Structural adjustment in the Latin American and African mobile sectors

P.J. Curwen, J.L. Whalley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In recent times, there has been much discussion about structural changes taking place on the mobile front in Europe and the USA but rather little on developments elsewhere. However, it is in Latin America and Africa where the structure of the mobile sector has recently been undergoing the most rapid and unprecedented change. This paper sets out to explain what has happened in each case covering the period to end-2005, to explain the underlying rationale and to seek finally to answer the question whether there is a common pattern in both cases or whether they are essentially independent. Many more countries are involved in the African case and hence, unsurprisingly, many more operators have been involved as both buyers and sellers. However, in both cases there was an established status quo by the early part of the decade. In Latin America, there were four fairly dominant players-América Móvil, BellSouth, Telecom Italia and Telefónica-while in Africa there were five-MTN, Orascom, Vivendi Universal, Vodacom and Vodafone. What was common to both continents was a colonial heritage. One other common feature was the presence of investors that were based outside the continent yet heavily committed to developing markets. There have been clear differences in the protagonists in the two restructurings. In the case of Latin America the process has not involved new entrants. By way of contrast, although certain domestic African operators are 'on the march', by far the most significant feature is the appearance of non-African operators and in particular those from the Middle East such as Etisalat and MTC. These two are behaving very aggressively and see their entry into Africa as a key plank in their quest for (a form of) world domination. Indigenous operators such as MTN and Vodacom are evidently not prepared to fight their corner to the same extent. Whether the very high cost of recent licences and stakes will come back to haunt their purchasers is a moot point, but what is evident is that these kinds of prices are deterring long-standing African investors.
LanguageEnglish
Pages349-363
Number of pages15
JournalTelecommunications Policy
Volume32
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2008

Fingerprint

Latin America
investor
Costs
structural change
domination
license
Middle East
restructuring
market
costs
time

Keywords

  • mobile telecommunications
  • Latin America
  • Africa
  • structural change

Cite this

Curwen, P.J. ; Whalley, J.L. / Structural adjustment in the Latin American and African mobile sectors. In: Telecommunications Policy. 2008 ; Vol. 32, No. 5. pp. 349-363.
@article{973c619e2114468ea4bbb1057054d5db,
title = "Structural adjustment in the Latin American and African mobile sectors",
abstract = "In recent times, there has been much discussion about structural changes taking place on the mobile front in Europe and the USA but rather little on developments elsewhere. However, it is in Latin America and Africa where the structure of the mobile sector has recently been undergoing the most rapid and unprecedented change. This paper sets out to explain what has happened in each case covering the period to end-2005, to explain the underlying rationale and to seek finally to answer the question whether there is a common pattern in both cases or whether they are essentially independent. Many more countries are involved in the African case and hence, unsurprisingly, many more operators have been involved as both buyers and sellers. However, in both cases there was an established status quo by the early part of the decade. In Latin America, there were four fairly dominant players-Am{\'e}rica M{\'o}vil, BellSouth, Telecom Italia and Telef{\'o}nica-while in Africa there were five-MTN, Orascom, Vivendi Universal, Vodacom and Vodafone. What was common to both continents was a colonial heritage. One other common feature was the presence of investors that were based outside the continent yet heavily committed to developing markets. There have been clear differences in the protagonists in the two restructurings. In the case of Latin America the process has not involved new entrants. By way of contrast, although certain domestic African operators are 'on the march', by far the most significant feature is the appearance of non-African operators and in particular those from the Middle East such as Etisalat and MTC. These two are behaving very aggressively and see their entry into Africa as a key plank in their quest for (a form of) world domination. Indigenous operators such as MTN and Vodacom are evidently not prepared to fight their corner to the same extent. Whether the very high cost of recent licences and stakes will come back to haunt their purchasers is a moot point, but what is evident is that these kinds of prices are deterring long-standing African investors.",
keywords = "mobile telecommunications, Latin America, Africa, structural change",
author = "P.J. Curwen and J.L. Whalley",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.telpol.2008.02.004",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "349--363",
journal = "Telecommunications Policy",
issn = "0308-5961",
number = "5",

}

Structural adjustment in the Latin American and African mobile sectors. / Curwen, P.J.; Whalley, J.L.

