Supply chain risk management: systematic literature review and a conceptual framework for capturing interdependencies between risks

Abroon Qazi, John Quigley, Alex Dickson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution book

15 Citations (Scopus)
201 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to conduct a comprehensive and systematic review of the literature in the field of 'Supply Chain Risk Management' and identify important research gaps for potential research. Furthermore, a conceptual risk management framework is also proposed that encompasses holistic view of the field. 'Systematic Literature Review' method is used to examine quality articles published over a time period of almost 15 years (2000 - June, 2014). The findings of the study are validated through text mining software. Systematic literature review has identified the progress of research based on various descriptive and thematic typologies. The review and text mining analysis have also provided an insight into major research gaps. Based on the identified gaps, a framework is developed that can help researchers model interdependencies between risk factors.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
Pages1-13
Number of pages13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Apr 2015
Event5th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, IEOM 2015 - Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Duration: 3 Mar 20155 Mar 2015

Conference

Conference5th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, IEOM 2015
CountryUnited Arab Emirates
CityDubai
Period3/03/155/03/15

Keywords

  • holistic approach
  • risk management framework
  • supply chain risk management
  • systematic literature review
  • text mining

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Supply chain risk management: systematic literature review and a conceptual framework for capturing interdependencies between risks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this