Stories to tell? reflexive (dis)engagements and (de)legitimized selves

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article aims to tell a story about the politics of storytelling and the complexity of care. But it is not (completely) a "good" story: It is frayed in its unraveling, and its characters are on edge, in their varied states of disbelief, and misbelief. And an authorial ambivalence exists about its depth, reach and significance, about whether the pronounced pain does justice to a particular methodological approach and to a specific set of sociological-and personal-concerns. The positions of storyteller, sociologist, and granddaughter are navigated in relating an account of my grandmother's (mis)positioning as Alzheimer's "patient," as "senile," and "unknowing." My grandmother is unable to tell her story, on the academic page and in medicalized (read "authoritative," "reasoned," "capable") knowledge constructions. So, inspired by Stewart's question, "How do I remember you?" this article aims to give attention to how "memories," and opportunities for reflexive engagement and voice, are structured, even negated, within institutional frameworks. Claims to ownership risk the perpetuation of (louder) voices, again raising issues of whose "stories" count? Navigating this, the author aims to inspire the telling of more stories in order to drive theoretical and methodological investigation into the meaning of exchanges: institutional, intimate, reported, and narrated.
LanguageEnglish
Pages633-641
Number of pages9
JournalQualitative Inquiry
Volume16
Issue number8
Early online date2 Jul 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2010

Fingerprint

ambivalence
sociologist
pain
justice
politics

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's
  • care
  • memories
  • reflexivity
  • stories

Cite this

@article{00a7ceb146334d4b902b689e01aef910,
title = "Stories to tell? reflexive (dis)engagements and (de)legitimized selves",
abstract = "This article aims to tell a story about the politics of storytelling and the complexity of care. But it is not (completely) a {"}good{"} story: It is frayed in its unraveling, and its characters are on edge, in their varied states of disbelief, and misbelief. And an authorial ambivalence exists about its depth, reach and significance, about whether the pronounced pain does justice to a particular methodological approach and to a specific set of sociological-and personal-concerns. The positions of storyteller, sociologist, and granddaughter are navigated in relating an account of my grandmother's (mis)positioning as Alzheimer's {"}patient,{"} as {"}senile,{"} and {"}unknowing.{"} My grandmother is unable to tell her story, on the academic page and in medicalized (read {"}authoritative,{"} {"}reasoned,{"} {"}capable{"}) knowledge constructions. So, inspired by Stewart's question, {"}How do I remember you?{"} this article aims to give attention to how {"}memories,{"} and opportunities for reflexive engagement and voice, are structured, even negated, within institutional frameworks. Claims to ownership risk the perpetuation of (louder) voices, again raising issues of whose {"}stories{"} count? Navigating this, the author aims to inspire the telling of more stories in order to drive theoretical and methodological investigation into the meaning of exchanges: institutional, intimate, reported, and narrated.",
keywords = "Alzheimer's, care, memories, reflexivity, stories",
author = "Yvette Taylor",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1077800410374179",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "633--641",
journal = "Qualitative Inquiry",
issn = "1077-8004",
number = "8",

}

Stories to tell? reflexive (dis)engagements and (de)legitimized selves. / Taylor, Yvette.

In: Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 16, No. 8, 01.10.2010, p. 633-641.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stories to tell? reflexive (dis)engagements and (de)legitimized selves

AU - Taylor, Yvette

PY - 2010/10/1

Y1 - 2010/10/1

N2 - This article aims to tell a story about the politics of storytelling and the complexity of care. But it is not (completely) a "good" story: It is frayed in its unraveling, and its characters are on edge, in their varied states of disbelief, and misbelief. And an authorial ambivalence exists about its depth, reach and significance, about whether the pronounced pain does justice to a particular methodological approach and to a specific set of sociological-and personal-concerns. The positions of storyteller, sociologist, and granddaughter are navigated in relating an account of my grandmother's (mis)positioning as Alzheimer's "patient," as "senile," and "unknowing." My grandmother is unable to tell her story, on the academic page and in medicalized (read "authoritative," "reasoned," "capable") knowledge constructions. So, inspired by Stewart's question, "How do I remember you?" this article aims to give attention to how "memories," and opportunities for reflexive engagement and voice, are structured, even negated, within institutional frameworks. Claims to ownership risk the perpetuation of (louder) voices, again raising issues of whose "stories" count? Navigating this, the author aims to inspire the telling of more stories in order to drive theoretical and methodological investigation into the meaning of exchanges: institutional, intimate, reported, and narrated.

AB - This article aims to tell a story about the politics of storytelling and the complexity of care. But it is not (completely) a "good" story: It is frayed in its unraveling, and its characters are on edge, in their varied states of disbelief, and misbelief. And an authorial ambivalence exists about its depth, reach and significance, about whether the pronounced pain does justice to a particular methodological approach and to a specific set of sociological-and personal-concerns. The positions of storyteller, sociologist, and granddaughter are navigated in relating an account of my grandmother's (mis)positioning as Alzheimer's "patient," as "senile," and "unknowing." My grandmother is unable to tell her story, on the academic page and in medicalized (read "authoritative," "reasoned," "capable") knowledge constructions. So, inspired by Stewart's question, "How do I remember you?" this article aims to give attention to how "memories," and opportunities for reflexive engagement and voice, are structured, even negated, within institutional frameworks. Claims to ownership risk the perpetuation of (louder) voices, again raising issues of whose "stories" count? Navigating this, the author aims to inspire the telling of more stories in order to drive theoretical and methodological investigation into the meaning of exchanges: institutional, intimate, reported, and narrated.

KW - Alzheimer's

KW - care

KW - memories

KW - reflexivity

KW - stories

UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77956505977&origin=inward&txGid=0

U2 - 10.1177/1077800410374179

DO - 10.1177/1077800410374179

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 633

EP - 641

JO - Qualitative Inquiry

T2 - Qualitative Inquiry

JF - Qualitative Inquiry

SN - 1077-8004

IS - 8

ER -