In: Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 32, No. 5, 06.2008, p. 349-363.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structural adjustment in the Latin American and African mobile sectors

AU - Curwen, P.J.

AU - Whalley, J.L.

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - In recent times, there has been much discussion about structural changes taking place on the mobile front in Europe and the USA but rather little on developments elsewhere. However, it is in Latin America and Africa where the structure of the mobile sector has recently been undergoing the most rapid and unprecedented change. This paper sets out to explain what has happened in each case covering the period to end-2005, to explain the underlying rationale and to seek finally to answer the question whether there is a common pattern in both cases or whether they are essentially independent. Many more countries are involved in the African case and hence, unsurprisingly, many more operators have been involved as both buyers and sellers. However, in both cases there was an established status quo by the early part of the decade. In Latin America, there were four fairly dominant players-América Móvil, BellSouth, Telecom Italia and Telefónica-while in Africa there were five-MTN, Orascom, Vivendi Universal, Vodacom and Vodafone. What was common to both continents was a colonial heritage. One other common feature was the presence of investors that were based outside the continent yet heavily committed to developing markets. There have been clear differences in the protagonists in the two restructurings. In the case of Latin America the process has not involved new entrants. By way of contrast, although certain domestic African operators are 'on the march', by far the most significant feature is the appearance of non-African operators and in particular those from the Middle East such as Etisalat and MTC. These two are behaving very aggressively and see their entry into Africa as a key plank in their quest for (a form of) world domination. Indigenous operators such as MTN and Vodacom are evidently not prepared to fight their corner to the same extent. Whether the very high cost of recent licences and stakes will come back to haunt their purchasers is a moot point, but what is evident is that these kinds of prices are deterring long-standing African investors.

AB - In recent times, there has been much discussion about structural changes taking place on the mobile front in Europe and the USA but rather little on developments elsewhere. However, it is in Latin America and Africa where the structure of the mobile sector has recently been undergoing the most rapid and unprecedented change. This paper sets out to explain what has happened in each case covering the period to end-2005, to explain the underlying rationale and to seek finally to answer the question whether there is a common pattern in both cases or whether they are essentially independent. Many more countries are involved in the African case and hence, unsurprisingly, many more operators have been involved as both buyers and sellers. However, in both cases there was an established status quo by the early part of the decade. In Latin America, there were four fairly dominant players-América Móvil, BellSouth, Telecom Italia and Telefónica-while in Africa there were five-MTN, Orascom, Vivendi Universal, Vodacom and Vodafone. What was common to both continents was a colonial heritage. One other common feature was the presence of investors that were based outside the continent yet heavily committed to developing markets. There have been clear differences in the protagonists in the two restructurings. In the case of Latin America the process has not involved new entrants. By way of contrast, although certain domestic African operators are 'on the march', by far the most significant feature is the appearance of non-African operators and in particular those from the Middle East such as Etisalat and MTC. These two are behaving very aggressively and see their entry into Africa as a key plank in their quest for (a form of) world domination. Indigenous operators such as MTN and Vodacom are evidently not prepared to fight their corner to the same extent. Whether the very high cost of recent licences and stakes will come back to haunt their purchasers is a moot point, but what is evident is that these kinds of prices are deterring long-standing African investors.

KW - mobile telecommunications

KW - Latin America

KW - Africa

KW - structural change

U2 - 10.1016/j.telpol.2008.02.004

DO - 10.1016/j.telpol.2008.02.004

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 349

EP - 363

JO - Telecommunications Policy

T2 - Telecommunications Policy

JF - Telecommunications Policy

SN - 0308-5961

IS - 5

ER -