e. a yield of 82.47{\%} is possible with corn stover fed gasification.",
keywords = "hydrogen production, biomass feedstock, gasification, pyrolysis, fossil fuel, techno-economic assessment, exergy",
author = "Peng Kang and Gary Morrow and Xiaolei Zhang and Tipeng Wang and Zhoufu Tan and Jayant Agarwal",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "30",
doi = "10.25165/j.ijABE.20171006.2990",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "192--200",
number = "6",

}

Systematic comparison of hydrogen production from fossil fuels and biomass resources. / Kang, Peng; Morrow, Gary; Zhang, Xiaolei; Wang, Tipeng; Tan, Zhoufu; Agarwal, Jayant.

Vol. 10, No. 6, 30.11.2017, p. 192-200.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic comparison of hydrogen production from fossil fuels and biomass resources

AU - Kang, Peng

AU - Morrow, Gary

AU - Zhang, Xiaolei

AU - Wang, Tipeng

AU - Tan, Zhoufu

AU - Agarwal, Jayant

PY - 2017/11/30

Y1 - 2017/11/30

N2 - Fossil fuels are the main energy source to satisfy the worldwide energy demands. However, the energy demands are increasing and the supply of fossil fuels is decreasing, thus many countries are looking for other fuel sources. Differing from the traditional fuels, hydrogen is considered as one of the most promising energy sources due to its intrinsic features such as clean, efficient, safe and sustainable. Developing novel technologies for hydrogen production from renewable sources (such as biomass) becomes a core area for the investigation of hydrogen industry. Within this work, different pathways for hydrogen production including steam reforming, electrolysis, and biomass gasification have been systematically compared in terms of yield and cost. This comparison is unique since the systematic evaluation was conducted from many aspects for all the hydrogen production pathways, especially those by involving the biomass gasification that still lack of available literatures. The assessment methods involved energy analysis, exergy analysis and economic analysis. It was concluded that steam reforming remains the cheapest method of hydrogen production at 1.748 $/kg, however, steam reforming is not an ideal process currently or for the future, gasification and electrolysis remains competitive with high yield but requires relatively high initial and annual expenditure. For biomass gasification, though its energy efficiency is lower than steam reforming, it has relatively higher mass yield, demonstrating the feasibility of this process for hydrogen production. Further for biomass gasification, the selection of correct feedstock is a key to maximize its yield, i.e. a yield of 82.47% is possible with corn stover fed gasification.

AB - Fossil fuels are the main energy source to satisfy the worldwide energy demands. However, the energy demands are increasing and the supply of fossil fuels is decreasing, thus many countries are looking for other fuel sources. Differing from the traditional fuels, hydrogen is considered as one of the most promising energy sources due to its intrinsic features such as clean, efficient, safe and sustainable. Developing novel technologies for hydrogen production from renewable sources (such as biomass) becomes a core area for the investigation of hydrogen industry. Within this work, different pathways for hydrogen production including steam reforming, electrolysis, and biomass gasification have been systematically compared in terms of yield and cost. This comparison is unique since the systematic evaluation was conducted from many aspects for all the hydrogen production pathways, especially those by involving the biomass gasification that still lack of available literatures. The assessment methods involved energy analysis, exergy analysis and economic analysis. It was concluded that steam reforming remains the cheapest method of hydrogen production at 1.748 $/kg, however, steam reforming is not an ideal process currently or for the future, gasification and electrolysis remains competitive with high yield but requires relatively high initial and annual expenditure. For biomass gasification, though its energy efficiency is lower than steam reforming, it has relatively higher mass yield, demonstrating the feasibility of this process for hydrogen production. Further for biomass gasification, the selection of correct feedstock is a key to maximize its yield, i.e. a yield of 82.47% is possible with corn stover fed gasification.

KW - hydrogen production

KW - biomass feedstock

KW - gasification

KW - pyrolysis

KW - fossil fuel

KW - techno-economic assessment

KW - exergy

UR - https://ijabe.org/index.php/ijabe

U2 - 10.25165/j.ijABE.20171006.2990

DO - 10.25165/j.ijABE.20171006.2990

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 192

EP - 200

IS - 6

ER -