Supporting desistance in probation practice: a response to Maruna, Porter and Carvalho

F. McNeill

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    22 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The author argues that a major challenge of Maruna, Porter and Carvalho’s paper and other work detailing similar research, lies not only in its questioning of how probation work should be undertaken, but also of how it should actually be conceived. In particular, he considers that this body of work undermines the correctionalist paradigm which often dominates current interpretations of effective practice.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)241-247
    Number of pages7
    JournalProbation Journal
    Volume51
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Keywords

    • desistance
    • probation
    • correctionalism

    Cite this