Supporting desistance in probation practice: a response to Maruna, Porter and Carvalho

F. McNeill

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

    20 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The author argues that a major challenge of Maruna, Porter and Carvalho’s paper and other work detailing similar research, lies not only in its questioning of how probation work should be undertaken, but also of how it should actually be conceived. In particular, he considers that this body of work undermines the correctionalist paradigm which often dominates current interpretations of effective practice.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages241-247
    Number of pages7
    JournalProbation Journal
    Volume51
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Fingerprint

    probation
    paradigm
    interpretation

    Keywords

    • desistance
    • probation
    • correctionalism

    Cite this

    McNeill, F. / Supporting desistance in probation practice: a response to Maruna, Porter and Carvalho. In: Probation Journal. 2004 ; Vol. 51, No. 3. pp. 241-247.
    @article{516de3eac2a24e2a864df0903c30b43a,
    title = "Supporting desistance in probation practice: a response to Maruna, Porter and Carvalho",
    abstract = "The author argues that a major challenge of Maruna, Porter and Carvalho’s paper and other work detailing similar research, lies not only in its questioning of how probation work should be undertaken, but also of how it should actually be conceived. In particular, he considers that this body of work undermines the correctionalist paradigm which often dominates current interpretations of effective practice.",
    keywords = "desistance , probation, correctionalism",
    author = "F. McNeill",
    year = "2004",
    doi = "10.1177/0264550504046746",
    language = "English",
    volume = "51",
    pages = "241--247",
    journal = "Probation Journal",
    issn = "0264-5505",
    number = "3",

    }

    McNeill, F 2004, 'Supporting desistance in probation practice: a response to Maruna, Porter and Carvalho' Probation Journal, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 241-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550504046746

    Supporting desistance in probation practice: a response to Maruna, Porter and Carvalho. / McNeill, F.

    In: Probation Journal, Vol. 51, No. 3, 2004, p. 241-247.

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Supporting desistance in probation practice: a response to Maruna, Porter and Carvalho

    AU - McNeill, F.

    PY - 2004

    Y1 - 2004

    N2 - The author argues that a major challenge of Maruna, Porter and Carvalho’s paper and other work detailing similar research, lies not only in its questioning of how probation work should be undertaken, but also of how it should actually be conceived. In particular, he considers that this body of work undermines the correctionalist paradigm which often dominates current interpretations of effective practice.

    AB - The author argues that a major challenge of Maruna, Porter and Carvalho’s paper and other work detailing similar research, lies not only in its questioning of how probation work should be undertaken, but also of how it should actually be conceived. In particular, he considers that this body of work undermines the correctionalist paradigm which often dominates current interpretations of effective practice.

    KW - desistance

    KW - probation

    KW - correctionalism

    U2 - 10.1177/0264550504046746

    DO - 10.1177/0264550504046746

    M3 - Article

    VL - 51

    SP - 241

    EP - 247

    JO - Probation Journal

    T2 - Probation Journal

    JF - Probation Journal

    SN - 0264-5505

    IS - 3

    ER -

    McNeill F. Supporting desistance in probation practice: a response to Maruna, Porter and Carvalho. Probation Journal. 2004;51(3):241-247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550504046746

    Access to Document