Sunbelt scholarship and silos

Lucas Richert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The last five years have witnessed a series of books exploring the post–World War II rise and growth of the American West and South, an area of the United States sometimes called the Sunbelt. The term, coined in1969 by Kevin Phillips, identified a rather amorphous region that was undergoing rapid transformation and was, therefore, vital for long-term Republican electoral success. However, scholars do not universally accept the “Sunbelt Phenomenon,” nor has the concept produced intellectual consensus. Instead, authors are now rethinking previous methodologies about the United States after World War II and reformulating the configuration of social, political, and economic categories of analysis. The Sunbelt concept is now being renegotiated. In recent years, works by Michelle Nickerson and Darren Dochuk; Jeff Roche; Elizabeth Tandy Shermer; and Kim Phillips-Fein and Julian Zelizer have signalled the energy of the debates as well as the evolving literature as a whole. Problematically, as much as this new literature shows expansion, the scholarship also demonstrates a small, though consequential, silo mentality.
LanguageEnglish
Pages547-554
Number of pages8
JournalCanadian Review of American Studies
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Oct 2014

Fingerprint

World War II
mentality
energy
methodology
economics
literature
Sunbelt
Silo
Second World War
American South
Republican
Energy
American West
Economics
Rise
Mentality
Methodology

Keywords

  • Sunbelt
  • post-World War II
  • United States
  • Kevin Phillips
  • historiography
  • silo

Cite this

Richert, Lucas. / Sunbelt scholarship and silos. In: Canadian Review of American Studies. 2014 ; Vol. 44, No. 3. pp. 547-554.
@article{5059ae40494b4367804d10d165994060,
title = "Sunbelt scholarship and silos",
abstract = "The last five years have witnessed a series of books exploring the post–World War II rise and growth of the American West and South, an area of the United States sometimes called the Sunbelt. The term, coined in1969 by Kevin Phillips, identified a rather amorphous region that was undergoing rapid transformation and was, therefore, vital for long-term Republican electoral success. However, scholars do not universally accept the “Sunbelt Phenomenon,” nor has the concept produced intellectual consensus. Instead, authors are now rethinking previous methodologies about the United States after World War II and reformulating the configuration of social, political, and economic categories of analysis. The Sunbelt concept is now being renegotiated. In recent years, works by Michelle Nickerson and Darren Dochuk; Jeff Roche; Elizabeth Tandy Shermer; and Kim Phillips-Fein and Julian Zelizer have signalled the energy of the debates as well as the evolving literature as a whole. Problematically, as much as this new literature shows expansion, the scholarship also demonstrates a small, though consequential, silo mentality.",
keywords = "Sunbelt, post-World War II , United States, Kevin Phillips, historiography, silo",
author = "Lucas Richert",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "15",
doi = "10.3138/2014.006",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "547--554",
journal = "Canadian Review of American Studies",
issn = "0007-7720",
number = "3",

}

Sunbelt scholarship and silos. / Richert, Lucas.

In: Canadian Review of American Studies, Vol. 44, No. 3, 15.10.2014, p. 547-554.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sunbelt scholarship and silos

AU - Richert, Lucas

PY - 2014/10/15

Y1 - 2014/10/15

N2 - The last five years have witnessed a series of books exploring the post–World War II rise and growth of the American West and South, an area of the United States sometimes called the Sunbelt. The term, coined in1969 by Kevin Phillips, identified a rather amorphous region that was undergoing rapid transformation and was, therefore, vital for long-term Republican electoral success. However, scholars do not universally accept the “Sunbelt Phenomenon,” nor has the concept produced intellectual consensus. Instead, authors are now rethinking previous methodologies about the United States after World War II and reformulating the configuration of social, political, and economic categories of analysis. The Sunbelt concept is now being renegotiated. In recent years, works by Michelle Nickerson and Darren Dochuk; Jeff Roche; Elizabeth Tandy Shermer; and Kim Phillips-Fein and Julian Zelizer have signalled the energy of the debates as well as the evolving literature as a whole. Problematically, as much as this new literature shows expansion, the scholarship also demonstrates a small, though consequential, silo mentality.

AB - The last five years have witnessed a series of books exploring the post–World War II rise and growth of the American West and South, an area of the United States sometimes called the Sunbelt. The term, coined in1969 by Kevin Phillips, identified a rather amorphous region that was undergoing rapid transformation and was, therefore, vital for long-term Republican electoral success. However, scholars do not universally accept the “Sunbelt Phenomenon,” nor has the concept produced intellectual consensus. Instead, authors are now rethinking previous methodologies about the United States after World War II and reformulating the configuration of social, political, and economic categories of analysis. The Sunbelt concept is now being renegotiated. In recent years, works by Michelle Nickerson and Darren Dochuk; Jeff Roche; Elizabeth Tandy Shermer; and Kim Phillips-Fein and Julian Zelizer have signalled the energy of the debates as well as the evolving literature as a whole. Problematically, as much as this new literature shows expansion, the scholarship also demonstrates a small, though consequential, silo mentality.

KW - Sunbelt

KW - post-World War II

KW - United States

KW - Kevin Phillips

KW - historiography

KW - silo

UR - http://www.utpjournals.com/Canadian-Review-of-American-Studies.html

U2 - 10.3138/2014.006

DO - 10.3138/2014.006

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 547

EP - 554

JO - Canadian Review of American Studies

T2 - Canadian Review of American Studies

JF - Canadian Review of American Studies

SN - 0007-7720

IS - 3

ER -