TY - BOOK
T1 - Study on Experiences Gained with the Development and Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol and Other Multilateral Mechanisms and the Potential Relevance of Ongoing Work Undertaken by Other Processes, Including Case Studies
AU - Morgera, Elisa
N1 - EXPERT GROUP MEETING ON ARTICLE 10 OF
THE NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND
BENEFIT-SHARING
Montreal, Canada, 1-3 February 2016
Item 3 of the provisional agenda*
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - This study was requested by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Nagoya Protocol in 2014 (decision NP-1/10) to analyse: (i) the experiences gained with the development and implementation of the Nagoya Protocol and other multilateral mechanisms; and (ii) the potential relevance of ongoing work undertaken by other processes, including case studies in relation to ex situ and in situ genetic resources, traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources, and transboundary situations. Some experience has been gained so far with the development and implementation of the Nagoya Protocol at the national and regional levels, with regard to “situations in which it is not possible to provide prior informed consent,“ “transboundary situations“ and “contributions to conservation andsustainable use“. The selected case studies provide evidence of stakeholders’ voluntary initiatives that can contribute to multilateral benefit-sharing mechanisms or complement them.
AB - This study was requested by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Nagoya Protocol in 2014 (decision NP-1/10) to analyse: (i) the experiences gained with the development and implementation of the Nagoya Protocol and other multilateral mechanisms; and (ii) the potential relevance of ongoing work undertaken by other processes, including case studies in relation to ex situ and in situ genetic resources, traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources, and transboundary situations. Some experience has been gained so far with the development and implementation of the Nagoya Protocol at the national and regional levels, with regard to “situations in which it is not possible to provide prior informed consent,“ “transboundary situations“ and “contributions to conservation andsustainable use“. The selected case studies provide evidence of stakeholders’ voluntary initiatives that can contribute to multilateral benefit-sharing mechanisms or complement them.
KW - Nagoya protocol
KW - multilateral benefit-sharing mechanism
KW - conservation
M3 - Commissioned report
BT - Study on Experiences Gained with the Development and Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol and Other Multilateral Mechanisms and the Potential Relevance of Ongoing Work Undertaken by Other Processes, Including Case Studies
CY - Montreal, Canada
ER -