Support for democracy in Africa: intrinsic or instrumental?

Robert Mattes, Michael Bratton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

154 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Comparative analysis of original survey data from Ghana, Zambia and South Africa is used here to assess the attitudes of African citizens towards democracy. Is democracy valued intrinsically (as an end in itself) or instrumentally (for example, as a means to improving material living standards)? We find as much popular support for democracy in Africa as in other Third Wave regions but less satisfaction with the performance of elected governments. The fact that Africans support democracy while being discontented with its achievements implies a measure of intrinsic support that supersedes instrumental considerations. At the same time, approval of democracy remains performance-driven; but approval hinges less on the government's capacity at delivering economic goods than its ability to guarantee basic political rights. Our findings extend recent arguments about the importance of political goods in regime consolidation and call into question the conventional wisdom that governments in new democracies legitimate themselves mainly through economic performance.
LanguageEnglish
Article number31
Pages447-474
Number of pages28
JournalBritish Journal of Political Science
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jul 2001

Fingerprint

democracy
economic goods
performance
political right
living standard
Zambia
Ghana
consolidation
wisdom
guarantee
regime
citizen
ability
economics

Keywords

  • African citizens
  • African democracy
  • South Africa

Cite this

@article{d20d254e0b1741f48ccc85d1c3f466ac,
title = "Support for democracy in Africa: intrinsic or instrumental?",
abstract = "Comparative analysis of original survey data from Ghana, Zambia and South Africa is used here to assess the attitudes of African citizens towards democracy. Is democracy valued intrinsically (as an end in itself) or instrumentally (for example, as a means to improving material living standards)? We find as much popular support for democracy in Africa as in other Third Wave regions but less satisfaction with the performance of elected governments. The fact that Africans support democracy while being discontented with its achievements implies a measure of intrinsic support that supersedes instrumental considerations. At the same time, approval of democracy remains performance-driven; but approval hinges less on the government's capacity at delivering economic goods than its ability to guarantee basic political rights. Our findings extend recent arguments about the importance of political goods in regime consolidation and call into question the conventional wisdom that governments in new democracies legitimate themselves mainly through economic performance.",
keywords = "African citizens, African democracy, South Africa",
author = "Robert Mattes and Michael Bratton",
year = "2001",
month = "7",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1017/S0007123401000175",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "447--474",
journal = "British Journal of Political Science",
issn = "0007-1234",
number = "3",

}

Support for democracy in Africa : intrinsic or instrumental? / Mattes, Robert; Bratton, Michael.

In: British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 31, No. 3, 31, 31.07.2001, p. 447-474.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Support for democracy in Africa

T2 - British Journal of Political Science

AU - Mattes, Robert

AU - Bratton, Michael

PY - 2001/7/31

Y1 - 2001/7/31

N2 - Comparative analysis of original survey data from Ghana, Zambia and South Africa is used here to assess the attitudes of African citizens towards democracy. Is democracy valued intrinsically (as an end in itself) or instrumentally (for example, as a means to improving material living standards)? We find as much popular support for democracy in Africa as in other Third Wave regions but less satisfaction with the performance of elected governments. The fact that Africans support democracy while being discontented with its achievements implies a measure of intrinsic support that supersedes instrumental considerations. At the same time, approval of democracy remains performance-driven; but approval hinges less on the government's capacity at delivering economic goods than its ability to guarantee basic political rights. Our findings extend recent arguments about the importance of political goods in regime consolidation and call into question the conventional wisdom that governments in new democracies legitimate themselves mainly through economic performance.

AB - Comparative analysis of original survey data from Ghana, Zambia and South Africa is used here to assess the attitudes of African citizens towards democracy. Is democracy valued intrinsically (as an end in itself) or instrumentally (for example, as a means to improving material living standards)? We find as much popular support for democracy in Africa as in other Third Wave regions but less satisfaction with the performance of elected governments. The fact that Africans support democracy while being discontented with its achievements implies a measure of intrinsic support that supersedes instrumental considerations. At the same time, approval of democracy remains performance-driven; but approval hinges less on the government's capacity at delivering economic goods than its ability to guarantee basic political rights. Our findings extend recent arguments about the importance of political goods in regime consolidation and call into question the conventional wisdom that governments in new democracies legitimate themselves mainly through economic performance.

KW - African citizens

KW - African democracy

KW - South Africa

U2 - 10.1017/S0007123401000175

DO - 10.1017/S0007123401000175

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 447

EP - 474

JO - British Journal of Political Science

JF - British Journal of Political Science

SN - 0007-1234

IS - 3

M1 - 31

ER -