Surrogacy in the United Kingdom: an inappropriate use of the welfare principle

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter offers a critique of the approach of the English courts, exemplified in Re X (A Child) 2014, that applies the welfare test to the determination of all issues raised in applications for a parental order after surrogacy. It is argued that the welfare tets applies only once the application has been found to be competently made, and that the failure to recognise this risks subverting parliamentary intention as well as preferencing the needs of an individual child over the welfare of children in general.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationImplementing Article 3 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child
Subtitle of host publicationBest Interests, Welfare and Well-being
EditorsElaine E. Sutherland, Lesley-Anne Barnes Macfarlane
Place of PublicationCambridge
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages165-179
Number of pages15
ISBN (Print)9781107158252
Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • surrogacy
  • welfare
  • parental orders
  • adoption
  • statutory time limits

Cite this

Norrie, K. (2016). Surrogacy in the United Kingdom: an inappropriate use of the welfare principle. In E. E. Sutherland, & L-A. Barnes Macfarlane (Eds.), Implementing Article 3 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: Best Interests, Welfare and Well-being (pp. 165-179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.