Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in practice: a literature review of method combinations

Mika Marttunen, Judit Lienert, Valerie Belton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) has attracted increasing attention over the past 20 years from both a conceptual and a practical perspective. This is reflected in a significant growth in the number of published applications which use a formal approach to problem structuring in combination with an analytic method for multi-criteria analysis. The problem structuring approaches (PSMs) include general methodologies such as Checkland's Soft Systems Method (SSM), Eden and Ackermann's Strategic Options Design and Analysis (SODA) and other methods that focus on a particular aspect. We carried out a literature review that covers eight PSMs (Cognitive and Causal Maps, DPSIR, Scenario Planning, SSM, Stakeholder Analysis, Strategic Choice Approach, SODA and SWOT) and seven MCDA methods (AHP, ANP, ELECTRE, MAUT, MAVT, PROMETHEE and TOPSIS). We first identified and analysed 333 articles published during 2000-2015, then selected 68 articles covering all PSM-MCDA combinations, which were studied in detail to understand the associated processes, benefits and challenges. The three PSMs most commonly combined with MCDA are SWOT, Scenario Planning and DPSIR. AHP was by far the most commonly applied MCDA method. Combining PSMs with MCDA produces a richer view of the decision situation and enables more effective support for different phases of the decision-making process. Some limitations and challenges in combining PSMs and MCDA are also identified, most importantly relating to building a value tree and assigning criteria weights.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-17
Number of pages17
JournalEuropean Journal of Operational Research
Volume263
Issue number1
Early online date28 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Multi-criteria Decision Analysis
Decision theory
Literature Review
Planning
Multi Criteria Analysis
TOPSIS
Scenarios
Multi-criteria decision analysis
Literature review
Problem structuring
Covering
Decision making
Decision Making
Cover
Methodology

Keywords

  • problem structuring
  • muliple criteria decision analysis
  • multi-methodology
  • multi-stakeholder decision making

Cite this

@article{dbc90606604346b7977abf9493b23b30,
title = "Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in practice: a literature review of method combinations",
abstract = "Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) has attracted increasing attention over the past 20 years from both a conceptual and a practical perspective. This is reflected in a significant growth in the number of published applications which use a formal approach to problem structuring in combination with an analytic method for multi-criteria analysis. The problem structuring approaches (PSMs) include general methodologies such as Checkland's Soft Systems Method (SSM), Eden and Ackermann's Strategic Options Design and Analysis (SODA) and other methods that focus on a particular aspect. We carried out a literature review that covers eight PSMs (Cognitive and Causal Maps, DPSIR, Scenario Planning, SSM, Stakeholder Analysis, Strategic Choice Approach, SODA and SWOT) and seven MCDA methods (AHP, ANP, ELECTRE, MAUT, MAVT, PROMETHEE and TOPSIS). We first identified and analysed 333 articles published during 2000-2015, then selected 68 articles covering all PSM-MCDA combinations, which were studied in detail to understand the associated processes, benefits and challenges. The three PSMs most commonly combined with MCDA are SWOT, Scenario Planning and DPSIR. AHP was by far the most commonly applied MCDA method. Combining PSMs with MCDA produces a richer view of the decision situation and enables more effective support for different phases of the decision-making process. Some limitations and challenges in combining PSMs and MCDA are also identified, most importantly relating to building a value tree and assigning criteria weights.",
keywords = "problem structuring, muliple criteria decision analysis, multi-methodology, multi-stakeholder decision making",
author = "Mika Marttunen and Judit Lienert and Valerie Belton",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.041",
language = "English",
volume = "263",
pages = "1--17",
journal = "European Journal of Operational Research",
issn = "0377-2217",
number = "1",

}

Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in practice : a literature review of method combinations. / Marttunen, Mika; Lienert, Judit; Belton, Valerie.

In: European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 263, No. 1, 16.11.2017, p. 1-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in practice

T2 - European Journal of Operational Research

AU - Marttunen, Mika

AU - Lienert, Judit

AU - Belton, Valerie

PY - 2017/11/16

Y1 - 2017/11/16

N2 - Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) has attracted increasing attention over the past 20 years from both a conceptual and a practical perspective. This is reflected in a significant growth in the number of published applications which use a formal approach to problem structuring in combination with an analytic method for multi-criteria analysis. The problem structuring approaches (PSMs) include general methodologies such as Checkland's Soft Systems Method (SSM), Eden and Ackermann's Strategic Options Design and Analysis (SODA) and other methods that focus on a particular aspect. We carried out a literature review that covers eight PSMs (Cognitive and Causal Maps, DPSIR, Scenario Planning, SSM, Stakeholder Analysis, Strategic Choice Approach, SODA and SWOT) and seven MCDA methods (AHP, ANP, ELECTRE, MAUT, MAVT, PROMETHEE and TOPSIS). We first identified and analysed 333 articles published during 2000-2015, then selected 68 articles covering all PSM-MCDA combinations, which were studied in detail to understand the associated processes, benefits and challenges. The three PSMs most commonly combined with MCDA are SWOT, Scenario Planning and DPSIR. AHP was by far the most commonly applied MCDA method. Combining PSMs with MCDA produces a richer view of the decision situation and enables more effective support for different phases of the decision-making process. Some limitations and challenges in combining PSMs and MCDA are also identified, most importantly relating to building a value tree and assigning criteria weights.

AB - Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) has attracted increasing attention over the past 20 years from both a conceptual and a practical perspective. This is reflected in a significant growth in the number of published applications which use a formal approach to problem structuring in combination with an analytic method for multi-criteria analysis. The problem structuring approaches (PSMs) include general methodologies such as Checkland's Soft Systems Method (SSM), Eden and Ackermann's Strategic Options Design and Analysis (SODA) and other methods that focus on a particular aspect. We carried out a literature review that covers eight PSMs (Cognitive and Causal Maps, DPSIR, Scenario Planning, SSM, Stakeholder Analysis, Strategic Choice Approach, SODA and SWOT) and seven MCDA methods (AHP, ANP, ELECTRE, MAUT, MAVT, PROMETHEE and TOPSIS). We first identified and analysed 333 articles published during 2000-2015, then selected 68 articles covering all PSM-MCDA combinations, which were studied in detail to understand the associated processes, benefits and challenges. The three PSMs most commonly combined with MCDA are SWOT, Scenario Planning and DPSIR. AHP was by far the most commonly applied MCDA method. Combining PSMs with MCDA produces a richer view of the decision situation and enables more effective support for different phases of the decision-making process. Some limitations and challenges in combining PSMs and MCDA are also identified, most importantly relating to building a value tree and assigning criteria weights.

KW - problem structuring

KW - muliple criteria decision analysis

KW - multi-methodology

KW - multi-stakeholder decision making

UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03772217

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.041

DO - 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.041

M3 - Article

VL - 263

SP - 1

EP - 17

JO - European Journal of Operational Research

JF - European Journal of Operational Research

SN - 0377-2217

IS - 1

ER -