Structuring a delay and disruption claim: an application of cause-mapping and system dynamics

T. Williams, F. Ackermann, C. Eden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The idea of "Delay and Disruption" within projects is well-known and is often the subject of litigation claims. However, the term is ill-defined, and it is difficult to justify such claims within a legal process. This paper demonstrates a well-developed approach, which is a logical, transparent, auditable and sustainable means of presenting such a claim. It describes the format for a claim document that presents first the disruptive triggers, then using a formal qualitative model builds the case from the interacting effects of these triggers. Transformation of this model into a computer simulation and the ability to explore different scenarios provides the quantitative part of the claim document. Thus three elements are presented in the document: demonstration of causality, of responsibility and of a quantum for the claim. This process also provides additional benefits, including a high level of participant "buy-in", and the basis of a model that can be used to support the claim.
LanguageEnglish
Pages192-204
Number of pages12
JournalEuropean Journal of Operational Research
Volume148
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2003

Fingerprint

System Dynamics
Dynamical systems
Trigger
Demonstrations
Computer simulation
Causality
System dynamics
Disruption
Justify
Computer Simulation
Model
Scenarios
Term
Demonstrate
Legal process
Logic
Responsibility
Litigation

Keywords

  • project management and scheduling
  • delay and disruption
  • litigation
  • cause mapping (structuring and analysis)

Cite this

@article{96b3cb1aa1534ba09fa895ea4f3dd762,
title = "Structuring a delay and disruption claim: an application of cause-mapping and system dynamics",
abstract = "The idea of {"}Delay and Disruption{"} within projects is well-known and is often the subject of litigation claims. However, the term is ill-defined, and it is difficult to justify such claims within a legal process. This paper demonstrates a well-developed approach, which is a logical, transparent, auditable and sustainable means of presenting such a claim. It describes the format for a claim document that presents first the disruptive triggers, then using a formal qualitative model builds the case from the interacting effects of these triggers. Transformation of this model into a computer simulation and the ability to explore different scenarios provides the quantitative part of the claim document. Thus three elements are presented in the document: demonstration of causality, of responsibility and of a quantum for the claim. This process also provides additional benefits, including a high level of participant {"}buy-in{"}, and the basis of a model that can be used to support the claim.",
keywords = "project management and scheduling, delay and disruption, litigation, cause mapping (structuring and analysis)",
author = "T. Williams and F. Ackermann and C. Eden",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00372-7",
language = "English",
volume = "148",
pages = "192--204",
journal = "European Journal of Operational Research",
issn = "0377-2217",
number = "1",

}

Structuring a delay and disruption claim : an application of cause-mapping and system dynamics. / Williams, T.; Ackermann, F.; Eden, C.

In: European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 148, No. 1, 07.2003, p. 192-204.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structuring a delay and disruption claim

T2 - European Journal of Operational Research

AU - Williams, T.

AU - Ackermann, F.

AU - Eden, C.

PY - 2003/7

Y1 - 2003/7

N2 - The idea of "Delay and Disruption" within projects is well-known and is often the subject of litigation claims. However, the term is ill-defined, and it is difficult to justify such claims within a legal process. This paper demonstrates a well-developed approach, which is a logical, transparent, auditable and sustainable means of presenting such a claim. It describes the format for a claim document that presents first the disruptive triggers, then using a formal qualitative model builds the case from the interacting effects of these triggers. Transformation of this model into a computer simulation and the ability to explore different scenarios provides the quantitative part of the claim document. Thus three elements are presented in the document: demonstration of causality, of responsibility and of a quantum for the claim. This process also provides additional benefits, including a high level of participant "buy-in", and the basis of a model that can be used to support the claim.

AB - The idea of "Delay and Disruption" within projects is well-known and is often the subject of litigation claims. However, the term is ill-defined, and it is difficult to justify such claims within a legal process. This paper demonstrates a well-developed approach, which is a logical, transparent, auditable and sustainable means of presenting such a claim. It describes the format for a claim document that presents first the disruptive triggers, then using a formal qualitative model builds the case from the interacting effects of these triggers. Transformation of this model into a computer simulation and the ability to explore different scenarios provides the quantitative part of the claim document. Thus three elements are presented in the document: demonstration of causality, of responsibility and of a quantum for the claim. This process also provides additional benefits, including a high level of participant "buy-in", and the basis of a model that can be used to support the claim.

KW - project management and scheduling

KW - delay and disruption

KW - litigation

KW - cause mapping (structuring and analysis)

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00372-7

U2 - 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00372-7

DO - 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00372-7

M3 - Article

VL - 148

SP - 192

EP - 204

JO - European Journal of Operational Research

JF - European Journal of Operational Research

SN - 0377-2217

IS - 1

ER -