Structural model creation: the impact of data type and creative space on geological reasoning and interpretation

C. E. Bond, G. Johnson, J. F. Ellis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Interpretation of sparse or incomplete datasets is a fundamental part of geology, particularly when building models of the subsurface. Available geological data are often remotely sensed (seismic data) or very limited in spatial extent (borehole data). Understanding how different datasets are interpreted and what makes an interpreter effective is critical if accurate geological models are to be created. A comparison of the interpretation outcome and techniques used by two cohorts interpreting different geological datasets of the same model, an inversion structure, was made. The first cohort consists of interpreters of the synthetic seismic image data in Bond et al. (‘What do you think this is?: “Conceptual uncertainty” in geoscience interpretation’, GSA Today, 2007, 17, 4–10, http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/GSAT01711A.1); the second cohort is new and interpreted borehole data. The outcomes of the borehole interpretation dataset support earlier findings that technique use, specifically evidence of geological evolution thought processes, results in more effective interpretation. The results also show that the borehole interpreters were more effective at arriving at the correct interpretation. Analysis of their final interpretations in the context of psychological and medical image analysis research suggests that the clarity of the original dataset, the amount of noise and white space may play a role in interpretation outcome, through enforced geological reasoning during data interpretation.
LanguageEnglish
Pages83-97
Number of pages15
JournalGeological Society Special Publications
Volume421
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Feb 2015

Fingerprint

Boreholes
borehole
Geology
Image analysis
data interpretation
image analysis
seismic data
geology

Keywords

  • structural model
  • geological reasoning
  • data type
  • creative space
  • geological data

Cite this

@article{f3eede81333c4acd8aebce0df0d03d95,
title = "Structural model creation: the impact of data type and creative space on geological reasoning and interpretation",
abstract = "Interpretation of sparse or incomplete datasets is a fundamental part of geology, particularly when building models of the subsurface. Available geological data are often remotely sensed (seismic data) or very limited in spatial extent (borehole data). Understanding how different datasets are interpreted and what makes an interpreter effective is critical if accurate geological models are to be created. A comparison of the interpretation outcome and techniques used by two cohorts interpreting different geological datasets of the same model, an inversion structure, was made. The first cohort consists of interpreters of the synthetic seismic image data in Bond et al. (‘What do you think this is?: “Conceptual uncertainty” in geoscience interpretation’, GSA Today, 2007, 17, 4–10, http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/GSAT01711A.1); the second cohort is new and interpreted borehole data. The outcomes of the borehole interpretation dataset support earlier findings that technique use, specifically evidence of geological evolution thought processes, results in more effective interpretation. The results also show that the borehole interpreters were more effective at arriving at the correct interpretation. Analysis of their final interpretations in the context of psychological and medical image analysis research suggests that the clarity of the original dataset, the amount of noise and white space may play a role in interpretation outcome, through enforced geological reasoning during data interpretation.",
keywords = "structural model, geological reasoning, data type, creative space, geological data",
author = "Bond, {C. E.} and G. Johnson and Ellis, {J. F.}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1144/SP421.4",
language = "English",
volume = "421",
pages = "83--97",
journal = "Geological Society Special Publications",
issn = "0305-8719",

}

Structural model creation : the impact of data type and creative space on geological reasoning and interpretation. / Bond, C. E.; Johnson, G.; Ellis, J. F.

In: Geological Society Special Publications, Vol. 421, 11.02.2015, p. 83-97.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structural model creation

T2 - Geological Society Special Publications

AU - Bond, C. E.

AU - Johnson, G.

AU - Ellis, J. F.

PY - 2015/2/11

Y1 - 2015/2/11

N2 - Interpretation of sparse or incomplete datasets is a fundamental part of geology, particularly when building models of the subsurface. Available geological data are often remotely sensed (seismic data) or very limited in spatial extent (borehole data). Understanding how different datasets are interpreted and what makes an interpreter effective is critical if accurate geological models are to be created. A comparison of the interpretation outcome and techniques used by two cohorts interpreting different geological datasets of the same model, an inversion structure, was made. The first cohort consists of interpreters of the synthetic seismic image data in Bond et al. (‘What do you think this is?: “Conceptual uncertainty” in geoscience interpretation’, GSA Today, 2007, 17, 4–10, http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/GSAT01711A.1); the second cohort is new and interpreted borehole data. The outcomes of the borehole interpretation dataset support earlier findings that technique use, specifically evidence of geological evolution thought processes, results in more effective interpretation. The results also show that the borehole interpreters were more effective at arriving at the correct interpretation. Analysis of their final interpretations in the context of psychological and medical image analysis research suggests that the clarity of the original dataset, the amount of noise and white space may play a role in interpretation outcome, through enforced geological reasoning during data interpretation.

AB - Interpretation of sparse or incomplete datasets is a fundamental part of geology, particularly when building models of the subsurface. Available geological data are often remotely sensed (seismic data) or very limited in spatial extent (borehole data). Understanding how different datasets are interpreted and what makes an interpreter effective is critical if accurate geological models are to be created. A comparison of the interpretation outcome and techniques used by two cohorts interpreting different geological datasets of the same model, an inversion structure, was made. The first cohort consists of interpreters of the synthetic seismic image data in Bond et al. (‘What do you think this is?: “Conceptual uncertainty” in geoscience interpretation’, GSA Today, 2007, 17, 4–10, http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/GSAT01711A.1); the second cohort is new and interpreted borehole data. The outcomes of the borehole interpretation dataset support earlier findings that technique use, specifically evidence of geological evolution thought processes, results in more effective interpretation. The results also show that the borehole interpreters were more effective at arriving at the correct interpretation. Analysis of their final interpretations in the context of psychological and medical image analysis research suggests that the clarity of the original dataset, the amount of noise and white space may play a role in interpretation outcome, through enforced geological reasoning during data interpretation.

KW - structural model

KW - geological reasoning

KW - data type

KW - creative space

KW - geological data

U2 - 10.1144/SP421.4

DO - 10.1144/SP421.4

M3 - Article

VL - 421

SP - 83

EP - 97

JO - Geological Society Special Publications

JF - Geological Society Special Publications

SN - 0305-8719

ER -